Pub Date : 2024-07-23DOI: 10.1302/1358-992x.2024.14.003
E. Kimber, J. Allman, D. Dasic, F. Wong, M. McCarthy
Retrospective study.To identify patient outcomes, in particular employment, >5-years following traumatic thoracolumbar fracture.235 patients between the ages of 18–65 were identified from the hospital radiology database having sustained a traumatic thoracolumbar fracture on CT or MRI between 01/01/2013 and 31/01/2017. Questionnaires were sent out via post and available emails, with a reminder letter and phone calls. Retrospective data was gathered about employment status pre-fracture and >5-years post injury.26 patients had died at follow up leaving 209 patients. 108 (52%) were treated surgically and 101 (48%) conservatively. 106 replies were received with 85 (80%) opting in and 21 (20%) opting out. 68 (80%) patients completed the full questionnaire with 17 (20%) filling out a shortened questionnaire via a phone conversation. 52 (61%) patients underwent surgery and 33 (39%) were treated conservatively. The average follow up was 8 years. Prior to injury 66 (78%) were employed and 19 (22%) unemployed (of which 6 were full time students and 8 were retired). 49 (74%) of the previously employed patients returned to work at follow up with 35 (53%) working the same or increased hours. Regarding employment, there was no significant difference between surgically and conservatively treated patients (P=0.355) or the classification of the fracture (P=0.303). 16 (19%) patients reported back pain prior to their injury whilst 69 (81%) did not. There were 58 (68%) cases of new pain at follow up with the most affected area being the lumbar region in 43 (51%) patients. 32 (38%) patients reported neurological deficit post injury: 19 with subjective symptoms, 9 with objective symptoms and 4 suffered paralysis.>5-years following a traumatic thoracolumbar fracture most individuals return to employment. There was no significant difference between the severity of the fracture or how patients are treated on their employment outcomes.
{"title":"EMPLOYMENT OUTCOMES FOLLOWING THORACOLUMBAR FRACTURES: LONG-TERM FOLLOW-UP GREATER THAN FIVE YEARS","authors":"E. Kimber, J. Allman, D. Dasic, F. Wong, M. McCarthy","doi":"10.1302/1358-992x.2024.14.003","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1302/1358-992x.2024.14.003","url":null,"abstract":"Retrospective study.To identify patient outcomes, in particular employment, >5-years following traumatic thoracolumbar fracture.235 patients between the ages of 18–65 were identified from the hospital radiology database having sustained a traumatic thoracolumbar fracture on CT or MRI between 01/01/2013 and 31/01/2017. Questionnaires were sent out via post and available emails, with a reminder letter and phone calls. Retrospective data was gathered about employment status pre-fracture and >5-years post injury.26 patients had died at follow up leaving 209 patients. 108 (52%) were treated surgically and 101 (48%) conservatively. 106 replies were received with 85 (80%) opting in and 21 (20%) opting out. 68 (80%) patients completed the full questionnaire with 17 (20%) filling out a shortened questionnaire via a phone conversation. 52 (61%) patients underwent surgery and 33 (39%) were treated conservatively. The average follow up was 8 years. Prior to injury 66 (78%) were employed and 19 (22%) unemployed (of which 6 were full time students and 8 were retired). 49 (74%) of the previously employed patients returned to work at follow up with 35 (53%) working the same or increased hours. Regarding employment, there was no significant difference between surgically and conservatively treated patients (P=0.355) or the classification of the fracture (P=0.303). 16 (19%) patients reported back pain prior to their injury whilst 69 (81%) did not. There were 58 (68%) cases of new pain at follow up with the most affected area being the lumbar region in 43 (51%) patients. 32 (38%) patients reported neurological deficit post injury: 19 with subjective symptoms, 9 with objective symptoms and 4 suffered paralysis.>5-years following a traumatic thoracolumbar fracture most individuals return to employment. There was no significant difference between the severity of the fracture or how patients are treated on their employment outcomes.","PeriodicalId":193434,"journal":{"name":"Orthopaedic Proceedings","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141813852","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-07-23DOI: 10.1302/1358-992x.2024.14.001
R. Jambulingam, J. Lloyd
Hip fractures cost the NHS £2 billion per annum. British guidelines within 36 hours of admission. However, these guidelines do not consider the time the patient spends between injury and admission. Our study aims to investigate pre-hospital time (PHT) and its effect on outcomes. Primary outcome measures were mortality, length of stay (LOS), pressure sores and abbreviated mental test scores (AMTS).Hip fracture data was retrospectively collected from our hospital IT system (Clinical Workstation) between February and August 2020. Admission data, ambulance timings, and outcome data was extracted. Statistical analysis was performed using GraphPad Prism V9.5.1.Two hundred eleven data sets were analysed. Mean age was 82.4, with 2:1 Females to males and median ASA of 3. The mean PHT was 690 minutes (85 to 6057). There was a positive correlation between increased PHT and mortality, though this did not reach statistical significance. There was a significant positive association between PHT and LOS (P=0.0027). Increased PHT was associated with lower admission AMTS (P<0.0001) and higher rate of pressure sore formation (P=0.0001). There was also a significantly positive correlation between PHT and time to mobility (P=0.049).There is an unobserved delay in hip fracture patients presenting to the hospital. Current treatment guidelines advocate early surgery but do not consider pre-hospital time. PHT in our patient population is 690 minutes on average, with increasing delay correlating with worse outcomes. Pre-hospital time should be considered when managing hip fracture patients with a view to expedite surgery and medical assessment.
