L’invalidità del Safe Harbor Agreement

F. Accardo
{"title":"L’invalidità del Safe Harbor Agreement","authors":"F. Accardo","doi":"10.30687/RG/2281-6100/2018/01/007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this article is that to explain the impact of the landmark decision Schrems c. Data Protection Commissioner [Ireland] - delivered on 7 October 2015 (Case C-362/2014 EU) by the Court of Justice - on the European scenario. Starting from a brief analysis of the major outcomes originated from the pronunciation of the Court of Justice, then it tries to study the level of criticality that the Safe Harbor Agreement and the subsequently adequacy Commission decision 2000/520/EC – that has been invalidated with Schrems judgment – have provoked before this pronunciation on the matter of safeguarding personal privacy of european citizens when their personal data are transferred outside the European Union, in particular the reference is at the US context. Moreover it focuses on the most important aspects of the new EU-US agreement called Privacy Shield: it can be really considered the safer solution for data sharing in the light of the closer implementation of the Regulation (EU) 2016/679, which will take the place of the Directive 95 /46/CE on the EU data protection law?","PeriodicalId":204526,"journal":{"name":"Ricerche giuridiche","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ricerche giuridiche","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30687/RG/2281-6100/2018/01/007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of this article is that to explain the impact of the landmark decision Schrems c. Data Protection Commissioner [Ireland] - delivered on 7 October 2015 (Case C-362/2014 EU) by the Court of Justice - on the European scenario. Starting from a brief analysis of the major outcomes originated from the pronunciation of the Court of Justice, then it tries to study the level of criticality that the Safe Harbor Agreement and the subsequently adequacy Commission decision 2000/520/EC – that has been invalidated with Schrems judgment – have provoked before this pronunciation on the matter of safeguarding personal privacy of european citizens when their personal data are transferred outside the European Union, in particular the reference is at the US context. Moreover it focuses on the most important aspects of the new EU-US agreement called Privacy Shield: it can be really considered the safer solution for data sharing in the light of the closer implementation of the Regulation (EU) 2016/679, which will take the place of the Directive 95 /46/CE on the EU data protection law?
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
安全港协议无效
本文的目的是解释法院于2015年10月7日作出的具有里程碑意义的决定Schrems c.数据保护专员[爱尔兰](案例c -362/2014 EU)对欧洲情况的影响。从对法院发音产生的主要结果的简要分析开始,然后试图研究安全港协议和随后的充分性委员会决定2000/520/EC -已被Schrems判决无效-在此发音之前在保护欧洲公民的个人隐私问题上引发的关键程度,当他们的个人数据被转移到欧盟以外时。特别是在美国的背景下。此外,它还关注了名为隐私盾的新欧盟-美国协议的最重要方面:鉴于更密切地实施法规(EU) 2016/679,它真的可以被认为是更安全的数据共享解决方案,该法规将取代欧盟数据保护法的指令95 /46/CE ?
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Il work for equity nelle start-up innovative a responsabilità limitata La modificabilità della proposta di aumento del capitale sociale nella s.p.a. Brevi note in tema di marketplace lending alla luce del nuovo regolamento europeo in materia di crowdfunding The Dawn of Crypto Assets: A Comet or a New Universe? Treats and Opportunities of the Upcoming Stars of the Financial Market Money Mules and Tumblers Money Laundering During the Cryptocurrency Era
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1