Transfer of Personal Data to Third Countries and the “Equivalent Level” of Protection According to the European Court of Justice

Emanuela Furramani
{"title":"Transfer of Personal Data to Third Countries and the “Equivalent Level” of Protection According to the European Court of Justice","authors":"Emanuela Furramani","doi":"10.2478/ejfe-2023-0001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The focus of this study is the transfer of personal data to third countries or international organizations according to EU Regulation No. 679/2016 (GDPR) on the protection of personal data. The primary goal of this Regulation concerning data transfer to third countries is to ensure that the subject’s rights and freedoms are safeguarded at the same level as provided by GDPR. According to GDPR, before any transfer to a third country or international organization, it must first be ascertained whether the European Commission has established that a third country ensures an adequate level of protection. Regarding personal data protection in the third state, the Court of Justice of the European Union has intervened on different occasions. In the last decision, in 2020, the Court declared invalid the European Commission’s Decision No. 2016/1250 on the adequacy of the protection provided by the EU-US Privacy Shield (CJEU, Schrems II, 2020, July 16) because it does not provide effective and enforceable rights for personal data subjects in cases of interference. According to the Court of Justice of the European Union, the US does not guarantee an “essentially equivalent” level of protection to that provided by the European Union under Article 45(1) GDPR, read in conjunction with Articles 7, 8, and 47 of the European Union’s Charter of Fundamental Rights, which guarantee respect for private and family life, personal data protection, and the right to effective judicial protection.","PeriodicalId":202400,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Formal Sciences and Engineering","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Formal Sciences and Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/ejfe-2023-0001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract The focus of this study is the transfer of personal data to third countries or international organizations according to EU Regulation No. 679/2016 (GDPR) on the protection of personal data. The primary goal of this Regulation concerning data transfer to third countries is to ensure that the subject’s rights and freedoms are safeguarded at the same level as provided by GDPR. According to GDPR, before any transfer to a third country or international organization, it must first be ascertained whether the European Commission has established that a third country ensures an adequate level of protection. Regarding personal data protection in the third state, the Court of Justice of the European Union has intervened on different occasions. In the last decision, in 2020, the Court declared invalid the European Commission’s Decision No. 2016/1250 on the adequacy of the protection provided by the EU-US Privacy Shield (CJEU, Schrems II, 2020, July 16) because it does not provide effective and enforceable rights for personal data subjects in cases of interference. According to the Court of Justice of the European Union, the US does not guarantee an “essentially equivalent” level of protection to that provided by the European Union under Article 45(1) GDPR, read in conjunction with Articles 7, 8, and 47 of the European Union’s Charter of Fundamental Rights, which guarantee respect for private and family life, personal data protection, and the right to effective judicial protection.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
根据欧洲法院的规定,将个人数据转移到第三国和“同等水平”的保护
本研究的重点是根据欧盟第679/2016号个人数据保护条例(GDPR)将个人数据转移到第三国或国际组织。本条例关于向第三国传输数据的主要目标是确保主体的权利和自由得到与GDPR提供的相同水平的保障。根据GDPR,在任何转移到第三国或国际组织之前,必须首先确定欧盟委员会是否已经确定第三国确保了足够的保护水平。关于第三国的个人数据保护,欧盟法院在不同场合进行了干预。在2020年的最后一项裁决中,法院宣布欧盟委员会关于欧盟-美国隐私盾提供的保护充分性的第2016/1250号决定无效(CJEU, Schrems II, 2020年,7月16日),因为它没有为干预情况下的个人数据主体提供有效和可执行的权利。欧盟法院认为,美国不保证提供与欧盟根据《通用数据保护条例》第45(1)条(与《欧盟基本权利宪章》第7、8和47条一起解读)提供的“本质上等同”的保护水平,后者保障尊重私人和家庭生活、保护个人数据以及获得有效司法保护的权利。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Design of a Conceptual Model for Improving Company Performance Based on Lean Management Applying the Viable System Model (VSM) The Flypaper Effect Phenomenon: Evidence from Indonesia The New Integral Transform: “NE Transform” and Its Applications Transfer of Personal Data to Third Countries and the “Equivalent Level” of Protection According to the European Court of Justice The Structural and Optical Properties of Perovskite Thin Films
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1