{"title":"DOES PRE-HOSPITAL DELAY AFFECT OUTCOMES IN HIP FRACTURE PATIENTS?","authors":"R. Jambulingam, J. Lloyd","doi":"10.1302/1358-992x.2024.14.001","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1302/1358-992x.2024.14.001","url":null,"abstract":"Hip fractures cost the NHS £2 billion per annum. British guidelines within 36 hours of admission. However, these guidelines do not consider the time the patient spends between injury and admission. Our study aims to investigate pre-hospital time (PHT) and its effect on outcomes. Primary outcome measures were mortality, length of stay (LOS), pressure sores and abbreviated mental test scores (AMTS).Hip fracture data was retrospectively collected from our hospital IT system (Clinical Workstation) between February and August 2020. Admission data, ambulance timings, and outcome data was extracted. Statistical analysis was performed using GraphPad Prism V9.5.1.Two hundred eleven data sets were analysed. Mean age was 82.4, with 2:1 Females to males and median ASA of 3. The mean PHT was 690 minutes (85 to 6057). There was a positive correlation between increased PHT and mortality, though this did not reach statistical significance. There was a significant positive association between PHT and LOS (P=0.0027). Increased PHT was associated with lower admission AMTS (P<0.0001) and higher rate of pressure sore formation (P=0.0001). There was also a significantly positive correlation between PHT and time to mobility (P=0.049).There is an unobserved delay in hip fracture patients presenting to the hospital. Current treatment guidelines advocate early surgery but do not consider pre-hospital time. PHT in our patient population is 690 minutes on average, with increasing delay correlating with worse outcomes. Pre-hospital time should be considered when managing hip fracture patients with a view to expedite surgery and medical assessment.","PeriodicalId":193434,"journal":{"name":"Orthopaedic Proceedings","volume":"139 18","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141811008","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-07-23DOI: 10.1302/1358-992x.2024.14.012
V. Kandhari, S. Shetty, A. Nugur, S. Ghosh, A. Azam, D. Bhaskar, I. Malek
The recruitment drive, investment and collaboration within Betsi Cadwaladr University Health Board (BCUHB) sites providing specialist lower limb arthroplasty and trauma service has evolved over last few years with aims to improve patient care and reduce reliance on tertiary referral centres. Through our service-evaluation project, we reviewed the results of treatment provided for periprosthetic femur fractures (PPFFs) presenting to BCUHB sites over last 4 years.We retrospectively reviewed consecutive PPFFs admitted at three BCUHB sites from January’20 to June’23 with mean follow-up of 20.8 ± 13.2 (8–49) months [n=161; Mean age: 82.2 ± 8.5 (59–101) years, Females:107]. Over the review period we noted a 23% increase in service demand for care of PPFFs. Majority were managed surgically [132/161] [38 revision arthroplasties; 94 ORIFs] at BCUHB sites and two patients were referred to tertiary centre. Average time to surgery was 3.5 days. 90% of the PPFFs were managed successfully with 10% (16/159) having orthopaedic complications needing further intervention. 6.3 (10/159) had medical complications and did not need orthopaedic re-intervention. In our series, 12-month re-operation rate was 6.1% (8/132) and 1-month, 3-month and 1-year mortality rate was 6.3%, 11.3% and 21.4% respectively. These results are comparable to the published results of PPFF management at tertiary centres. Potential cost savings compared to transfer to tertiary centre for PPFF management was £2.31 million. Thus, it is possible to successfully provide adequate care for PPFFs at DGHs and efforts should be made to appropriately equip and adequately staff DGHs, to provide service for local PPFF care.
