The Nationalization and Liberalization of the Retail Trade Industry in the Philippines

Bing Baltazar C. Brillo
{"title":"The Nationalization and Liberalization of the Retail Trade Industry in the Philippines","authors":"Bing Baltazar C. Brillo","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1925323","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Philippine policy experience in the retail trade sector is distinct. Two radical policy shifts have occurred in the industry and the policy change took a circular path. In 1954, the Third Congress passed Republic Act (R.A.) 1180, the Retail Trade Nationalization Act, and in 2000, the Eleventh Congress enacted R.A. 8762, the Retail Trade Liberalization Act. The former was a change from an open to a protectionist policy, while the latter was a change from a protectionist to an open policy. Typically, any move to change an existing policy is always contentious and difficult. Those benefiting from the status quo would naturally take action to preserve their advantage; thus, policy change entails winners and losers. In examining the politics of policy change in the retail trade, this paper will utilize four factors — the context, the stakeholders and the cost benefit equation, policy rationalization, and presidential intervention and concessions — to systematically outline and explain the policy shifts that occurred.","PeriodicalId":245549,"journal":{"name":"Business History eJournal","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Business History eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1925323","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The Philippine policy experience in the retail trade sector is distinct. Two radical policy shifts have occurred in the industry and the policy change took a circular path. In 1954, the Third Congress passed Republic Act (R.A.) 1180, the Retail Trade Nationalization Act, and in 2000, the Eleventh Congress enacted R.A. 8762, the Retail Trade Liberalization Act. The former was a change from an open to a protectionist policy, while the latter was a change from a protectionist to an open policy. Typically, any move to change an existing policy is always contentious and difficult. Those benefiting from the status quo would naturally take action to preserve their advantage; thus, policy change entails winners and losers. In examining the politics of policy change in the retail trade, this paper will utilize four factors — the context, the stakeholders and the cost benefit equation, policy rationalization, and presidential intervention and concessions — to systematically outline and explain the policy shifts that occurred.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
菲律宾零售业的国有化与自由化
菲律宾在零售贸易部门的政策经验是独特的。该行业发生了两次根本性的政策转变,政策变化走了一条循环路径。1954年,第三届国会通过了共和国法案(R.A.) 1180,即零售贸易国有化法案,2000年,第十一届国会颁布了R.A. 8762,即零售贸易自由化法案。前者是开放政策向保护主义政策的转变,后者是保护主义政策向开放政策的转变。通常情况下,任何改变现有政策的举措总是充满争议和困难。那些从现状中受益的人自然会采取行动保持自己的优势;因此,政策变化会带来赢家和输家。在研究零售业政策变化的政治时,本文将利用四个因素-背景,利益相关者和成本效益方程,政策合理化以及总统干预和让步-系统地概述和解释发生的政策转变。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Continuity and Change in Construction Procurement William Henry Cavendish-Bentinck-Scott, 4th Duke of Portland Emergence of Modern Impersonal Exchange: Role of Formalization in the Rise of Modern Capitalism Samuelson’s Neoclassical Synthesis Did Not Betray Keynes: Keynes Had Offered Just Such a Synthesis in the General Theory, As Well As to Hicks and Harrod in Correspondence, in 1936 Longitudinal Study of Seylan Bank, Sri Lanka from 1996 to 2008
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1