Archaeology and Heritage of Slavery in Eastern Africa

L. Marshall
{"title":"Archaeology and Heritage of Slavery in Eastern Africa","authors":"L. Marshall","doi":"10.1093/acrefore/9780190277734.013.398","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Despite its long history in the region, slavery in Eastern Africa has attracted little archaeological attention. This deficit is partly due to the reticence of many Eastern Africans to discuss slavery, a historically painful topic. In addition, some archaeologists have expressed skepticism about the material visibility of the practice. That is, they question whether slavery can be archaeologically identified. Given these concerns, those archaeologists who have pursued the study of slavery in Eastern Africa tend to focus on the 18th and 19th centuries, when historical documentation of the practice is well established. Archaeologists in the region have considered slavery in a variety of settings—including not only plantations but also contexts of slaving and emancipation. Research in Eastern Africa has helped to challenge and complicate definitions of slavery rooted in American historical experience. Yet, perspectives on slavery from outside of the region continue to shape public memory in Eastern Africa; increased outside interest and investment in the heritage of slavery has begun to influence both memorialization and the practice of memory itself. For example, heritage funding from UNESCO is tied to particular expectations for how slavery is defined and what counts as heritage. In this context, archaeologists studying slavery in Eastern Africa grapple with their responsibilities to many different stakeholders and audiences. In particular, they continue to work to make slavery research and memorialization more meaningful to Eastern Africans themselves. In addition, researchers have begun to develop methodological tools to push the study of slavery in Eastern Africa to deeper time periods less undergirded by historical documents.","PeriodicalId":166397,"journal":{"name":"Oxford Research Encyclopedia of African History","volume":"80 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oxford Research Encyclopedia of African History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190277734.013.398","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Despite its long history in the region, slavery in Eastern Africa has attracted little archaeological attention. This deficit is partly due to the reticence of many Eastern Africans to discuss slavery, a historically painful topic. In addition, some archaeologists have expressed skepticism about the material visibility of the practice. That is, they question whether slavery can be archaeologically identified. Given these concerns, those archaeologists who have pursued the study of slavery in Eastern Africa tend to focus on the 18th and 19th centuries, when historical documentation of the practice is well established. Archaeologists in the region have considered slavery in a variety of settings—including not only plantations but also contexts of slaving and emancipation. Research in Eastern Africa has helped to challenge and complicate definitions of slavery rooted in American historical experience. Yet, perspectives on slavery from outside of the region continue to shape public memory in Eastern Africa; increased outside interest and investment in the heritage of slavery has begun to influence both memorialization and the practice of memory itself. For example, heritage funding from UNESCO is tied to particular expectations for how slavery is defined and what counts as heritage. In this context, archaeologists studying slavery in Eastern Africa grapple with their responsibilities to many different stakeholders and audiences. In particular, they continue to work to make slavery research and memorialization more meaningful to Eastern Africans themselves. In addition, researchers have begun to develop methodological tools to push the study of slavery in Eastern Africa to deeper time periods less undergirded by historical documents.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
东非奴隶制的考古和遗产
尽管东非的奴隶制在该地区有着悠久的历史,但它却很少引起考古学家的注意。这种赤字部分是由于许多东非人不愿讨论奴隶制这个历史上令人痛苦的话题。此外,一些考古学家对这种做法的物质可见性表示怀疑。也就是说,他们质疑奴隶制能否在考古学上得到证实。考虑到这些问题,那些研究东非奴隶制的考古学家倾向于把重点放在18世纪和19世纪,当时这种做法的历史文献已经得到了很好的证实。该地区的考古学家考虑了多种背景下的奴隶制——不仅包括种植园,还包括奴隶制和解放的背景。对东非的研究有助于挑战和复杂化植根于美国历史经验的奴隶制定义。然而,该地区以外对奴隶制的看法继续影响着东非的公众记忆;外界对奴隶制遗产的兴趣和投资的增加,已经开始影响对奴隶制的纪念和记忆本身的实践。例如,联合国教科文组织的遗产资助与如何定义奴隶制以及什么是遗产的特定期望有关。在这种背景下,研究东非奴隶制的考古学家要努力解决他们对许多不同利益相关者和受众的责任。特别是,他们继续努力使奴隶制研究和纪念对东非人自己更有意义。此外,研究人员已经开始开发方法论工具,将对东非奴隶制的研究推向历史文献较少支持的更深时期。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Queen Njinga of Ndongo and Matamba Zanj Revolt in the Abbasid Caliphate (Iraq) Routes to Emancipation in East Africa Women in Algeria Uganda–Tanzania War
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1