RUL Prediction: Reducing Statistical Model Uncertainty Via Bayesian Model Aggregation

Chao Jia, Hanwen Zhang
{"title":"RUL Prediction: Reducing Statistical Model Uncertainty Via Bayesian Model Aggregation","authors":"Chao Jia, Hanwen Zhang","doi":"10.1109/SAFEPROCESS45799.2019.9213433","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"It is important to predict the remaining useful life (RUL) for evaluating the performance of industrial equipment. Many simple and complex methods have been proposed to predict RUL based on stochastic processes. However, these methods have different prediction accuracies. The uncertainty associated with using one of these methods instead of another is called statistical model uncertainty. Therefore, some problems naturally arise: How can we reduce the uncertainty among different methods? Is it possible to obtain a more exact prediction of RUL, compared with the individual method? In this study, we apply a Bayesian model aggregation (BMA) approach to solve these problems. For a Wiener degradation process with unknown parameters, assume that there are $P$ types of methods to predict RUL, for example, maximum likelihood estimation (MLE), stochastic Newton algorithm (SNA), and Kalman filter (KF)- based methods. Then, there are 2P- 1 distinct combinations of these $P$ types of methods, each with a corresponding statistical model and an estimated parameter vector. BMA can statistically combine these estimated parameter vectors through a weighted average, and thus, the probability density function (PDF) of RUL can be obtained. BMA can be successfully applied to realistic bearing data, and simulation results show that BMA achieves higher prediction accuracy than an individual method.","PeriodicalId":353946,"journal":{"name":"2019 CAA Symposium on Fault Detection, Supervision and Safety for Technical Processes (SAFEPROCESS)","volume":"71 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 CAA Symposium on Fault Detection, Supervision and Safety for Technical Processes (SAFEPROCESS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SAFEPROCESS45799.2019.9213433","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

It is important to predict the remaining useful life (RUL) for evaluating the performance of industrial equipment. Many simple and complex methods have been proposed to predict RUL based on stochastic processes. However, these methods have different prediction accuracies. The uncertainty associated with using one of these methods instead of another is called statistical model uncertainty. Therefore, some problems naturally arise: How can we reduce the uncertainty among different methods? Is it possible to obtain a more exact prediction of RUL, compared with the individual method? In this study, we apply a Bayesian model aggregation (BMA) approach to solve these problems. For a Wiener degradation process with unknown parameters, assume that there are $P$ types of methods to predict RUL, for example, maximum likelihood estimation (MLE), stochastic Newton algorithm (SNA), and Kalman filter (KF)- based methods. Then, there are 2P- 1 distinct combinations of these $P$ types of methods, each with a corresponding statistical model and an estimated parameter vector. BMA can statistically combine these estimated parameter vectors through a weighted average, and thus, the probability density function (PDF) of RUL can be obtained. BMA can be successfully applied to realistic bearing data, and simulation results show that BMA achieves higher prediction accuracy than an individual method.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
规则预测:通过贝叶斯模型聚合降低统计模型的不确定性
剩余使用寿命(RUL)的预测是评价工业设备性能的重要手段。人们提出了许多简单和复杂的基于随机过程的RUL预测方法。然而,这些方法的预测精度各不相同。使用其中一种方法而不使用另一种方法所带来的不确定性称为统计模型不确定性。因此,一些问题自然产生了:如何减少不同方法之间的不确定性?与个体方法相比,是否有可能获得更精确的RUL预测?在本研究中,我们采用贝叶斯模型聚合(BMA)方法来解决这些问题。对于参数未知的维纳退化过程,假设有$P$类型的方法来预测RUL,例如,最大似然估计(MLE),随机牛顿算法(SNA)和基于卡尔曼滤波(KF)的方法。然后,这些$P$类型的方法有2P- 1个不同的组合,每个组合都有相应的统计模型和估计的参数向量。BMA可以将这些估计的参数向量通过加权平均进行统计组合,从而得到RUL的概率密度函数(PDF)。BMA可以成功地应用于实际轴承数据,仿真结果表明BMA比单个方法具有更高的预测精度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Research on Fault Estimation and Fault-tolerant Control of Hypersonic Aircraft Based on Adaptive Observer A Real-Time Anomaly Detection Approach Based on Sparse Distributed Representation Multimode Process Monitoring with Mode Transition Constraints Active Fault-Tolerant Tracking Control of an Unmanned Quadrotor Helicopter under Sensor Faults Cryptanalysis on a (k, n)-Threshold Multiplicative Secret Sharing Scheme
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1