Pancreatic cancer, Radiomics and Artificial Intelligence: A Review.

L. Martí-Bonmatí, L. Cerdà-Alberich, Alexandre Pérez-Enguix, R. Díaz Beveridge, E. M. Montalvá Orón, J. Pérez Rojas, Á. Alberich-Bayarri
{"title":"Pancreatic cancer, Radiomics and Artificial Intelligence: A Review.","authors":"L. Martí-Bonmatí, L. Cerdà-Alberich, Alexandre Pérez-Enguix, R. Díaz Beveridge, E. M. Montalvá Orón, J. Pérez Rojas, Á. Alberich-Bayarri","doi":"10.1259/bjr.20220072","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) are generally classified into four categories based on contrast-enhanced CT at diagnosis: resectable, borderline resectable, unresectable, and metastatic disease. In the initial grading and staging of PDAC, structured radiological templates are useful but limited, as there is a need to define the aggressiveness and microscopic disease stage of these tumours to ensure adequate treatment allocation. Quantitative imaging analysis allows radiomics and dynamic imaging features to provide information of clinical outcomes, and to construct clinical models based on radiomics signatures or imaging phenotypes. These quantitative features may be used as prognostic and predictive biomarkers in clinical decision making, enabling personalized management of advanced PDAC. Deep Learning and Convolutional Neural Networks also provide high level bioinformatics tools that can help define features associated with a given aspect of PDAC biology and aggressiveness, paving the way to define outcomes based on these features. Thus, the prediction of tumour phenotype, treatment response and patient prognosis may be feasible by using such comprehensive and integrated radiomics models. Despite these promising results, quantitative imaging is not ready for clinical implementation in PDAC. Limitations include the instability of metrics and lack of external validation. Large properly annotated datasets, including relevant semantic features (demographics, blood markers, genomics), image harmonization, robust radiomics analysis, clinically significant tasks as outputs, comparisons with gold standards (such as TNM or pretreatment classifications) and fully independent validation cohorts, will be required for the development of trustworthy radiomics and Artificial Intelligence solutions to predict PDAC aggressiveness in a clinical setting.","PeriodicalId":226783,"journal":{"name":"The British journal of radiology","volume":"163 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The British journal of radiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20220072","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) are generally classified into four categories based on contrast-enhanced CT at diagnosis: resectable, borderline resectable, unresectable, and metastatic disease. In the initial grading and staging of PDAC, structured radiological templates are useful but limited, as there is a need to define the aggressiveness and microscopic disease stage of these tumours to ensure adequate treatment allocation. Quantitative imaging analysis allows radiomics and dynamic imaging features to provide information of clinical outcomes, and to construct clinical models based on radiomics signatures or imaging phenotypes. These quantitative features may be used as prognostic and predictive biomarkers in clinical decision making, enabling personalized management of advanced PDAC. Deep Learning and Convolutional Neural Networks also provide high level bioinformatics tools that can help define features associated with a given aspect of PDAC biology and aggressiveness, paving the way to define outcomes based on these features. Thus, the prediction of tumour phenotype, treatment response and patient prognosis may be feasible by using such comprehensive and integrated radiomics models. Despite these promising results, quantitative imaging is not ready for clinical implementation in PDAC. Limitations include the instability of metrics and lack of external validation. Large properly annotated datasets, including relevant semantic features (demographics, blood markers, genomics), image harmonization, robust radiomics analysis, clinically significant tasks as outputs, comparisons with gold standards (such as TNM or pretreatment classifications) and fully independent validation cohorts, will be required for the development of trustworthy radiomics and Artificial Intelligence solutions to predict PDAC aggressiveness in a clinical setting.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
胰腺癌,放射组学和人工智能:综述。
胰腺导管腺癌(PDAC)患者在诊断时通常根据增强CT分为四类:可切除、交界性可切除、不可切除和转移性疾病。在PDAC的初始分级和分期中,结构化的放射模板是有用的,但有局限性,因为需要定义这些肿瘤的侵袭性和显微镜下的疾病分期,以确保适当的治疗分配。定量成像分析允许放射组学和动态成像特征提供临床结果的信息,并基于放射组学特征或成像表型构建临床模型。这些定量特征可以作为临床决策中的预后和预测性生物标志物,使晚期PDAC的个性化管理成为可能。深度学习和卷积神经网络还提供了高级生物信息学工具,可以帮助定义与PDAC生物学和侵袭性相关的特定方面的特征,为基于这些特征定义结果铺平道路。因此,利用这种综合的放射组学模型预测肿瘤表型、治疗反应和患者预后可能是可行的。尽管这些有希望的结果,定量成像还没有准备好在PDAC的临床应用。限制包括度量的不稳定性和缺乏外部验证。大型适当注释的数据集,包括相关的语义特征(人口统计学、血液标志物、基因组学)、图像协调、稳健的放射组学分析、作为输出的临床重要任务、与金标准(如TNM或预处理分类)的比较以及完全独立的验证队列,将需要开发可靠的放射组学和人工智能解决方案,以预测临床环境中的PDAC侵袭性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Pearls and pitfalls of structured staging and reporting of rectal cancer on MRI: an international multireader study The diagnostic value of quantitative assessment of MR neurography in chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Transhepatic or transperitoneal technique for cholecystostomy: results of the multicentre retrospective audit of cholecystostomy and further interventions (MACAFI) Pancreatic cancer, Radiomics and Artificial Intelligence: A Review. Radiomics quality score in renal masses: a systematic assessment on current literature.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1