Enunciative Meaning-Making in Vizijos by Vytautas Mačernis

Paulius Jevsejevas
{"title":"Enunciative Meaning-Making in Vizijos by Vytautas Mačernis","authors":"Paulius Jevsejevas","doi":"10.15388/litera.2022.64.1.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article is a textual analysis of Vizijos (Visions), a cycle of poems by Vytautas Mačernis (1921–1944). The analysis focuses on enunciative meaning-making. The theory of enunciation (énonciation) originated in lingustics, as an inquiry into the speaking subject which, by an act of enunciation, appropriates the system of language. The introductory part of the article presents enunciative textual analysis as a modification of so-called standard greimasian textual semiotics. As a case in point, a textual analysis, by Algirdas Julien Greimas, of a poem by Marcelijus Martinaitis (“Ašara, dar tau anksti...”) is discussed, highlighting Greimas’ reluctance to discuss enunciative meaning-making. Next follows a brief discussion of an outline for inquiry into the formal apparatus of enunciation as proposed by Émile Benveniste. A model of dimensions of enunciative meaning-making that are relevant to a textual analysis of a lyric text is presented.The first part of the textual analysis is dedicated to the “Įžanga” (“Prelude”) of Visions. It is inferred that in terms of enunciative meaning-making the “Prelude” is distinct from the other parts of the work. It is argued that the “Prelude” does not live up to the standard set by those other parts. In order to demonstrate what that standard is, “Pirmoji” (“The First”) vision and excerpts of other parts are discussed. Throughout the demonstration, it is suggested that an inquiry into enunciative meaning-making leads to a different understanding of Visions than the one proposed in comprehensive studies by Virginija Balsevičiūtė-Šlekienė.","PeriodicalId":432201,"journal":{"name":"Literatūra","volume":"83 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Literatūra","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15388/litera.2022.64.1.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article is a textual analysis of Vizijos (Visions), a cycle of poems by Vytautas Mačernis (1921–1944). The analysis focuses on enunciative meaning-making. The theory of enunciation (énonciation) originated in lingustics, as an inquiry into the speaking subject which, by an act of enunciation, appropriates the system of language. The introductory part of the article presents enunciative textual analysis as a modification of so-called standard greimasian textual semiotics. As a case in point, a textual analysis, by Algirdas Julien Greimas, of a poem by Marcelijus Martinaitis (“Ašara, dar tau anksti...”) is discussed, highlighting Greimas’ reluctance to discuss enunciative meaning-making. Next follows a brief discussion of an outline for inquiry into the formal apparatus of enunciation as proposed by Émile Benveniste. A model of dimensions of enunciative meaning-making that are relevant to a textual analysis of a lyric text is presented.The first part of the textual analysis is dedicated to the “Įžanga” (“Prelude”) of Visions. It is inferred that in terms of enunciative meaning-making the “Prelude” is distinct from the other parts of the work. It is argued that the “Prelude” does not live up to the standard set by those other parts. In order to demonstrate what that standard is, “Pirmoji” (“The First”) vision and excerpts of other parts are discussed. Throughout the demonstration, it is suggested that an inquiry into enunciative meaning-making leads to a different understanding of Visions than the one proposed in comprehensive studies by Virginija Balsevičiūtė-Šlekienė.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Vytautas ma ernis在Vizijos中的发音意义生成
本文对维陶塔斯·马埃尔尼斯(1921-1944)的诗集《幻象》进行了文本分析。分析的重点是发音意义的形成。发音理论起源于语言学,是对说话主体通过发音行为占有语言系统的研究。文章的引言部分介绍了作为所谓标准格莱马西亚语篇符号学的修正的表述语篇分析。作为一个恰当的例子,本文讨论了Algirdas Julien Greimas对Marcelijus Martinaitis的一首诗(“Ašara, dar tau anksti…”)的文本分析,突出了Greimas不愿意讨论阐明意义的形成。接下来是对Émile Benveniste提出的发音的正式机构的研究大纲的简要讨论。提出了一种与抒情文本文本分析相关的表达意义构建维度模型。文本分析的第一部分专门用于“Įžanga”(“前奏”)的愿景。由此可以推断,《序曲》在表达意义上不同于作品的其他部分。有人认为,“序曲”没有达到其他部分设定的标准。为了证明这个标准是什么,我们讨论了“Pirmoji”(“The First”)的愿景和其他部分的摘录。在整个演示过程中,有人认为,对阐明意义的探究导致了对异象的不同理解,而不是弗吉尼亚Balsevičiūtė-Šlekienė在综合研究中提出的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Uždaros visuomenės fenomenologija Antano Vienuolio „Paskenduolėje“: antropologiniai profiliai Lietuvių literatūros kanono horizontai ir peripetijos Trumpoji draminė forma Kosto Ostrausko ir Juozo Erlicko kūryboje Žemininkai Vilniuje: santykis su daugiataučio miesto erdve „Peržengti kaustančias ribas...“: keli Vandos Zaborskaitės biografijos papildymai
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1