The Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Immunoglobulin (IgG) Levels Using Chemiluminescence Immunoassay (CLIA) Anti-S-RBD Test in Term Neonates Born to COVID-19 Fully Vaccinated Mothers

Ray Mendoza, Belle Ranile, Nathalie Anne Hernaez
{"title":"The Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Immunoglobulin (IgG) Levels Using Chemiluminescence Immunoassay (CLIA) Anti-S-RBD Test in Term Neonates Born to COVID-19 Fully Vaccinated Mothers","authors":"Ray Mendoza, Belle Ranile, Nathalie Anne Hernaez","doi":"10.56964/pidspj20232402002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Though protective levels of neonatal SARS-CoV2 IgG still warrant further studies, maternal antibodies from COVID-19 vaccination may be the key to neonatal protection against COVID-19 related complications. This study aimed to correlate SARS-CoV2 IgG titers of term newborns delivered to fully vaccinated/boosted mothers with the time of dose completion to delivery and the type of COVID-19 vaccine received by the mothers. Methodology: A single center prospective cohort study that utilized CLIA Anti-S-RBD IgG determination in cord blood was done. Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U Test were used to determine significant differences between IgG titers from vaccine types and groups as to trimester when COVID-19 dose was completed. Spearman’s rank was used to determine the correlation between IgG levels and interval of dose completion to delivery. Results: All 177 newborns enrolled in the study had reactive results (> 1 AU/ml) regardless of vaccine type received and trimester of maternal vaccination completion. The highest titers recorded per group was 19,340 AU/ml from the booster group and 5,960 AU/ml from the primary series group. The mRNA vaccinated group exhibited higher titers compared to other vaccine types regardless of the trimester completion for both groups. Conclusions: A significant difference between IgG levels showed that higher titers were noted in the booster group compared to the primary series group across all trimesters. There was also a significant correlation between titer levels and time of dose completion to delivery with higher titers associated with more recent dose completion for both groups.","PeriodicalId":117545,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric Infectious Disease Society of the Philippines Journal","volume":"3 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric Infectious Disease Society of the Philippines Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56964/pidspj20232402002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Though protective levels of neonatal SARS-CoV2 IgG still warrant further studies, maternal antibodies from COVID-19 vaccination may be the key to neonatal protection against COVID-19 related complications. This study aimed to correlate SARS-CoV2 IgG titers of term newborns delivered to fully vaccinated/boosted mothers with the time of dose completion to delivery and the type of COVID-19 vaccine received by the mothers. Methodology: A single center prospective cohort study that utilized CLIA Anti-S-RBD IgG determination in cord blood was done. Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U Test were used to determine significant differences between IgG titers from vaccine types and groups as to trimester when COVID-19 dose was completed. Spearman’s rank was used to determine the correlation between IgG levels and interval of dose completion to delivery. Results: All 177 newborns enrolled in the study had reactive results (> 1 AU/ml) regardless of vaccine type received and trimester of maternal vaccination completion. The highest titers recorded per group was 19,340 AU/ml from the booster group and 5,960 AU/ml from the primary series group. The mRNA vaccinated group exhibited higher titers compared to other vaccine types regardless of the trimester completion for both groups. Conclusions: A significant difference between IgG levels showed that higher titers were noted in the booster group compared to the primary series group across all trimesters. There was also a significant correlation between titer levels and time of dose completion to delivery with higher titers associated with more recent dose completion for both groups.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用化学发光免疫测定 (CLIA) 抗 S-RBD 检测法检测接种 COVID-19 疫苗的母亲所生足月新生儿的 2019 年冠状病毒病 (COVID-19) 免疫球蛋白 (IgG) 水平
背景:尽管新生儿 SARS-CoV2 IgG 的保护性水平仍有待进一步研究,但接种 COVID-19 疫苗产生的母体抗体可能是保护新生儿免受 COVID-19 相关并发症影响的关键。本研究旨在将完全接种/强化接种疫苗的母亲所分娩的足月新生儿的 SARS-CoV2 IgG 滴度与接种完成到分娩的时间以及母亲接种的 COVID-19 疫苗类型相关联。研究方法:采用 CLIA 方法测定脐带血中的抗 S-RBD IgG,进行单中心前瞻性队列研究。采用 Kruskal-Wallis 和 Mann-Whitney U 检验来确定疫苗类型和组别间 IgG 滴度在完成 COVID-19 疫苗接种后三个月内的显著差异。斯皮尔曼等级检验用于确定 IgG 水平与完成接种到分娩的时间间隔之间的相关性。结果参与研究的所有 177 名新生儿都出现了反应性结果(> 1 AU/ml),与接种的疫苗类型和母体完成疫苗接种的三个月无关。每组记录到的最高滴度分别为加强接种组的 19,340 AU/ml和初免接种组的 5,960 AU/ml。与其他疫苗类型相比,接种 mRNA 疫苗组的滴度更高,与两组完成接种的孕期无关。结论IgG水平之间的显着差异表明,在所有三个月中,加强免疫组的滴度均高于初免组。滴度水平与完成接种到分娩的时间之间也存在明显的相关性,两组中完成接种时间越近,滴度越高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Clinical Profile and Treatment Outcomes Of Acute Cholangitis in Children in a Tertiary Government Hospital in the Philippines: A Five-Year Retrospective Study. SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR cycle threshold value and its association with disease severity and mortality among hospitalized pediatric covid-19 patients. Clinical and Microbiological Profile and Factors Affecting Outcome among Pediatric Febrile Neutropenic Patients with Hematologic Malignancies. Aye, AI Captain! The Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Immunoglobulin (IgG) Levels Using Chemiluminescence Immunoassay (CLIA) Anti-S-RBD Test in Term Neonates Born to COVID-19 Fully Vaccinated Mothers
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1