The Effect of Outlet Manifold Location of Liquid-Cooled Battery Thermal Management Systems on Pumping Power

Kuuku-Dadzie Botchway, M. Shaeri
{"title":"The Effect of Outlet Manifold Location of Liquid-Cooled Battery Thermal Management Systems on Pumping Power","authors":"Kuuku-Dadzie Botchway, M. Shaeri","doi":"10.11159/htff22.143","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Hydrothermal performances of two water-cooled thermal management systems (TMSs) for cooling lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) are compared through three-dimensional simulations of laminar flow and heat transfer in TMSs, as well as conduction heat transfer with volumetric heat generation inside the battery cell. Maximum cell temperature and temperature variation across the cell are used to evaluate thermal performances of TMSs. The TMSs are different from each other by location of outlet manifold. In the bottom outlet (BO) design, the outlet is located at the bottom of the TMS’s case, while in the middle outlet (MO) design, the outlet manifold is located at the middle of the TMS’s case. Both designs provide safe operational temperature for LIBs, although the thermal performance of BO design is slightly higher than that of the MO design. This is due to distribution of water over a larger surface area in the BO TMS compared with the MO TMS. To provide a better insight on practical applications of TMSs, their thermal performances are described based on pumping power. Due to a shorter path from the inlet to the outlet in the MO design, compared with the BO design, the pressure drop is lower in the MO TMS. As a result, at a given flow rate, the MO TMS operates with a lower pumping power compared with the BO TMS. The present study suggests that selecting an appropriate TMS highly depends on design priorities. If the main goal is to maintain the cell temperature as low as possible, the BO design is an effective TMS. If the design goal is to minimize the pumping power, the MO TMS is an effective cooling system.","PeriodicalId":385356,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 8th World Congress on Mechanical, Chemical, and Material Engineering","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 8th World Congress on Mechanical, Chemical, and Material Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11159/htff22.143","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Hydrothermal performances of two water-cooled thermal management systems (TMSs) for cooling lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) are compared through three-dimensional simulations of laminar flow and heat transfer in TMSs, as well as conduction heat transfer with volumetric heat generation inside the battery cell. Maximum cell temperature and temperature variation across the cell are used to evaluate thermal performances of TMSs. The TMSs are different from each other by location of outlet manifold. In the bottom outlet (BO) design, the outlet is located at the bottom of the TMS’s case, while in the middle outlet (MO) design, the outlet manifold is located at the middle of the TMS’s case. Both designs provide safe operational temperature for LIBs, although the thermal performance of BO design is slightly higher than that of the MO design. This is due to distribution of water over a larger surface area in the BO TMS compared with the MO TMS. To provide a better insight on practical applications of TMSs, their thermal performances are described based on pumping power. Due to a shorter path from the inlet to the outlet in the MO design, compared with the BO design, the pressure drop is lower in the MO TMS. As a result, at a given flow rate, the MO TMS operates with a lower pumping power compared with the BO TMS. The present study suggests that selecting an appropriate TMS highly depends on design priorities. If the main goal is to maintain the cell temperature as low as possible, the BO design is an effective TMS. If the design goal is to minimize the pumping power, the MO TMS is an effective cooling system.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
液冷电池热管理系统出口歧管位置对泵送功率的影响
通过对两种用于锂离子电池(LIBs)冷却的水冷式热管理系统(tms)的层流和传热的三维模拟,以及电池内部体积产热的传导传热进行了比较。最大电池温度和整个电池的温度变化被用来评价tms的热性能。各tms因出口歧管的位置不同而不同。在底部出口(BO)设计中,出口位于TMS壳体的底部,而在中间出口(MO)设计中,出口歧管位于TMS壳体的中间。两种设计都为lib提供了安全的工作温度,尽管BO设计的热性能略高于MO设计。这是由于与MO TMS相比,BO TMS中的水分布在更大的表面积上。为了更好地了解tms的实际应用,本文基于泵浦功率对其热性能进行了描述。由于MO设计从进口到出口的路径较BO设计短,因此MO TMS中的压降较低。因此,在给定的流量下,与BO TMS相比,MO TMS的泵送功率更低。本研究表明,选择合适的经颅磁刺激在很大程度上取决于设计优先级。如果主要目标是保持电池温度尽可能低,BO设计是一个有效的TMS。如果设计目标是最小化泵送功率,则MO TMS是一种有效的冷却系统。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
3D Printing Of Lunar Soil Simulant towards Compact Structures Additive Manufacturing of Capillary-Driven Two-Phase Cold Plates Eulerian Approach to CFD Analysis of a Bubble Column Reactor – A Review Optimization of CWP-Slag Blended Geopolymer Concrete using Taguchi Method A Coupled PIV PTV Technique for the Dispersed Oil-Water Two-Phase Flows Within a Centrifugal Pump Impeller
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1