{"title":"FIXING THE PERIPROSTHETIC FEMUR FRACTURE PROBLEM: ARE WE ABLE TO PROVIDE SAFE, EFFECTIVE, AND TIMELY CARE IN NORTH WALES? A PAN BETSI COLLABORATIVE STUDY","authors":"V. Kandhari, S. Shetty, A. Nugur, S. Ghosh, A. Azam, D. Bhaskar, I. Malek","doi":"10.1302/1358-992x.2024.14.012","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1302/1358-992x.2024.14.012","url":null,"abstract":"The recruitment drive, investment and collaboration within Betsi Cadwaladr University Health Board (BCUHB) sites providing specialist lower limb arthroplasty and trauma service has evolved over last few years with aims to improve patient care and reduce reliance on tertiary referral centres. Through our service-evaluation project, we reviewed the results of treatment provided for periprosthetic femur fractures (PPFFs) presenting to BCUHB sites over last 4 years.We retrospectively reviewed consecutive PPFFs admitted at three BCUHB sites from January’20 to June’23 with mean follow-up of 20.8 ± 13.2 (8–49) months [n=161; Mean age: 82.2 ± 8.5 (59–101) years, Females:107]. Over the review period we noted a 23% increase in service demand for care of PPFFs. Majority were managed surgically [132/161] [38 revision arthroplasties; 94 ORIFs] at BCUHB sites and two patients were referred to tertiary centre. Average time to surgery was 3.5 days. 90% of the PPFFs were managed successfully with 10% (16/159) having orthopaedic complications needing further intervention. 6.3 (10/159) had medical complications and did not need orthopaedic re-intervention. In our series, 12-month re-operation rate was 6.1% (8/132) and 1-month, 3-month and 1-year mortality rate was 6.3%, 11.3% and 21.4% respectively. These results are comparable to the published results of PPFF management at tertiary centres. Potential cost savings compared to transfer to tertiary centre for PPFF management was £2.31 million. Thus, it is possible to successfully provide adequate care for PPFFs at DGHs and efforts should be made to appropriately equip and adequately staff DGHs, to provide service for local PPFF care.","PeriodicalId":193434,"journal":{"name":"Orthopaedic Proceedings","volume":"54 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141810455","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-07-23DOI: 10.1302/1358-992x.2024.14.014
A. Nugur, D. Wilkinson, S. Santhanam, A. Lal, H. Mumtaz, A. Goel
Distal femur fracture fixation in elderly presents significant challenges due to osteoporosis and associated comorbidities. There has been an evolution in the management of these fractures with a description of various surgical techniques and fixation methods; however, currently, there is no consensus on the standard of care. Non-union rates of up to 19% and mortality rates of up to 26 % at one year have been reported in the literature. Delay in surgery and delay in mobilisation post-operatively have been identified as two main factors for high rate of mortality. As biomechanical studies have proved better stability with dual plating or nail-plate combination, a trend has been shifting for past few years towards rigid fixation to allow early mobilisation. Our study aims to compare outcomes of distal femur fractures managed with either single plate (SP), dual plating (DP) or nail-plate construct (NP).A retrospective review of patients aged above 65 years with distal femur fractures (both native and peri-prosthetic) who underwent surgical management between June 2020 and May 2023 was conducted. Patients were divided into three groups based on mode of fixation - single plate or dual plating or nail-plate construct. AO/OTA classification was used for non-periprosthetic, and Unified classification system (UCS) was used for periprosthetic fractures. Data on patient demographics, fracture characteristics, surgical details, postoperative complications, re-operation rate, radiological outcomes and mortality rate were evaluated. Primary objective was to compare re-operation rate and mortality rate between 3 groups at 30 days, 6 months and at 1 year.A cohort of 32 patients with distal femur fractures were included in this study. 91% were females and mean age was 80.97 (range 68–97). 