WHAT IS THE VALUE OF A HIP-SPECIFIC MRI IN THE MANAGEMENT OF PATIENTS WITH SYMPTOMATIC HIP DYSPLASIA UNDERGOING COMBINED HIP ARTHROSCOPY AND PERIACETABULAR OSTEOTOMY? A MULTICENTRE TRIAL

J. Verhaegen, Kenneth Milligan, I. Zaltz, M. Stover, Ernest L Sink, E. Belzile, J. Clohisy, S. Poitras, P. Beaulé
{"title":"WHAT IS THE VALUE OF A HIP-SPECIFIC MRI IN THE MANAGEMENT OF PATIENTS WITH SYMPTOMATIC HIP DYSPLASIA UNDERGOING COMBINED HIP ARTHROSCOPY AND PERIACETABULAR OSTEOTOMY? A MULTICENTRE TRIAL","authors":"J. Verhaegen, Kenneth Milligan, I. Zaltz, M. Stover, Ernest L Sink, E. Belzile, J. Clohisy, S. Poitras, P. Beaulé","doi":"10.1302/1358-992x.2023.11.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The gold standard treatment of hip dysplasia is a peri-acetabular osteotomy (PAO). Labral tears are seen in the majority of patients presenting with hip dysplasia and diagnosed using Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI). The goal was to (1) evaluate utility/value of MRI in patients undergoing hip arthroscopy at time of PAO, and (2) determine whether MRI findings of labral pathology can predict outcome.A prospective randomized controlled trial was conducted at tertiary institutions, comparing patients with hip dysplasia treated with isolated PAO versus PAO with adjunct hip arthroscopy. This study was a subgroup analysis on 74 patients allocated to PAO and adjunct hip arthroscopy (age 26±8 years; 89.2% females). All patients underwent radiographic and MRI assessment using a 1.5-Tesla with or 3-Tesla MRI without arthrography to detect labral or cartilage pathology. Clinical outcome was assessed using international Hip Outcome Tool-33 (iHOT).74% of patients (55/74) were pre-operatively diagnosed with a labral tear on MRI. Among these, 41 underwent labral treatment (74%); whilst among those without a labral tear on MRI, 42% underwent labral treatment (8/19). MRI had a high sensitivity (84%), but a low specificity (56%) for labral pathology (p=0.053). There was no difference in pre-operative (31.3±16.0 vs. 37.3±14.9; p=0.123) and post-operative iHOT (77.7±22.2 vs. 75.2±23.5; p=0.676) between patients with and without labral pathology on MRI.Value of MRI in the diagnostic work-up of a patient with hip dysplasia is limited. MRI had a high sensitivity (84%), but low specificity (44%) to identify labral pathology in patients with hip dysplasia. Consequently, standard clinical MRI had little value as a predictor of outcome with no differences in PROM scores between patients with and without a labral tear on MRI. Treatment of labral pathology in patients with hip dysplasia remains controversial. The results of this subgroup analysis of a prospective, multi-centre RCT do not show improved outcome among patients with dysplasia treated with labral repair.","PeriodicalId":193434,"journal":{"name":"Orthopaedic Proceedings","volume":"28 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Orthopaedic Proceedings","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1302/1358-992x.2023.11.004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The gold standard treatment of hip dysplasia is a peri-acetabular osteotomy (PAO). Labral tears are seen in the majority of patients presenting with hip dysplasia and diagnosed using Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI). The goal was to (1) evaluate