Die Fraglichkeit der Technik oder Das Ge-rät

Hans-Dieter Bahr
{"title":"Die Fraglichkeit der Technik oder Das Ge-rät","authors":"Hans-Dieter Bahr","doi":"10.1515/zksp-2016-0002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Whoever attempts to understand the development of technique by divinely inspired human ingenuity or by the human need, desire, will to gain power, presupposes a subject as the master of technique. This point of view may lead to the erroneous conclusion that technical means would relate to ends and attainable goals like causes to effects. Regarded as means, however, techniques belong to the realm of possibility. They are means only if they can actually be used in one way or another. And this agility goes far beyond human governance. But, considered from a different point of view, namely, the German concept of Gerät (technical device; Rat: advice), technique might be rendered more understandable.","PeriodicalId":250691,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift für kritische Sozialtheorie und Philosophie","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zeitschrift für kritische Sozialtheorie und Philosophie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/zksp-2016-0002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Whoever attempts to understand the development of technique by divinely inspired human ingenuity or by the human need, desire, will to gain power, presupposes a subject as the master of technique. This point of view may lead to the erroneous conclusion that technical means would relate to ends and attainable goals like causes to effects. Regarded as means, however, techniques belong to the realm of possibility. They are means only if they can actually be used in one way or another. And this agility goes far beyond human governance. But, considered from a different point of view, namely, the German concept of Gerät (technical device; Rat: advice), technique might be rendered more understandable.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
的方法或者是合理的
无论谁试图通过神的启发来理解技术的发展,或者通过人类的需要、欲望、获得权力的意志来理解技术的发展,都是以技术的主人为前提的。这种观点可能导致错误的结论,即技术手段将涉及目的和可实现的目标,如因果关系。然而,作为手段,技术属于可能性的范畴。只有当它们能够以这样或那样的方式实际使用时,它们才是手段。这种敏捷性远远超出了人类治理的范畴。但是,从不同的角度考虑,即德国的概念Gerät(技术装置;老鼠:建议),技术可能会更容易理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Die Destruktion der Gesellschaftstheorie: Ernesto Laclaus und Chantal Mouffes Versuch einer nicht-essentialistischen Politischen Philosophie Ohne Form kein Inhalt Politics contra the functionalisation of man – Hannah Arendt’s problematic investigation of ideology and labour Between conflict and consensus: Why democracy needs conflicts and why communities should delimit their intensity Die „letzte Sinnlosigkeit“
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1