Non –Traditional Security Approach in International relations :

Arun Teja Polcumpally
{"title":"Non –Traditional Security Approach in International relations :","authors":"Arun Teja Polcumpally","doi":"10.54945/jjia.v2i5.73","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper explores the phenomenon of Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS or IS) brides and tries to explain their role in global politics through the International Relations (IR) theories. Further, it argues that the approaches of critical securitization theory would be enriched by accommodating newer agencies into the explanatory models of IR. Historical agency considerations, the emancipation of the Islamic minorities in several countries, and deriving alternatives to the problem are much needed in the 21st century. With all such developments and the rapidly changing geopolitical dynamics, one must re-structure theories in understanding the changed geopolitics. It must answer how the nature and role of ISIS brides is critical in comprehending Middle-Eastern politics, European Islamophobia, etc. The factors mentioned above, even though considered in the traditional approaches, critical securitization theory provides an agency to them. Accordingly, the paper concludes that the critical theories are the product of decades of scientific debates and would be the priority framework to examine the international issues in future","PeriodicalId":188565,"journal":{"name":"Jindal Journal of International Affairs","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jindal Journal of International Affairs","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54945/jjia.v2i5.73","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper explores the phenomenon of Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS or IS) brides and tries to explain their role in global politics through the International Relations (IR) theories. Further, it argues that the approaches of critical securitization theory would be enriched by accommodating newer agencies into the explanatory models of IR. Historical agency considerations, the emancipation of the Islamic minorities in several countries, and deriving alternatives to the problem are much needed in the 21st century. With all such developments and the rapidly changing geopolitical dynamics, one must re-structure theories in understanding the changed geopolitics. It must answer how the nature and role of ISIS brides is critical in comprehending Middle-Eastern politics, European Islamophobia, etc. The factors mentioned above, even though considered in the traditional approaches, critical securitization theory provides an agency to them. Accordingly, the paper concludes that the critical theories are the product of decades of scientific debates and would be the priority framework to examine the international issues in future
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
国际关系中的非传统安全理念
本文探讨了伊拉克和叙利亚伊斯兰国(ISIS或IS)新娘的现象,并试图通过国际关系(IR)理论解释他们在全球政治中的作用。此外,本文还认为,将新的机构纳入IR的解释模型将丰富关键证券化理论的方法。在21世纪,历史机构的考虑,几个国家的伊斯兰少数民族的解放,以及对这个问题的替代方案是非常需要的。随着所有这些发展和快速变化的地缘政治动态,人们必须重新构建理论来理解变化的地缘政治。它必须回答ISIS新娘的性质和角色如何在理解中东政治,欧洲伊斯兰恐惧症等方面至关重要。上述因素,即使在传统方法中考虑,批判证券化理论也为它们提供了一种代理。因此,本文的结论是,批判理论是几十年科学辩论的产物,将是未来研究国际问题的优先框架
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Book Review: Drifts and Dynamics: Russia’s Ukraine War and Northeast Asia World Order and Shifting Regional Security Landscapes In the Era of Uncertainties - Middle Power Politics in a Multipolar World Book Review: How China sees India and the World Regionalism Vs Multilateralism
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1