Ex ante analysis of circular built environment policy coherence

Felipe Bucci Ancapi
{"title":"Ex ante analysis of circular built environment policy coherence","authors":"Felipe Bucci Ancapi","doi":"10.5334/bc.337","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As European governments adopt new circular built environment policies to cope with the socio-ecological crisis, the need for evaluating such policies gains in urgency. Ex post evaluation is, however, difficult as these policies have not been in place long enough to have had significant effects. Nonetheless, ex ante policy evaluation may be possible by assessing policy coherence or the alignment and synergies of policy goals, instruments and implementation practices. This paper proposes a framework to analyse circular built environment policies. This framework is based on a combination of two existing analytical frameworks: circular city development and policy coherence analysis. The framework is tested for the case of a circular built environment in campus development at Delft University of Technology in the Netherlands, which is regarded as an urban development proxy. Policy documents and semi-structured interviews were analysed and coded. Results confirm previous findings about a prevailing focus on looping actions and indicates limited policy instrumentalisation across governance levels. Identified multilevel (in)coherence in circular city policy is pointed out as consequence of siloed-led and supply chain-based thinking and underdeveloped circular policy frameworks. Finally, the analytical benefits of circular city development and policy coherence frameworks are discussed.\nPolicy relevance\nCircular economy policies are conceptually limited in delivering a more circular city and built environment. By proposing and testing a circular city policy coherence framework, this article reveals the limited effect of circular economy policies in coping with unsustainable urbanisation. Policymaking and implementation for circularity in the built environment require frameworks that embrace urban complexities instead of reductionist approaches seeing the built environment as a mere agglomeration of supply-chains. Policymakers may use the proposed circular city policy coherence framework as a tool for ex ante policy evaluation in diverse areas of urban development, and specifically for built environment interventions. The combination of both content- and process-based frameworks enables the identification of possible (in)coherence in current and future policy goals, instruments and implementation practices. This can improve policy in early stages of implementation and create more effective policy outputs and outcomes in the long term.","PeriodicalId":363849,"journal":{"name":"Buildings & Cities","volume":"66 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Buildings & Cities","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5334/bc.337","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As European governments adopt new circular built environment policies to cope with the socio-ecological crisis, the need for evaluating such policies gains in urgency. Ex post evaluation is, however, difficult as these policies have not been in place long enough to have had significant effects. Nonetheless, ex ante policy evaluation may be possible by assessing policy coherence or the alignment and synergies of policy goals, instruments and implementation practices. This paper proposes a framework to analyse circular built environment policies. This framework is based on a combination of two existing analytical frameworks: circular city development and policy coherence analysis. The framework is tested for the case of a circular built environment in campus development at Delft University of Technology in the Netherlands, which is regarded as an urban development proxy. Policy documents and semi-structured interviews were analysed and coded. Results confirm previous findings about a prevailing focus on looping actions and indicates limited policy instrumentalisation across governance levels. Identified multilevel (in)coherence in circular city policy is pointed out as consequence of siloed-led and supply chain-based thinking and underdeveloped circular policy frameworks. Finally, the analytical benefits of circular city development and policy coherence frameworks are discussed. Policy relevance Circular economy policies are conceptually limited in delivering a more circular city and built environment. By proposing and testing a circular city policy coherence framework, this article reveals the limited effect of circular economy policies in coping with unsustainable urbanisation. Policymaking and implementation for circularity in the built environment require frameworks that embrace urban complexities instead of reductionist approaches seeing the built environment as a mere agglomeration of supply-chains. Policymakers may use the proposed circular city policy coherence framework as a tool for ex ante policy evaluation in diverse areas of urban development, and specifically for built environment interventions. The combination of both content- and process-based frameworks enables the identification of possible (in)coherence in current and future policy goals, instruments and implementation practices. This can improve policy in early stages of implementation and create more effective policy outputs and outcomes in the long term.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
循环建筑环境政策一致性事前分析
随着欧洲各国政府采取新的循环建筑环境政策来应对社会生态危机,对这些政策进行评估的需求日益迫切。但是,很难进行事后评价,因为这些政策实施的时间还不够长,没有产生重大影响。尽管如此,通过评估政策一致性或政策目标、工具和执行实践的一致性和协同作用,可以对政策进行事前评估。本文提出了一个分析循环建筑环境政策的框架。该框架基于两个现有分析框架的结合:循环城市发展和政策一致性分析。该框架在荷兰代尔夫特理工大学校园开发的圆形建筑环境中进行了测试,该校园开发被视为城市发展的代理。对政策文件和半结构化访谈进行分析和编码。结果证实了先前关于普遍关注循环行动的发现,并表明跨治理级别的政策工具化有限。指出了循环城市政策中已确定的多层次一致性,这是筒仓式主导和基于供应链的思维以及不发达的循环政策框架的结果。最后,讨论了循环城市发展和政策一致性框架的分析效益。政策相关性循环经济政策在提供更循环的城市和建筑环境方面在概念上是有限的。通过提出和测试一个循环城市政策一致性框架,本文揭示了循环经济政策在应对不可持续城市化方面的有限效果。建筑环境中循环的政策制定和实施需要包含城市复杂性的框架,而不是将建筑环境仅仅视为供应链聚集的简化方法。政策制定者可以使用所提出的循环城市政策一致性框架作为工具,在城市发展的不同领域进行事前政策评估,特别是在建筑环境干预方面。将基于内容和基于过程的框架结合起来,可以确定当前和未来政策目标、工具和实施实践之间可能的一致性。这可以在实施的早期阶段改善政策,并在长期内创造更有效的政策产出和成果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Implementing housing policies for a sufficient lifestyle Life-cycle GHG emissions of standard houses in Thailand IAQ and environmental health literacy: lived experiences of vulnerable people Evaluating mitigation strategies for building stocks against absolute climate targets Ventilation regulations and occupant practices: undetectable pollution and invisible extraction
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1