18 (53%) were non-periprosthetic fracture and 14 (47%) were periprosthetic fractures.18 patients underwent single plate fixation (AO/OTA 33A – 8, 33B/C – 2, UCS V3B – 5, V3C – 3),10 patients had dual plate fixation (AO/OTA 33A – 1, 33B/C – 4, UCS V3B – 3, V3C – 2) and 4 patients underwent nail-plate combination fixation (AO/OTA 33A – 4). 70.5% patients had surgery within 36 hours of admission and 90% within 48 hours. Analysis showed no re-operation at 30 days, 6 months in all 3 groups. At 1 year one patient had re-operation in dual-plating periprosthetic group (Distal femur replacement done for failed fixation). Three patients (16%) in single plate group had re-operation at 2 years (2 for peri-implant fracture and 1 for infection). None of the patients treated with Nail-plate combination had re-operation. Mortality rate at 30 days was 0% in among all the 3 groups. At 6 months, it was 16% in single plate group and 0% in DP and NP groups at 6 months and at 1 year mortality rate was 27% in SP group, 10% in DP and 0% in NP group. Combined mortality rate was 0% at 30 days, 9% at 6 months and 18.7% at one year.Our analysis provides insights into fixation methods of distal femur fractu
{"title":"OUTCOMES OF DISTAL FEMUR FRACTURE IN THE ELDERLY TREATED WITH EITHER SINGLE PLATE OR DUAL PLATING OR NAIL-PLATE COMBINATION: A RETROSPECTIVE ANALYSIS FROM A SINGLE CENTRE","authors":"A. Nugur, D. Wilkinson, S. Santhanam, A. Lal, H. Mumtaz, A. Goel","doi":"10.1302/1358-992x.2024.14.014","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1302/1358-992x.2024.14.014","url":null,"abstract":"Distal femur fracture fixation in elderly presents significant challenges due to osteoporosis and associated comorbidities. There has been an evolution in the management of these fractures with a description of various surgical techniques and fixation methods; however, currently, there is no consensus on the standard of care. Non-union rates of up to 19% and mortality rates of up to 26 % at one year have been reported in the literature. Delay in surgery and delay in mobilisation post-operatively have been identified as two main factors for high rate of mortality. As biomechanical studies have proved better stability with dual plating or nail-plate combination, a trend has been shifting for past few years towards rigid fixation to allow early mobilisation. Our study aims to compare outcomes of distal femur fractures managed with either single plate (SP), dual plating (DP) or nail-plate construct (NP).A retrospective review of patients aged above 65 years with distal femur fractures (both native and peri-prosthetic) who underwent surgical management between June 2020 and May 2023 was conducted. Patients were divided into three groups based on mode of fixation - single plate or dual plating or nail-plate construct. AO/OTA classification was used for non-periprosthetic, and Unified classification system (UCS) was used for periprosthetic fractures. Data on patient demographics, fracture characteristics, surgical details, postoperative complications, re-operation rate, radiological outcomes and mortality rate were evaluated. Primary objective was to compare re-operation rate and mortality rate between 3 groups at 30 days, 6 months and at 1 year.A cohort of 32 patients with distal femur fractures were included in this study. 91% were females and mean age was 80.97 (range 68–97). 18 (53%) were non-periprosthetic fracture and 14 (47%) were periprosthetic fractures.18 patients underwent single plate fixation (AO/OTA 33A – 8, 33B/C – 2, UCS V3B – 5, V3C – 3),10 patients had dual plate fixation (AO/OTA 33A – 1, 33B/C – 4, UCS V3B – 3, V3C – 2) and 4 patients underwent nail-plate combination fixation (AO/OTA 33A – 4). 