Time to Move On

J. Weir
{"title":"Time to Move On","authors":"J. Weir","doi":"10.24908/federalism-e.v24i1.16230","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The reform of Canada’s federal electoral system was a key platform promise of the Liberal party throughout the 2015 election campaign. Justin Trudeau famously proclaimed that the 2015 federal election would be the last in Canada under a first-past-the-post (FPTP) system; but, as several years followed, there was no change, and discourse surrounding the issue has largely fizzled out (Small, 41). Canada’s FPTP system has not changed since confederation, and it remains among only four other democracies worldwide that use “this archaic electoral system” (Rebick). FPTP is considered to create two main issues in Canadian politics: distortion of votes, and heightened regionalism. Voting behaviour and outcomes are currently distorted through unequal vote weight, ‘wasted votes’, and the phenomenon of strategic voting. Regionalism leads to national division, skews which issues are considered electorally important, negatively alters party behaviour, and changes how political preferences are perceived in Canada. Together, these effects are disengaging the Canadian public from political participation. This paper will explain the ways in which vote distortion and regionalism plague Canada’s current electoral system and the health of its democracy, and demonstrate how a shift towards a mixed-member proportional representation (MMPR) electoral system can alleviate those issues. Specifically, MMPR’s provision of a broader second vote nullifies the effect of wasted votes and strategic voting, while discouraging political parties from engaging in behaviour that targets specific electoral regions and produces political polarization.","PeriodicalId":247232,"journal":{"name":"Federalism-E","volume":"36 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Federalism-E","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24908/federalism-e.v24i1.16230","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The reform of Canada’s federal electoral system was a key platform promise of the Liberal party throughout the 2015 election campaign. Justin Trudeau famously proclaimed that the 2015 federal election would be the last in Canada under a first-past-the-post (FPTP) system; but, as several years followed, there was no change, and discourse surrounding the issue has largely fizzled out (Small, 41). Canada’s FPTP system has not changed since confederation, and it remains among only four other democracies worldwide that use “this archaic electoral system” (Rebick). FPTP is considered to create two main issues in Canadian politics: distortion of votes, and heightened regionalism. Voting behaviour and outcomes are currently distorted through unequal vote weight, ‘wasted votes’, and the phenomenon of strategic voting. Regionalism leads to national division, skews which issues are considered electorally important, negatively alters party behaviour, and changes how political preferences are perceived in Canada. Together, these effects are disengaging the Canadian public from political participation. This paper will explain the ways in which vote distortion and regionalism plague Canada’s current electoral system and the health of its democracy, and demonstrate how a shift towards a mixed-member proportional representation (MMPR) electoral system can alleviate those issues. Specifically, MMPR’s provision of a broader second vote nullifies the effect of wasted votes and strategic voting, while discouraging political parties from engaging in behaviour that targets specific electoral regions and produces political polarization.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
是时候继续前进了
改革加拿大联邦选举制度是自由党在2015年竞选期间的一个关键政纲承诺。贾斯廷·特鲁多(Justin Trudeau)曾宣称,2015年的联邦选举将是加拿大最后一次实行简单多数制的选举;但是,几年之后,情况并没有改变,围绕这个问题的讨论也基本上销声匿迹了(Small, 41)。加拿大的FPTP制度自联邦以来一直没有改变,它仍然是世界上仅有的四个使用“这种古老选举制度”的民主国家之一(Rebick)。FPTP被认为在加拿大政治中造成了两个主要问题:扭曲选票和加剧的地区主义。投票行为和结果目前由于不平等的投票权重、“浪费选票”和战略投票现象而扭曲。地区主义导致国家分裂,扭曲了哪些问题被认为是选举的重要问题,消极地改变了政党行为,并改变了加拿大人对政治偏好的看法。总之,这些影响正在使加拿大公众脱离政治参与。本文将解释投票扭曲和地区主义如何困扰加拿大当前的选举制度及其民主的健康,并展示向混合成员比例代表制(MMPR)选举制度的转变如何缓解这些问题。具体来说,MMPR关于更广泛的第二次投票的规定消除了浪费选票和战略投票的影响,同时阻止政党从事针对特定选区和产生政治两极分化的行为。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Reconciliatory Federalism Local Government-First Nation Treaty Agreements in B.C. Time to Move On State Masculine Logics, Neoliberalism, and Canadian Federalism Federal Government’s Changing Role in Canada’s Health Care Funding Structure and its Impacts
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1