Effects of isometric resistance training on blood pressure and physical fitness of men

Flávio de Souza Araújo, R. M. R. Dias, R. L. Nascimento, Eduardo Seiji Numata Filho, J. F. V. D. Moraes, S. Moreira
{"title":"Effects of isometric resistance training on blood pressure and physical fitness of men","authors":"Flávio de Souza Araújo, R. M. R. Dias, R. L. Nascimento, Eduardo Seiji Numata Filho, J. F. V. D. Moraes, S. Moreira","doi":"10.1590/S1980-6574201800020012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aims: The present study aimed to investigate the effects of whole body isometric resistance training (IRT) on blood pressure (BP), strength and aerobic fitness. We also analyzed whether the effects of whole body isometric training compares to whole body dynamic resistance training (DRT). Methods: Twenty-nine pre-hypertensive sedentary males, aged between 40 and 60 years were divided into three groups: IRT (n = 10), DRT (n = 9), and Control (n = 10). Both programs involved whole body resistance training, and occurred for 12 weeks, three times/week, at an intensity of 60% of a dynamic one repetition maximum test (1RM). Before and after 12 weeks, 24 hours blood pressure monitoring, 1RM strength and aerobic fitness were assessed. Results: IRT reduced diastolic BP values during a 24-hour period and daytime. There was also a decrease in mean BP values during daytime (P < 0.05). No interaction between time and group in systolic BP, diastolic BP, mean BP, heart rate and arterial stiffness index were observed (P > 0.05). IRT increased strength and aerobic fitness when compared to Control group. However, these changes were lower than DRT regarding strength (DRT: ∆ = 43.1±10.6% vs. IRT: ∆ = 24.1±7.1% vs. CON: Δ = 4.2±11.5%; P < 0.05) and aerobic fitness (DRT: ∆ = 22.9±10.7% vs. IRT: ∆ = 12.9±6.1% vs. CON: Δ = -2.1±7.4%; P < 0.01). Conclusion: Whole body IRT reduced diastolic BP and mean BP, however, the decrease was not different for the DRT group. IRT also increased strength and aerobic fitness, nevertheless, these changes were lower than after DRT.","PeriodicalId":153884,"journal":{"name":"Motriz: Revista de Educação Física","volume":"123 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Motriz: Revista de Educação Física","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/S1980-6574201800020012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Aims: The present study aimed to investigate the effects of whole body isometric resistance training (IRT) on blood pressure (BP), strength and aerobic fitness. We also analyzed whether the effects of whole body isometric training compares to whole body dynamic resistance training (DRT). Methods: Twenty-nine pre-hypertensive sedentary males, aged between 40 and 60 years were divided into three groups: IRT (n = 10), DRT (n = 9), and Control (n = 10). Both programs involved whole body resistance training, and occurred for 12 weeks, three times/week, at an intensity of 60% of a dynamic one repetition maximum test (1RM). Before and after 12 weeks, 24 hours blood pressure monitoring, 1RM strength and aerobic fitness were assessed. Results: IRT reduced diastolic BP values during a 24-hour period and daytime. There was also a decrease in mean BP values during daytime (P < 0.05). No interaction between time and group in systolic BP, diastolic BP, mean BP, heart rate and arterial stiffness index were observed (P > 0.05). IRT increased strength and aerobic fitness when compared to Control group. However, these changes were lower than DRT regarding strength (DRT: ∆ = 43.1±10.6% vs. IRT: ∆ = 24.1±7.1% vs. CON: Δ = 4.2±11.5%; P < 0.05) and aerobic fitness (DRT: ∆ = 22.9±10.7% vs. IRT: ∆ = 12.9±6.1% vs. CON: Δ = -2.1±7.4%; P < 0.01). Conclusion: Whole body IRT reduced diastolic BP and mean BP, however, the decrease was not different for the DRT group. IRT also increased strength and aerobic fitness, nevertheless, these changes were lower than after DRT.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
等长抗阻训练对男性血压和体质的影响
目的:本研究旨在探讨全身等长阻力训练(IRT)对血压(BP)、力量和有氧健身的影响。我们还分析了全身等长训练与全身动态阻力训练(DRT)的效果。方法:29名40 ~ 60岁的高血压前期久坐男性分为三组:IRT组(n = 10)、DRT组(n = 9)和对照组(n = 10)。这两个项目都包括全身阻力训练,持续12周,每周3次,强度为动态一次最大重复测试(1RM)的60%。12周前后进行24小时血压监测、1RM力量和有氧适能评估。结果:IRT降低了24小时和白天的舒张压值。白天平均血压值降低(P < 0.05)。收缩压、舒张压、平均血压、心率、动脉僵硬指数在时间和组间无交互作用(P > 0.05)。与对照组相比,IRT增加了力量和有氧适能。然而,在强度方面,这些变化低于DRT (DRT:∆= 43.1±10.6% vs. IRT:∆= 24.1±7.1% vs. CON: Δ = 4.2±11.5%;P < 0.05)和有氧适能(DRT:∆= 22.9±10.7% vs. IRT:∆= 12.9±6.1% vs. CON: Δ = -2.1±7.4%;P < 0.01)。结论:全身IRT可降低舒张压和平均血压,而DRT组的降低无明显差异。IRT也增加了力量和有氧适应度,然而,这些变化低于DRT后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The experience of athletes with disabilities in mainstream sports: an interpretative phenomenological analysis Validity of the Polar V800 heart rate monitor for assessing cardiac autonomic control in individuals with spinal cord injury Normative values of handgrip strength in adolescents according to chronological age and sexual maturation Physiological and technical demands of the small-sided and generic games in female futsal players Monitoring of overtraining and motivation in elite soccer players
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1