70.5% patients had surgery within 36 hours of admission and 90% within 48 hours. Analysis showed no re-operation at 30 days, 6 months in all 3 groups. At 1 year one patient had re-operation in dual-plating periprosthetic group (Distal femur replacement done for failed fixation). Three patients (16%) in single plate group had re-operation at 2 years (2 for peri-implant fracture and 1 for infection). None of the patients treated with Nail-plate combination had re-operation. Mortality rate at 30 days was 0% in among all the 3 groups. At 6 months, it was 16% in single plate group and 0% in DP and NP groups at 6 months and at 1 year mortality rate was 27% in SP group, 10% in DP and 0% in NP group. Combined mortality rate was 0% at 30 days, 9% at 6 months and 18.7% at one year.Our analysis provides insights into fixation methods of distal femur fractu","PeriodicalId":193434,"journal":{"name":"Orthopaedic Proceedings","volume":"61 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141810645","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-07-23DOI: 10.1302/1358-992x.2024.14.015
T. Hossain, C. Kimberley, I. Starks, T. Barlow, D. Barlow
Malalignment is a common complication following tibial surgery, occurring in 10% of fractures. This is associated with prolonged healing time and non-union. It occurs due to inability to maintain a satisfactory reduction. A reduction device, such as the Staffordshire Orthopaedic Reduction Machine (STORM), permits the surgeon to manipulate the fracture and hold it reduced.A retrospective parallel case series was undertaken of all patients undergoing tibial nails over a six-year period from 2014 to 2021. Patient demographics were obtained from medical records. Operative times obtained from the theatre IT system and included the time patient entered theatre and surgical start and finish times for each case.Anteroposterior and lateral long leg post-operative radiographs were reviewed. Angulation was measured in both coronal and sagittal planes, by two separate orthopaedic surgeons. A reduction was classified to be ‘mal-aligned’ if the angle measured was greater than 5 degrees. One tailed unpaired t-test was used to compare alignment in each plane. Bony union was assessed on subsequent radiographs and was determined according to the Radiographic Union Score for Tibial Fractures31 patients underwent tibial nail during the time period. 8 patients were lost to follow up and were excluded. Of the remaining 23 patients, the STORM device was utilised in 11.The overall mean alignment was acceptable across all groups at 2.17° in the coronal plane and 2.56° in the saggital plane. Analysing each group individually demonstrated an improved alignment when STORM was utilised: 1.7° (1°–3°) vs 2.54° (0°–5°) for the coronal plane and 1.6° (0°–3°) vs 3.31° (0°–9°) in the saggital plane. This difference was significant in saggital alignment (p=0.03) and showed a positive trend in coronal alignment, although was not significant (p=0.08)The time in theatre was shorter in the control group with a mean of 113 minutes (65 to 219) in comparison to STORM with a mean of 140 minutes (105 to 180), an increased theatre time of 27 minutes (p=0.04).This study demonstrates that STORM can be used in the surgical treatment of tibial fractures resulting in improved fracture alignment with a modest increase in theatre time.
{"title":"THE USE OF A TIBIA REDUCTION DEVICE IN THE TREATMENT OF FRACTURES UNDERGOING TIBIAL NAILING AT A DISTRICT GENERAL HOSPITAL: A PARALLEL CASE SERIES","authors":"T. Hossain, C. Kimberley, I. Starks, T. Barlow, D. Barlow","doi":"10.1302/1358-992x.2024.14.015","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1302/1358-992x.2024.14.015","url":null,"abstract":"Malalignment is a common complication following tibial surgery, occurring in 10% of fractures. This is associated with prolonged healing time and non-union. It occurs due to inability to maintain a satisfactory reduction. A reduction device, such as the Staffordshire Orthopaedic Reduction Machine (STORM), permits the surgeon to manipulate the fracture and hold it reduced.A retrospective parallel case series was undertaken of all patients undergoing tibial nails over a six-year period from 2014 to 2021. Patient demographics were obtained from medical records. Operative times obtained from the theatre IT system and included the time patient entered theatre and surgical start and finish times for each case.Anteroposterior and lateral long leg post-operative radiographs were reviewed. Angulation was measured in both coronal and sagittal planes, by two separate orthopaedic surgeons. A reduction was classified to be ‘mal-aligned’ if the angle measured was greater than 5 degrees. One tailed unpaired t-test was used to compare alignment in each plane. Bony union was assessed on subsequent radiographs and was determined according to the Radiographic Union Score for Tibial Fractures31 patients underwent tibial nail during the time period. 