{"title":"The Illusory Promise of Free Enterprise: A Primer for Promoting Racially Diverse Entrepreneurship","authors":"Mirit Eyal-Cohen","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3732998","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The U.S. Census reports that minority business ownership exceeds the corresponding racial makeup of U.S. demographics. Based on these figures, the principle of free enterprise seems to be acting on equal grounds. Could entrepreneurship be the social panacea for abolishing racial biases and the inequality gap? \n \nThis Essay argues that this parity of minority entrepreneurship is misleading. The Kaufman Foundation and Small Business Administration most recently reported that Black-owned firms represent only 7% of all U.S. businesses, Asian-owned firms represent only 4.3%, and Hispanic-owned firms represent only 10.6%. These businesses typically do not grow or expand, leaving the number of people employed by them relatively constant. Overall, minority-owned firms experience more business failure, turnover, and job loss than traditional businesses. This disparity in American free enterprise is, in and of itself, a source of systemic racism and social injustice. \n \nSeemingly, American minority entrepreneurs are given a false hope of economic independence. In fact, This Essay illustrates that current legal programs destine many of them for insolvency, bad credit, debt accumulation, or, at best, being rendered small and meaningless in the marketplace without the proper tools and opportunities to increase equity and wealth. \n \nThe Essay concludes by proposing new legal methods to increase dedicated access to capital, networking, guidance, and education for racially diverse entrepreneurs. Specifically, it proposes relaxing bureaucracy, fixing biases in lending, forming racially inclusive networks, and cultivating the role of lawyers as social agents who can inform minorities about impediments and opportunities to accumulate wealth and economic growth. Such methods may, in turn, reduce systemic inequities caused by racism.","PeriodicalId":180020,"journal":{"name":"IRPN: Other Innovation & Law & Policy (Topic)","volume":"146 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IRPN: Other Innovation & Law & Policy (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3732998","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
The U.S. Census reports that minority business ownership exceeds the corresponding racial makeup of U.S. demographics. Based on these figures, the principle of free enterprise seems to be acting on equal grounds. Could entrepreneurship be the social panacea for abolishing racial biases and the inequality gap?
This Essay argues that this parity of minority entrepreneurship is misleading. The Kaufman Foundation and Small Business Administration most recently reported that Black-owned firms represent only 7% of all U.S. businesses, Asian-owned firms represent only 4.3%, and Hispanic-owned firms represent only 10.6%. These businesses typically do not grow or expand, leaving the number of people employed by them relatively constant. Overall, minority-owned firms experience more business failure, turnover, and job loss than traditional businesses. This disparity in American free enterprise is, in and of itself, a source of systemic racism and social injustice.
Seemingly, American minority entrepreneurs are given a false hope of economic independence. In fact, This Essay illustrates that current legal programs destine many of them for insolvency, bad credit, debt accumulation, or, at best, being rendered small and meaningless in the marketplace without the proper tools and opportunities to increase equity and wealth.
The Essay concludes by proposing new legal methods to increase dedicated access to capital, networking, guidance, and education for racially diverse entrepreneurs. Specifically, it proposes relaxing bureaucracy, fixing biases in lending, forming racially inclusive networks, and cultivating the role of lawyers as social agents who can inform minorities about impediments and opportunities to accumulate wealth and economic growth. Such methods may, in turn, reduce systemic inequities caused by racism.
美国人口普查报告显示,少数族裔企业的所有权超过了美国人口中相应的种族构成。根据这些数字,自由企业原则似乎在平等的基础上发挥作用。创业能成为消除种族偏见和不平等差距的社会灵丹妙药吗?本文认为,这种对少数族裔企业家的平等对待具有误导性。考夫曼基金会(Kaufman Foundation)和小企业管理局(Small Business Administration)最近的报告显示,黑人拥有的企业仅占美国所有企业的7%,亚裔拥有的企业仅占4.3%,西班牙裔拥有的企业仅占10.6%。这些企业通常不会增长或扩张,使其雇用的人数相对稳定。总体而言,与传统企业相比,少数族裔拥有的企业经历了更多的业务失败、人员流动和失业。美国自由企业的这种差异,本身就是系统性种族主义和社会不公的根源。看起来,美国少数族裔企业家被给予了经济独立的虚假希望。事实上,本文表明,当前的法律计划注定了其中许多人破产,信用不良,债务积累,或者,在没有适当的工具和机会增加股权和财富的情况下,在市场上变得渺小和毫无意义。文章最后提出了新的法律方法,以增加不同种族的企业家获得资金、网络、指导和教育的专门途径。具体来说,它建议放松官僚主义,修正贷款中的偏见,形成包容种族的网络,并培养律师作为社会代理人的角色,让他们了解积累财富和经济增长的障碍和机会。这些方法可能反过来减少种族主义造成的系统性不平等。