Prediction of the Testing Effort for the Safety Certification of Open-Source Software: A Case Study on a Real-Time Operating System

Domenico Cotroneo, Domenico Di Leo, R. Natella, R. Pietrantuono
{"title":"Prediction of the Testing Effort for the Safety Certification of Open-Source Software: A Case Study on a Real-Time Operating System","authors":"Domenico Cotroneo, Domenico Di Leo, R. Natella, R. Pietrantuono","doi":"10.1109/EDCC.2016.22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The reuse of Open Source Software (OSS) for safety-critical systems is seen with interest by industries, such as automotive, medical, and aerospace, as it enables shorter time-to-market and lower development costs. However, safety certification demands to supply evidence about OSS quality, and a gap analysis is needed to assess if the cost to produce certification evidence is worthwhile. This paper presents an empirical study on an open-source RTOS (RTEMS). The study investigates the relationship between software complexity and the effort to achieve a high test coverage, which is one of the most impacting activity for certification. The objective is to figure out if, and to what extent, it is possible to predict such effort preventively, by looking at software complexity metrics. This would enable a preliminary screening and benchmarking of OSS items, supporting strategic decision making. The study shows that combining metrics with classifiers can achieve a good prediction accuracy.","PeriodicalId":166039,"journal":{"name":"2016 12th European Dependable Computing Conference (EDCC)","volume":"89 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 12th European Dependable Computing Conference (EDCC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/EDCC.2016.22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

The reuse of Open Source Software (OSS) for safety-critical systems is seen with interest by industries, such as automotive, medical, and aerospace, as it enables shorter time-to-market and lower development costs. However, safety certification demands to supply evidence about OSS quality, and a gap analysis is needed to assess if the cost to produce certification evidence is worthwhile. This paper presents an empirical study on an open-source RTOS (RTEMS). The study investigates the relationship between software complexity and the effort to achieve a high test coverage, which is one of the most impacting activity for certification. The objective is to figure out if, and to what extent, it is possible to predict such effort preventively, by looking at software complexity metrics. This would enable a preliminary screening and benchmarking of OSS items, supporting strategic decision making. The study shows that combining metrics with classifiers can achieve a good prediction accuracy.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
开源软件安全认证测试工作量预测——以实时操作系统为例
对安全关键系统的开源软件(OSS)的重用引起了汽车、医疗和航空航天等行业的兴趣,因为它可以缩短上市时间并降低开发成本。然而,安全认证要求提供有关OSS质量的证据,并且需要进行差距分析,以评估产生认证证据的成本是否值得。本文对一个开源RTOS (RTEMS)进行了实证研究。该研究调查了软件复杂性和实现高测试覆盖率的努力之间的关系,这是对认证影响最大的活动之一。目标是通过查看软件复杂性度量来确定是否,以及在何种程度上,可以预防性地预测这种工作。这将使OSS项目的初步筛选和基准化成为可能,从而支持战略决策的制定。研究表明,将指标与分类器相结合可以达到较好的预测精度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Assuring Dependable Cloud-Based System Engineering: A Cloud Accountability Method Diversity, Safety and Security in Embedded Systems: Modelling Adversary Effort and Supply Chain Risks 3D-DPS: An Efficient 3D-CAC for Reliable Data Transfer in 3D ICs Dwarf: Shortening Downtime of Reboot-Based Kernel Updates Practical Emulation of Software Defects in Source Code
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1