8 patients were lost to follow up and were excluded. Of the remaining 23 patients, the STORM device was utilised in 11.The overall mean alignment was acceptable across all groups at 2.17° in the coronal plane and 2.56° in the saggital plane. Analysing each group individually demonstrated an improved alignment when STORM was utilised: 1.7° (1°–3°) vs 2.54° (0°–5°) for the coronal plane and 1.6° (0°–3°) vs 3.31° (0°–9°) in the saggital plane. This difference was significant in saggital alignment (p=0.03) and showed a positive trend in coronal alignment, although was not significant (p=0.08)The time in theatre was shorter in the control group with a mean of 113 minutes (65 to 219) in comparison to STORM with a mean of 140 minutes (105 to 180), an increased theatre time of 27 minutes (p=0.04).This study demonstrates that STORM can be used in the surgical treatment of tibial fractures resulting in improved fracture alignment with a modest increase in theatre time.","PeriodicalId":193434,"journal":{"name":"Orthopaedic Proceedings","volume":"126 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141811270","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-07-23DOI: 10.1302/1358-992x.2024.14.009
B. Jackson, C. Wilson, O. Blocker
Guidelines published by the British Association of Spine Surgeons (BASS) and Society of British Neurological Surgeons (SBNS) recommend urgent MRI imaging and intervention in individuals suspected of having CES. The need for an evidence based protocol is driven by a lack of 24/7 MRI services and centralisation of neurosurgery to tertiary centres, compounded by CES's significant medico-legal implications. We conducted an audit to evaluate the pathway for suspected CES in BCUHB West between 2018 and 2021.A retrospective audit of patients managed for suspected CES between 01/11/2018 and 01/05/2021 was performed, using the SBNS/BASS guidelines as the standard.A total of 252 patients received an emergency MRI for suspected CES between 2018 and 2021. 99% of patients were scanned in compliance with SBNS/BASS standards. Radiological evidence of CES was found in 18% of patients. 33% of emergency scans were performed by out-of-hours services. 4% of patients had repeated scans within the same 6-month period. The majority of referrals originated from Orthopaedics surgeons (78%), or staff in the Emergency Department (8%). 92% of ambulatory patients were not admitted to hospital. During the peak of the COVID-19 pandemic, referrals increased from 2.5 to 3.5 per week.SBNS/BASS standards were largely met, avoiding life changing disability and medico-legal consequences. The department should continue to follow SBNS/BASS guidance on the management of individuals with suspected CES. Challenges regarding the use of repeated scans should be addressed to avoid unnecessary costs. Introduction of new early recognition guidelines and Same Day Emergency Care (SDEC) has likely driven an increase in suspected CES referrals, and subsequent MRI demand. This audit should be utilised as an ongoing tool to ensure best practice continues, and to implement simple measures which may improve compliance with the pathway.
英国脊柱外科医生协会（BASS）和英国神经外科医生协会（SBNS）发布的指南建议对疑似 CES 患者进行紧急磁共振成像检查和干预。由于缺乏全天候磁共振成像服务，神经外科手术集中在三级中心进行，再加上 CES 对医疗法律的重大影响，因此需要制定以证据为基础的方案。我们进行了一项审计，以评估2018年至2021年期间北京大学人民医院西区疑似CES的治疗路径。我们以SBNS/BASS指南为标准，对2018年11月1日至2021年5月1日期间因疑似CES而接受治疗的患者进行了回顾性审计。2018年至2021年期间，共有252名患者因疑似CES而接受了急诊磁共振成像。99%的患者按照SBNS/BASS标准进行了扫描。18%的患者发现了CES的放射学证据。33%的急诊扫描是由非工作时间服务机构进行的。4%的患者在 6 个月内重复扫描。大部分转诊来自骨科外科医生（78%）或急诊科工作人员（8%）。92%的门诊病人没有住院。在 COVID-19 大流行的高峰期，转诊量从每周 2.5 例增加到 3.5 例。SBNS/BASS 标准在很大程度上得到了遵守，避免了改变生命的残疾和医疗法律后果。该部门应继续遵循 SBNS/BASS 关于疑似 CES 患者管理的指导。应解决重复扫描的使用问题，以避免不必要的费用。新的早期识别指南和当日急诊护理（SDEC）的引入很可能会导致疑似 CES 转诊病例的增加，以及随后的磁共振成像需求。应将此次审核作为一项持续性工具，以确保最佳实践得以延续，并实施简单的措施来改善路径的合规性。
