Camouflaged Poisoning Attack on Graph Neural Networks

Chao Jiang, Yingzhe He, Richard Chapman, Hongyi Wu
{"title":"Camouflaged Poisoning Attack on Graph Neural Networks","authors":"Chao Jiang, Yingzhe He, Richard Chapman, Hongyi Wu","doi":"10.1145/3512527.3531373","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Graph neural networks (GNNs) have enabled the automation of many web applications that entail node classification on graphs, such as scam detection in social media and event prediction in service networks. Nevertheless, recent studies revealed that the GNNs are vulnerable to adversarial attacks, where feeding GNNs with poisoned data at training time can lead them to yield catastrophically devastative test accuracy. This finding heats up the frontier of attacks and defenses against GNNs. However, the prior studies mainly posit that the adversaries can enjoy free access to manipulate the original graph, while obtaining such access could be too costly in practice. To fill this gap, we propose a novel attacking paradigm, named Generative Adversarial Fake Node Camouflaging (GAFNC), with its crux lying in crafting a set of fake nodes in a generative-adversarial regime. These nodes carry camouflaged malicious features and can poison the victim GNN by passing their malicious messages to the original graph via learned topological structures, such that they 1) maximize the devastation of classification accuracy (i.e., global attack) or 2) enforce the victim GNN to misclassify a targeted node set into prescribed classes (i.e., target attack). We benchmark our experiments on four real-world graph datasets, and the results substantiate the viability, effectiveness, and stealthiness of our proposed poisoning attack approach. Code is released in github.com/chao92/GAFNC.","PeriodicalId":179895,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 2022 International Conference on Multimedia Retrieval","volume":"87 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 2022 International Conference on Multimedia Retrieval","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3512527.3531373","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Graph neural networks (GNNs) have enabled the automation of many web applications that entail node classification on graphs, such as scam detection in social media and event prediction in service networks. Nevertheless, recent studies revealed that the GNNs are vulnerable to adversarial attacks, where feeding GNNs with poisoned data at training time can lead them to yield catastrophically devastative test accuracy. This finding heats up the frontier of attacks and defenses against GNNs. However, the prior studies mainly posit that the adversaries can enjoy free access to manipulate the original graph, while obtaining such access could be too costly in practice. To fill this gap, we propose a novel attacking paradigm, named Generative Adversarial Fake Node Camouflaging (GAFNC), with its crux lying in crafting a set of fake nodes in a generative-adversarial regime. These nodes carry camouflaged malicious features and can poison the victim GNN by passing their malicious messages to the original graph via learned topological structures, such that they 1) maximize the devastation of classification accuracy (i.e., global attack) or 2) enforce the victim GNN to misclassify a targeted node set into prescribed classes (i.e., target attack). We benchmark our experiments on four real-world graph datasets, and the results substantiate the viability, effectiveness, and stealthiness of our proposed poisoning attack approach. Code is released in github.com/chao92/GAFNC.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
图神经网络的伪装中毒攻击
图神经网络(gnn)已经实现了许多需要在图上进行节点分类的web应用程序的自动化,例如社交媒体中的骗局检测和服务网络中的事件预测。然而,最近的研究表明,gnn容易受到对抗性攻击,在训练时向gnn提供有毒数据可能导致它们产生灾难性的破坏性测试准确性。这一发现使针对gnn的攻击和防御的前沿升温。然而,先前的研究主要假设攻击者可以自由地访问原始图,而在实践中获得这种访问可能代价过高。为了填补这一空白,我们提出了一种新的攻击范式,称为生成对抗假节点伪装(GAFNC),其关键在于在生成对抗机制中制作一组假节点。这些节点携带伪装的恶意特征,可以通过学习的拓扑结构将其恶意消息传递给原始图,从而毒害受害者GNN,这样它们1)最大限度地破坏分类准确性(即,全局攻击)或2)强制受害者GNN将目标节点集错误地分类为规定的类(即,目标攻击)。我们在四个真实世界的图形数据集上对我们的实验进行了基准测试,结果证实了我们提出的投毒攻击方法的可行性、有效性和隐蔽性。代码发布在github.com/chao92/GAFNC。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Self-Lifting: A Novel Framework for Unsupervised Voice-Face Association Learning DMPCANet: A Low Dimensional Aggregation Network for Visual Place Recognition Revisiting Performance Measures for Cross-Modal Hashing MFGAN: A Lightweight Fast Multi-task Multi-scale Feature-fusion Model based on GAN Weakly Supervised Fine-grained Recognition based on Combined Learning for Small Data and Coarse Label
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1