Diagnostic Accuracy of the Neonatal Early Onset Sepsis Calculator in Screening for Early Onset Sepsis in Neonates More Than 35 Weeks Age of Gestation

Kathleen Joyce Del Carmen, A. Du, K.J.N. Kimseng
{"title":"Diagnostic Accuracy of the Neonatal Early Onset Sepsis Calculator in Screening for Early Onset Sepsis in Neonates More Than 35 Weeks Age of Gestation","authors":"Kathleen Joyce Del Carmen, A. Du, K.J.N. Kimseng","doi":"10.56964/pidspj20222302010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Early-onset sepsis (EOS) is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality among neonates. Diagnosis of EOS can be difficult as clinical signs are subtle. The use of the Neonatal EOS Calculator (NEOSC) may help screen high-risk neonates for EOS and may result in a significant reduction in unnecessary antibiotic use. Objective: To determine the diagnostic accuracy of the NEOSC in screening for EOS in neonates more than 35 weeks age of gestation. Methodology: This was a retrospective, case-control study where 245 septic (cases) and 245 non-septic (controls) neonatal and maternal medical records were reviewed. The EOS risk classification from the NEOSC was compared with the actual clinical outcome. An online statistical software (medcalc.org) was used to compute for the sensitivity (Sn), specificity (Sp), positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR) and accuracy of the NEOSC. Results: Based on the NEOSC, only 64 of 245 clinically septic neonates were truly positive for sepsis while 181 were falsely negative for sepsis. Of the 245 non-septic neonates, 3 were falsely positive for sepsis, while 242 were truly negative for sepsis. With a 95% confidence interval, the computed variables showed a Sn 26.12%, Sp 98.78%, PPV 76.12%, NPV 89.95%, PLR 21.33, and NLR 0.75. The accuracy of the NEOSC is 89.33%. Conclusion: The NEOSC had poor sensitivity and is not recommended in screening for EOS in neonates more than 35 weeks age of gestation. It may be used as an adjunct in EOS diagnosis due to its high specificity and accuracy.","PeriodicalId":117545,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric Infectious Disease Society of the Philippines Journal","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric Infectious Disease Society of the Philippines Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56964/pidspj20222302010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Early-onset sepsis (EOS) is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality among neonates. Diagnosis of EOS can be difficult as clinical signs are subtle. The use of the Neonatal EOS Calculator (NEOSC) may help screen high-risk neonates for EOS and may result in a significant reduction in unnecessary antibiotic use. Objective: To determine the diagnostic accuracy of the NEOSC in screening for EOS in neonates more than 35 weeks age of gestation. Methodology: This was a retrospective, case-control study where 245 septic (cases) and 245 non-septic (controls) neonatal and maternal medical records were reviewed. The EOS risk classification from the NEOSC was compared with the actual clinical outcome. An online statistical software (medcalc.org) was used to compute for the sensitivity (Sn), specificity (Sp), positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR) and accuracy of the NEOSC. Results: Based on the NEOSC, only 64 of 245 clinically septic neonates were truly positive for sepsis while 181 were falsely negative for sepsis. Of the 245 non-septic neonates, 3 were falsely positive for sepsis, while 242 were truly negative for sepsis. With a 95% confidence interval, the computed variables showed a Sn 26.12%, Sp 98.78%, PPV 76.12%, NPV 89.95%, PLR 21.33, and NLR 0.75. The accuracy of the NEOSC is 89.33%. Conclusion: The NEOSC had poor sensitivity and is not recommended in screening for EOS in neonates more than 35 weeks age of gestation. It may be used as an adjunct in EOS diagnosis due to its high specificity and accuracy.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
新生儿早发脓毒症计算器在筛查妊娠35周以上新生儿早发脓毒症中的诊断准确性
背景:早发性脓毒症(EOS)是新生儿发病和死亡的主要原因。诊断EOS可能是困难的,因为临床症状是微妙的。新生儿EOS计算器(NEOSC)的使用可能有助于筛查高风险新生儿EOS,并可能导致不必要的抗生素使用显著减少。目的:探讨NEOSC在35周龄以上新生儿EOS筛查中的诊断准确性。方法:这是一个回顾性的病例对照研究,其中245例败血症(病例)和245例非败血症(对照)新生儿和产妇的医疗记录进行了审查。将NEOSC的EOS风险分类与实际临床结果进行比较。采用在线统计软件(medcalc.org)计算NEOSC的敏感性(Sn)、特异性(Sp)、阳性预测值(PPV)、阴性预测值(NPV)、阳性似然比(PLR)、阴性似然比(NLR)和准确性。结果:基于NEOSC, 245例临床脓毒症新生儿中只有64例脓毒症真阳性,181例脓毒症假阴性。245例非脓毒症新生儿中,3例脓毒症假阳性,242例脓毒症真阴性。计算变量Sn为26.12%,Sp为98.78%,PPV为76.12%,NPV为89.95%,PLR为21.33,NLR为0.75,置信区间为95%。NEOSC的准确度为89.33%。结论:NEOSC敏感性较差,不推荐用于35周龄以上新生儿的EOS筛查。由于其高特异性和准确性,可作为EOS诊断的辅助手段。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Clinical Profile and Treatment Outcomes Of Acute Cholangitis in Children in a Tertiary Government Hospital in the Philippines: A Five-Year Retrospective Study. SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR cycle threshold value and its association with disease severity and mortality among hospitalized pediatric covid-19 patients. Clinical and Microbiological Profile and Factors Affecting Outcome among Pediatric Febrile Neutropenic Patients with Hematologic Malignancies. Aye, AI Captain! The Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Immunoglobulin (IgG) Levels Using Chemiluminescence Immunoassay (CLIA) Anti-S-RBD Test in Term Neonates Born to COVID-19 Fully Vaccinated Mothers
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1