{"title":"COMPLIANCE WITH THE SUSPECTED CAUDA EQUINA SYNDROME (CES) PATHWAY IN BETSI CADWALADR UNIVERSITY HEALTH BOARD (BCUHB) WEST: A RETROSPECTIVE AUDIT AGAINST NATIONAL STANDARDS","authors":"B. Jackson, C. Wilson, O. Blocker","doi":"10.1302/1358-992x.2024.14.009","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1302/1358-992x.2024.14.009","url":null,"abstract":"Guidelines published by the British Association of Spine Surgeons (BASS) and Society of British Neurological Surgeons (SBNS) recommend urgent MRI imaging and intervention in individuals suspected of having CES. The need for an evidence based protocol is driven by a lack of 24/7 MRI services and centralisation of neurosurgery to tertiary centres, compounded by CES's significant medico-legal implications. We conducted an audit to evaluate the pathway for suspected CES in BCUHB West between 2018 and 2021.A retrospective audit of patients managed for suspected CES between 01/11/2018 and 01/05/2021 was performed, using the SBNS/BASS guidelines as the standard.A total of 252 patients received an emergency MRI for suspected CES between 2018 and 2021. 99% of patients were scanned in compliance with SBNS/BASS standards. Radiological evidence of CES was found in 18% of patients. 33% of emergency scans were performed by out-of-hours services. 4% of patients had repeated scans within the same 6-month period. The majority of referrals originated from Orthopaedics surgeons (78%), or staff in the Emergency Department (8%). 92% of ambulatory patients were not admitted to hospital. During the peak of the COVID-19 pandemic, referrals increased from 2.5 to 3.5 per week.SBNS/BASS standards were largely met, avoiding life changing disability and medico-legal consequences. The department should continue to follow SBNS/BASS guidance on the management of individuals with suspected CES. Challenges regarding the use of repeated scans should be addressed to avoid unnecessary costs. Introduction of new early recognition guidelines and Same Day Emergency Care (SDEC) has likely driven an increase in suspected CES referrals, and subsequent MRI demand. This audit should be utilised as an ongoing tool to ensure best practice continues, and to implement simple measures which may improve compliance with the pathway.","PeriodicalId":193434,"journal":{"name":"Orthopaedic Proceedings","volume":"51 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141813345","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-07-23DOI: 10.1302/1358-992x.2024.14.008
A. Singh, B. C. Raulo, P. B. Das, A. Dash, N. Zeon
Femoral shaft fractures are fairly common injuries in paediatric age group. The treatment protocols are clear in patients of age less than 4 years and greater than 6 years. The real dilemma lies in the age group of 4–6 years. The aim of this study is to find whether a conservative line should be followed, or a more aggressive surgical intervention can provide significantly better results in these injuries.This study was conducted in a tertiary care hospital in Bhubaneswar, India from January 2020 to March 2021. A total of 40 patients with femur shaft fractures were included and randomly divided in two treatment groups. Group A were treated with a TENS nail while group B were treated with skin traction followed by spica cast. They were regularly followed up with clinical and radiological examination to look out for signs of healing and any complications. TENS was removed at 4–9 months’ time in all Group A patients.Group A patients had a statistically significant less hospital stay, immobilisation period, time to full weight bearing and radiological union. Rotational malunions were significantly lower in Group A (p-value 0.0379) while there was no statistically significant difference in angular malunion in coronal and sagittal plane at final follow up. Complications unique to group A were skin necrosis and infection.We conclude that TENS is better modality for treatment of shaft of femur fractures in patients of 4–6 years age as they significantly reduce the hospital stay, immobilization period and rotational malalignment.
