Helical Pile Capacity-to-Torque Correlation: A More Reliable Capacity-to-Torque Factor Based on Full Scale Load Tests

M.G. Souissi
{"title":"Helical Pile Capacity-to-Torque Correlation: A More Reliable Capacity-to-Torque Factor Based on Full Scale Load Tests","authors":"M.G. Souissi","doi":"10.37308/DFIJNL.20190716.208","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The capacity-to-torque ratio, Kt, has been used in the design of helical piles and anchors for over half a century. Numerous research efforts have been conducted to accurately predict this capacity-to-torque ratio. However, almost of all these Kt factors are based on shaft geometry alone. The capacity-to-torque ratio described herein was found to depend on the shaft diameter, shaft geometry, helix configuration, axial load direction, and installation torque. In this study, 799 full scale static load tests in compression and tension were conducted on helical piles of varying shaft diameters, shaft geometry, and helix configurations in different soil types (sand, clay, and weathered bedrock). The collected data were used to study the effect of these variables on the capacity-to-torque ratio and resulted in developing a more reliable capacity-to-torque ratio, Km, that considers the effect of the variables mentioned above. The study shows that the published Kt values in AC358 (ICC-ES Acceptance Criteria for Helical Piles Systems and Devices) underestimate the pile capacity at low torque and overestimate it at high torque. In addition, and based on probability analysis, the predicted capacity using the modified Km results in a higher degree of accuracy than the one based on the published Kt values in AC358.","PeriodicalId":339795,"journal":{"name":"DFI Journal: The Journal of the Deep Foundations Institute","volume":"70 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"DFI Journal: The Journal of the Deep Foundations Institute","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37308/DFIJNL.20190716.208","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The capacity-to-torque ratio, Kt, has been used in the design of helical piles and anchors for over half a century. Numerous research efforts have been conducted to accurately predict this capacity-to-torque ratio. However, almost of all these Kt factors are based on shaft geometry alone. The capacity-to-torque ratio described herein was found to depend on the shaft diameter, shaft geometry, helix configuration, axial load direction, and installation torque. In this study, 799 full scale static load tests in compression and tension were conducted on helical piles of varying shaft diameters, shaft geometry, and helix configurations in different soil types (sand, clay, and weathered bedrock). The collected data were used to study the effect of these variables on the capacity-to-torque ratio and resulted in developing a more reliable capacity-to-torque ratio, Km, that considers the effect of the variables mentioned above. The study shows that the published Kt values in AC358 (ICC-ES Acceptance Criteria for Helical Piles Systems and Devices) underestimate the pile capacity at low torque and overestimate it at high torque. In addition, and based on probability analysis, the predicted capacity using the modified Km results in a higher degree of accuracy than the one based on the published Kt values in AC358.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
螺旋桩承载力-扭矩相关性:基于全尺寸荷载试验的更可靠的承载力-扭矩系数
能力-扭矩比Kt在螺旋桩和锚的设计中已经使用了半个多世纪。为了准确预测这一容量-扭矩比,已经进行了大量的研究工作。然而,几乎所有这些Kt因子都仅基于轴的几何形状。本文所述的容量-扭矩比取决于轴直径、轴几何形状、螺旋结构、轴向载荷方向和安装扭矩。在本研究中,在不同土壤类型(砂、粘土和风化基岩)中,对不同轴径、轴几何形状和螺旋构型的螺旋桩进行了799个全尺寸压缩和拉伸静载荷试验。将收集到的数据用于研究这些变量对产能转矩比的影响,并得出考虑上述变量影响的更可靠的产能转矩比Km。研究表明,AC358 (ICC-ES螺旋桩系统和设备验收标准)中公布的Kt值低估了低扭矩时的桩容量,高估了高扭矩时的桩容量。此外,基于概率分析,使用修正Km预测的容量比基于AC358公布的Kt值的预测精度更高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Results of an Instrumented Static Loading Test and Its Application to Design Compilation of an International Survey Resistance Factors at Serviceability Limit State Using the Texas Cone Penetrometer as the Predictive Model Geotechnical Resistances of Drilled Shafts in Triassic Basin Sedimentary Rocks Skin Friction Directionality in Monotonically- and Cyclically-Loaded Bio-inspired Piles in Sand Full-Scale Load Testing and Extraction of Augered Cast-in-Place (ACIP) Piles in Central Florida
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1