utility/value of MRI in patients undergoing hip arthroscopy at time of PAO, and (2) determine whether MRI findings of labral pathology can predict outcome.A prospective randomized controlled trial was conducted at tertiary institutions, comparing patients with hip dysplasia treated with isolated PAO versus PAO with adjunct hip arthroscopy. This study was a subgroup analysis on 74 patients allocated to PAO and adjunct hip arthroscopy (age 26±8 years; 89.2% females). All patients underwent radiographic and MRI assessment using a 1.5-Tesla with or 3-Tesla MRI without arthrography to detect labral or cartilage pathology. Clinical outcome was assessed using international Hip Outcome Tool-33 (iHOT).74% of patients (55/74) were pre-operatively diagnosed with a labral tear on MRI. Among these, 41 underwent labral treatment (74%); whilst among those without a labral tear on MRI, 42% underwent labral treatment (8/19). MRI had a high sensitivity (84%), but a low specificity (56%) for labral pathology (p=0.053). There was no difference in pre-operative (31.3±16.0 vs. 37.3±14.9; p=0.123) and post-operative iHOT (77.7±22.2 vs. 75.2±23.5; p=0.676) between patients with and without labral pathology on MRI.Value of MRI in the diagnostic work-up of a patient with hip dysplasia is limited. MRI had a high sensitivity (84%), but low specificity (44%) to identify labral pathology in patients with hip dysplasia. Consequently, standard clinical MRI had little value as a predictor of outcome with no differences in PROM scores between patients with and without a labral tear on MRI. Treatment of labral pathology in patients with hip dysplasia remains controversial. The results of this subgroup analysis of a prospective, multi-centre RCT do not show improved outcome among patients with dysplasia treated with labral repair.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
髋关节特异性mri在联合髋关节镜和髋臼周围截骨术治疗有症状的髋关节发育不良患者中的价值是什么?多中心试验
髋部发育不良的金标准治疗是髋臼周围截骨术(PAO)。唇部撕裂可见于大多数髋关节发育不良患者,并使用磁共振成像(MRI)诊断。目的是(1)评估MRI在PAO患者接受髋关节镜检查时的效用/价值,以及(2)确定唇部病理的MRI结果是否可以预测预后。在高等院校进行了一项前瞻性随机对照试验,比较了单独PAO与辅助髋关节镜治疗的髋关节发育不良患者。本研究是一项亚组分析,74例患者被分配到PAO和辅助髋关节镜(年龄26±8岁;89.2%的女性)。所有患者都接受了影像学和MRI评估,使用1.5特斯拉或3特斯拉MRI不带关节造影来检测唇部或软骨病理。临床结果采用国际髋关节预后工具-33 (iHOT)进行评估。74%的患者(55/74)术前MRI诊断为唇部撕裂。其中41例接受了唇部治疗(74%);而在MRI上没有唇部撕裂的患者中,42%接受了唇部治疗(8/19)。MRI对唇部病理的敏感性高(84%),但特异性低(56%)(p=0.053)。术前差异无统计学意义(31.3±16.0∶37.3±14.9;p=0.123)和术后iHOT(77.7±22.2∶75.2±23.5;p=0.676)。MRI在髋关节发育不良患者诊断检查中的价值是有限的。MRI在识别髋关节发育不良患者的唇部病理方面具有高灵敏度(84%),但低特异性(44%)。因此,标准的临床MRI在预测预后方面几乎没有价值,在MRI上有和没有唇裂的患者之间的PROM评分没有差异。髋关节发育不良患者的唇部病理治疗仍有争议。这项前瞻性、多中心随机对照试验的亚组分析结果显示,接受唇部修复治疗的不典型增生患者的预后没有改善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
FIXING THE PERIPROSTHETIC FEMUR FRACTURE PROBLEM: ARE WE ABLE TO PROVIDE SAFE, EFFECTIVE, AND TIMELY CARE IN NORTH WALES? A PAN BETSI COLLABORATIVE STUDY THE LIST: TRANSFORMING THE ORTHOPAEDIC TRAUMA MANAGEMENT AND HANDOVER IN A SUSTAINABLE AND COST-NEUTRAL WAY OUTCOMES OF DISTAL FEMUR FRACTURE IN THE ELDERLY TREATED WITH EITHER SINGLE PLATE OR DUAL PLATING OR NAIL-PLATE COMBINATION: A RETROSPECTIVE ANALYSIS FROM A SINGLE CENTRE DOES PRE-HOSPITAL DELAY AFFECT OUTCOMES IN HIP FRACTURE PATIENTS? THE USE OF A TIBIA REDUCTION DEVICE IN THE TREATMENT OF FRACTURES UNDERGOING TIBIAL NAILING AT A DISTRICT GENERAL HOSPITAL: A PARALLEL CASE SERIES
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1