{"title":"ROTATIONAL AND ANGULAR MALALIGNMENT FOLLOWING TITANIUM ELASTIC NAILING SYSTEM AND HIP SPICA CAST FOR FEMUR DIAPHYSEAL FRACTURES IN FOUR- TO SIX-YEAR-OLD CHILDREN: A RANDOMIZED PROSPECTIVE STUDY","authors":"A. Singh, B. C. Raulo, P. B. Das, A. Dash, N. Zeon","doi":"10.1302/1358-992x.2024.14.008","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1302/1358-992x.2024.14.008","url":null,"abstract":"Femoral shaft fractures are fairly common injuries in paediatric age group. The treatment protocols are clear in patients of age less than 4 years and greater than 6 years. The real dilemma lies in the age group of 4–6 years. The aim of this study is to find whether a conservative line should be followed, or a more aggressive surgical intervention can provide significantly better results in these injuries.This study was conducted in a tertiary care hospital in Bhubaneswar, India from January 2020 to March 2021. A total of 40 patients with femur shaft fractures were included and randomly divided in two treatment groups. Group A were treated with a TENS nail while group B were treated with skin traction followed by spica cast. They were regularly followed up with clinical and radiological examination to look out for signs of healing and any complications. TENS was removed at 4–9 months’ time in all Group A patients.Group A patients had a statistically significant less hospital stay, immobilisation period, time to full weight bearing and radiological union. Rotational malunions were significantly lower in Group A (p-value 0.0379) while there was no statistically significant difference in angular malunion in coronal and sagittal plane at final follow up. Complications unique to group A were skin necrosis and infection.We conclude that TENS is better modality for treatment of shaft of femur fractures in patients of 4–6 years age as they significantly reduce the hospital stay, immobilization period and rotational malalignment.","PeriodicalId":193434,"journal":{"name":"Orthopaedic Proceedings","volume":"98 18","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141812460","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-07-23DOI: 10.1302/1358-992x.2024.14.006
F. Mohammed, A. Soler
Trauma, across the United Kingdom, is managed using several software, paper based lists on Microsoft Word/Excel or Teams. There is usually poor handover or no handover in a standard format- during the on call, in the trauma meetings or in the wards. The software in the market for trauma management are not cost friendly or adaptable to local demands. The alternatives like Microsoft WORD based lists are fraught with their own problems. We endeavoured to make our trauma management effective.A Quality Improvement Project was done. The goals to achieve at end of a year were:Daily Trauma Handover in standardised format >90%Ward Handover in standardised format >90%Availability of outcomes of patients in clinic >80%Reduction of paper usage >90% at the end of six monthsAvailability of updated “outliers” information >90% at the weekend ward roundDocumentation from the Trauma Meeting > 90%On-Call documentation in standardised format >90%Doctor Satisfaction >75% in terms of: ease of us;, searchability of patient; ward round experience; morning trauma meeting experience; handover experience; inter-specialty communication; reliability; daily time saving; on-call time saving; patient care/safety; overall satisfaction.We used Microsoft Sharepoint List to manage our trauma workload and have named the tool as “The List”. The List has achieved all objectives as above in one year's time, except Outlier information which was at 67% in a recent PDSA (Plan-Do-Study-Act) cycle. The survey showed excellent doctor satisfaction and 90% respondents felt that The List saved an hour or more during the on-call and also during the ward rounds.We conclude that The List is a very powerful tool making trauma meetings efficient and handover effective. It is indigenous, adaptable, safe, sustainable, cost neutral and easy to use.
英国各地的外伤管理使用多种软件、基于 Microsoft Word/Excel 或 Teams 的纸质清单。在随叫随到、创伤会议或病房中，通常没有或没有以标准格式进行交接。市场上用于创伤管理的软件成本不高，也不能适应当地需求。微软 WORD 列表等替代软件也存在很多问题。我们努力提高创伤管理的效率。一年后要达到的目标是：以标准化格式进行的每日创伤交接>90%，以标准化格式进行的病房交接>90%，门诊病人治疗结果的可用性>80%，六个月后纸张使用量的减少>90%，周末查房时 "异常值 "信息更新的可用性>90%，创伤会议文件>90%，以标准化格式进行的值班文件>90%，医生满意度>75%：在以下方面的满意度>75%：方便使用；病人的可搜索性；查房体验；创伤晨会体验；交接班体验；专科间交流；可靠性；节省日常时间；节省待命时间；病人护理/安全；总体满意度。我们使用微软 Sharepoint 清单来管理创伤工作量，并将该工具命名为 "清单"。在一年的时间里，"清单 "实现了上述所有目标，除了 "离群信息"，在最近的 PDSA（计划-执行-研究-行动）周期中，"离群信息 "的比例为 67%。调查显示，医生的满意度非常高，90% 的受访者认为，在值班和查房期间，清单节省了一个小时或更多的时间。我们的结论是，"清单 "是一个非常强大的工具，它使创伤会诊更加高效，交接工作更加有效。
{"title":"THE LIST: TRANSFORMING THE ORTHOPAEDIC TRAUMA MANAGEMENT AND HANDOVER IN A SUSTAINABLE AND COST-NEUTRAL WAY","authors":"F. