AVANT-GARDE MEXICAN REVOULTIONARY NATIONALISM: UNIVERSALIZATION OR COSMOPOLITANIZATION ? DAVID ALFARO SIQUEIROS’ “THREE CALLS…” AND MANUEL MAPLES ARCE’S ACTUAL NO. 1 (1921)

ARTis ON Pub Date : 2018-12-23 DOI:10.37935/aion.v0i7.192
D. Flores
{"title":"AVANT-GARDE MEXICAN REVOULTIONARY NATIONALISM: UNIVERSALIZATION OR COSMOPOLITANIZATION ? DAVID ALFARO SIQUEIROS’ “THREE CALLS…” AND MANUEL MAPLES ARCE’S ACTUAL NO. 1 (1921)","authors":"D. Flores","doi":"10.37935/aion.v0i7.192","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This essay compares two foundational manifestos of the Mexican 20th century avant-garde, both from 1921: David Alfaro Siqueiros’ “Three calls…” and Manuel Maples Arce’s Actual No. 1. Resulting from the ideological milieu of the Mexican Revolution, these texts contain distinct proposals to think about the place of the nation within an international context, after the successful entry of Mexico to modernity via revolution. In the muralist Siqueiros’ case, to think the Mexican nation implies a process of what he calls ‘universalization’, and which is driven primarily by a classical understanding of the ‘natural order’ and a specific relationship to the past. In the estridentista Maples Arce’s case, his call for a ‘cosmopolitanization’ derives from the notion that modernity is an implacable process, the access to which necessitates no relationship to the past and which rejects the ‘natural order’ in favor of a conception of the modern as urban.","PeriodicalId":363677,"journal":{"name":"ARTis ON","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ARTis ON","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37935/aion.v0i7.192","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This essay compares two foundational manifestos of the Mexican 20th century avant-garde, both from 1921: David Alfaro Siqueiros’ “Three calls…” and Manuel Maples Arce’s Actual No. 1. Resulting from the ideological milieu of the Mexican Revolution, these texts contain distinct proposals to think about the place of the nation within an international context, after the successful entry of Mexico to modernity via revolution. In the muralist Siqueiros’ case, to think the Mexican nation implies a process of what he calls ‘universalization’, and which is driven primarily by a classical understanding of the ‘natural order’ and a specific relationship to the past. In the estridentista Maples Arce’s case, his call for a ‘cosmopolitanization’ derives from the notion that modernity is an implacable process, the access to which necessitates no relationship to the past and which rejects the ‘natural order’ in favor of a conception of the modern as urban.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
先锋墨西哥革命民族主义:普遍化还是世界化?大卫·阿尔法罗·西奎罗斯的“三个电话……”和曼努埃尔·梅普尔斯的实际号码。1 (1921)
这篇文章比较了墨西哥20世纪先锋派的两个基本宣言,都是1921年的:大卫·阿尔法罗·西奎罗斯的“三个呼唤……”和曼努埃尔·梅普尔斯·阿尔斯的“实际第一”。由于墨西哥革命的意识形态环境,这些文本包含了在墨西哥通过革命成功进入现代性之后,在国际背景下思考国家位置的独特建议。在壁画家Siqueiros的案例中,认为墨西哥民族意味着他所谓的“普遍化”的过程,这主要是由对“自然秩序”的古典理解以及与过去的特定关系所驱动的。在estridentista Maples Arce的案例中,他对“世界化”的呼吁源于这样一种观念,即现代性是一个不可改变的过程,与过去没有任何关系,并且拒绝“自然秩序”,赞成现代作为城市的概念。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Modernidade e Tradição: Os traços arquitectónicos na Avenida Ressano Garcia no período entre 1904 a 1909 Visualizing the transcendental: Irakli Parjiani’s metaphysical landscapes Um busto de Bento XIV, o Papa do Fidelíssimo, no Museu Nacional de Machado de Castro Cadeirões da Renascença espanhola no Porto – uma história de família Retratos setecentistas em Oeiras: contributos para o estudo da genealogia iconográfica do Marquês de Pombal
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1