Stakeholder Management in Public Procurement: Rethinking the Engagement Strategy for Co-Financing in Rivers State, Nigeria

S. Warmate
{"title":"Stakeholder Management in Public Procurement: Rethinking the Engagement Strategy for Co-Financing in Rivers State, Nigeria","authors":"S. Warmate","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3758216","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In Nigeria, there are many cases of failed public procurements resulting in undue delay or abandonment of projects, especially those wholly funded by the government, even in projects under co-financing arrangements with the Multilateral Development Institutions (MDIs). This anomaly is prevalent whenever an opposition party takes over the government because the political elites who originally support the projects lose interest or power. These failed projects represent a monumental loss to the public.<br><br>The MDIs, recognizing these political elites as stakeholders and understanding the intricacies of governance within the Nigerian context, apply their stakeholder engagement guidelines to engage this category of stakeholders to ensure that the government fulfils its obligations and responsibilities assigned in projects under co-financing arrangements. Sadly, the implementation of these guidelines is not monitored and evaluated on an ongoing basis within the procurement life cycle of these projects. Ideally, the guidelines for stakeholder engagement and management should be implemented from conceptualization to delivery of the project. Additionally, these guidelines do not anticipate the complex dynamics associated with changes of government, when existing priorities and policies are altered because of shifting interests. Often these interests affect the commitment of the government to carry out its obligation under these projects, particularly in cases where the government is required to provide counterpart funding, pay compensation, and provide other resources – and so the changes frustrate project implementation. Oddly, it may appear as though the MDIs, regardless of the time spent operating in Nigeria, do not anticipate political interference and policy inconsistencies whenever there is a change of government, for the MDIs have not adapted their stakeholder engagement strategies sufficiently to meet the ever-present political risk.<br><br>To meet these challenges, rethinking the stakeholder engagement strategy has become critical so that development projects will be delivered in a timely manner for the people’s benefit. The political risks that lead to abandoned projects mean that MDIs should increase the level of monitoring and evaluation and move away from co-financing agreements with the Nigerian states unless such co-financing arrangements allow for counterpart funds to be sourced directly from the Federal Government, which is also a principal party in financing agreement between states and the MDIs and which could mitigate project political risks at the state level.","PeriodicalId":360236,"journal":{"name":"Political Economy: Government Expenditures & Related Policies eJournal","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Political Economy: Government Expenditures & Related Policies eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3758216","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In Nigeria, there are many cases of failed public procurements resulting in undue delay or abandonment of projects, especially those wholly funded by the government, even in projects under co-financing arrangements with the Multilateral Development Institutions (MDIs). This anomaly is prevalent whenever an opposition party takes over the government because the political elites who originally support the projects lose interest or power. These failed projects represent a monumental loss to the public.

The MDIs, recognizing these political elites as stakeholders and understanding the intricacies of governance within the Nigerian context, apply their stakeholder engagement guidelines to engage this category of stakeholders to ensure that the government fulfils its obligations and responsibilities assigned in projects under co-financing arrangements. Sadly, the implementation of these guidelines is not monitored and evaluated on an ongoing basis within the procurement life cycle of these projects. Ideally, the guidelines for stakeholder engagement and management should be implemented from conceptualization to delivery of the project. Additionally, these guidelines do not anticipate the complex dynamics associated with changes of government, when existing priorities and policies are altered because of shifting interests. Often these interests affect the commitment of the government to carry out its obligation under these projects, particularly in cases where the government is required to provide counterpart funding, pay compensation, and provide other resources – and so the changes frustrate project implementation. Oddly, it may appear as though the MDIs, regardless of the time spent operating in Nigeria, do not anticipate political interference and policy inconsistencies whenever there is a change of government, for the MDIs have not adapted their stakeholder engagement strategies sufficiently to meet the ever-present political risk.

To meet these challenges, rethinking the stakeholder engagement strategy has become critical so that development projects will be delivered in a timely manner for the people’s benefit. The political risks that lead to abandoned projects mean that MDIs should increase the level of monitoring and evaluation and move away from co-financing agreements with the Nigerian states unless such co-financing arrangements allow for counterpart funds to be sourced directly from the Federal Government, which is also a principal party in financing agreement between states and the MDIs and which could mitigate project political risks at the state level.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
公共采购中的利益相关者管理:重新思考尼日利亚河流州共同融资的参与战略
在尼日利亚,有许多公共采购失败的案例,导致项目的不当拖延或放弃,特别是那些完全由政府资助的项目,即使是在与多边发展机构(MDIs)共同融资安排下的项目。每当反对党执政时,这种反常现象就会普遍存在,因为原本支持这些项目的政治精英们失去了兴趣或权力。这些失败的项目对公众来说是巨大的损失。MDIs认识到这些政治精英是利益相关者,并了解尼日利亚背景下治理的复杂性,应用其利益相关者参与指南来吸引这类利益相关者,以确保政府履行在共同融资安排下的项目中分配的义务和责任。遗憾的是,在这些项目的采购生命周期内,没有对这些准则的执行情况进行持续的监测和评价。理想情况下,涉众参与和管理的指导方针应该从项目的概念化到交付实现。此外,当现有的优先事项和政策因利益转移而改变时,这些指导方针没有预料到与政府变化相关的复杂动态。这些利益往往会影响政府在这些项目下履行其义务的承诺,特别是在政府被要求提供配套资金、支付赔偿和提供其他资源的情况下,因此这些变化会阻碍项目的实施。奇怪的是,似乎MDIs,不管在尼日利亚运作了多长时间,都没有预料到政府更迭时的政治干预和政策不一致,因为MDIs没有充分调整其利益相关者参与策略,以满足始终存在的政治风险。为了应对这些挑战,重新思考利益相关者参与战略变得至关重要,这样发展项目才能及时交付,造福人民。导致放弃项目的政治风险意味着多边发展机构应提高监测和评估水平,并避免与尼日利亚各州达成联合融资协议,除非这种联合融资安排允许直接从联邦政府获得对应资金,因为联邦政府也是各州与多边发展机构之间融资协议的主要当事方,这可以减轻州一级的项目政治风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Impact of One Parent Family Payment Reforms on the Labour Market Outcomes of Lone Parents The Effect of Retirement Age on Labor Productivity: A Macroeconomic Approach Auditul extern al fondurilor destinate siguranţei şi apărării naţionale (External Audit of Funds for National Security and Defense) Revisiting Retirement and Social Security Claiming Decisions Medicaid Expansion and Medical Liability Costs
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1