Learning style of medical students and their preferred teaching methodologies in a medical college in Nepal: a descriptive cross-sectional study

Prajwol Pathak, Sulav Neupane, Sujan Tamang, Sunischit Neupane, Vinayak Dhungana, Shirish Khatri, Rochak Gautam, Gaurab Mainali
{"title":"Learning style of medical students and their preferred teaching methodologies in a medical college in Nepal: a descriptive cross-sectional study","authors":"Prajwol Pathak, Sulav Neupane, Sujan Tamang, Sunischit Neupane, Vinayak Dhungana, Shirish Khatri, Rochak Gautam, Gaurab Mainali","doi":"10.1097/GH9.0000000000000299","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Each individual learns differently. Honey and Mumford classified learning styles as activists, reflectors, theorists, and pragmatists. This study was conducted to find out the frequency of learning styles and preferred teaching methodology of students in a medical college in Nepal. Methods: Two hundred MBBS students participated in this study who were selected through a stratified sampling technique using students’ class year as a stratum, followed by a simple random sampling method. Honey and Mumford’s learning style questionnaire was used to determine learning styles. A self-developed questionnaire was used to find their preferred teaching methodology. Results: Of the total, 139 males and 61 females participated in the study where 9 (4.5%) students were activists, 21 (10.5%) were theorists, 112 (56%) were reflectors, and 24 (12%) were pragmatists. Out of all participants, 50 (25%) preferred interactive learning, 47 (23.5%) preferred problem-based learning, 59 (29.5%) preferred self-study, and only 2 (1%) students preferred one-way lectures and guest speakers each. Conclusion: The majority of students were reflectors (56%) and pragmatists (12%). Most students preferred self-study (29.5%) but one-way lectures were less preferred. Medical institutions should align teaching strategies with the learning styles of medical students to improve their understanding and performance.","PeriodicalId":306111,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Surgery: Global Health","volume":"95 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Surgery: Global Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/GH9.0000000000000299","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Each individual learns differently. Honey and Mumford classified learning styles as activists, reflectors, theorists, and pragmatists. This study was conducted to find out the frequency of learning styles and preferred teaching methodology of students in a medical college in Nepal. Methods: Two hundred MBBS students participated in this study who were selected through a stratified sampling technique using students’ class year as a stratum, followed by a simple random sampling method. Honey and Mumford’s learning style questionnaire was used to determine learning styles. A self-developed questionnaire was used to find their preferred teaching methodology. Results: Of the total, 139 males and 61 females participated in the study where 9 (4.5%) students were activists, 21 (10.5%) were theorists, 112 (56%) were reflectors, and 24 (12%) were pragmatists. Out of all participants, 50 (25%) preferred interactive learning, 47 (23.5%) preferred problem-based learning, 59 (29.5%) preferred self-study, and only 2 (1%) students preferred one-way lectures and guest speakers each. Conclusion: The majority of students were reflectors (56%) and pragmatists (12%). Most students preferred self-study (29.5%) but one-way lectures were less preferred. Medical institutions should align teaching strategies with the learning styles of medical students to improve their understanding and performance.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
尼泊尔一所医学院医学生的学习风格及其首选教学方法:一项描述性横断面研究
每个人学习的方式都不一样。霍尼和芒福德将学习风格分为积极主义、反思主义、理论主义和实用主义。本研究旨在了解尼泊尔某医学院学生的学习方式频率及偏好的教学方法。方法:采用分层抽样的方法,以学生年级为分层,再采用简单随机抽样的方法,选取200名MBBS学生参与本研究。使用Honey和Mumford的学习风格问卷来确定学习风格。一份自行开发的调查问卷被用来寻找他们喜欢的教学方法。结果:男学生139人,女学生61人,其中积极分子9人(4.5%),理论家21人(10.5%),反思者112人(56%),实用主义者24人(12%)。在所有参与者中,50人(25%)喜欢互动学习,47人(23.5%)喜欢基于问题的学习,59人(29.5%)喜欢自学,只有2人(1%)喜欢单向讲座和嘉宾演讲。结论:大多数学生是反射者(56%)和实用主义者(12%)。大多数学生喜欢自学(29.5%),但不太喜欢单向授课。医疗机构应将教学策略与医学生的学习风格相结合,以提高他们的理解和表现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Undiagnosed Behçet’s disease presenting as Fournier’s gangrene in undiagnosed Behçet’s disease: a case report of a young adult male A comparative study of ultrasonography (USG) and computed tomography for detecting ureteric calculi in patients with acute flank pain, and analysis of factors influencing ultrasound detection rates Statins in breast cancer treatment and management: a mini-review of potential benefits and clinical implications Sicca syndrome post-COVID-19 infection: a case report Outbreak of an emerging zoonoses Nipah virus: an update
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1