Pablo Cruz, H. Astudillo, R. Hilliard, Miguel Collado
{"title":"Assessing Migration of a 20-Year-Old System to a Micro-Service Platform Using ATAM","authors":"Pablo Cruz, H. Astudillo, R. Hilliard, Miguel Collado","doi":"10.1109/ICSA-C.2019.00039","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Architecture evaluation is a systematic approach to evaluate target architectures and ATAM (Architectural Trade-off Analysis Method) is one of the available methods. Migration of software systems imply many architectural decisions that should be systematically evaluated to assess concrete trade-offs and risks. This article reports on the ATAM usage at a mid-size Chilean specialty software development company to assess the migration of its 20-year old flagship product to a micro-service platform. Over three days, 10 key architectural decisions, addressing 35 scenarios, were considered. Since almost all requirements were deemed essential for legal reasons, the evaluation scheme used a modified importance dimension distinguishing among business-key (first line deal breakers), legally-mandated (second-line deal breakers), and desirable requirements. Key lessons learned include the very positive client feedback on the introduction of systematic evaluation of architectural choices using business criteria.","PeriodicalId":239999,"journal":{"name":"2019 IEEE International Conference on Software Architecture Companion (ICSA-C)","volume":"50 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 IEEE International Conference on Software Architecture Companion (ICSA-C)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSA-C.2019.00039","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10
Abstract
Architecture evaluation is a systematic approach to evaluate target architectures and ATAM (Architectural Trade-off Analysis Method) is one of the available methods. Migration of software systems imply many architectural decisions that should be systematically evaluated to assess concrete trade-offs and risks. This article reports on the ATAM usage at a mid-size Chilean specialty software development company to assess the migration of its 20-year old flagship product to a micro-service platform. Over three days, 10 key architectural decisions, addressing 35 scenarios, were considered. Since almost all requirements were deemed essential for legal reasons, the evaluation scheme used a modified importance dimension distinguishing among business-key (first line deal breakers), legally-mandated (second-line deal breakers), and desirable requirements. Key lessons learned include the very positive client feedback on the introduction of systematic evaluation of architectural choices using business criteria.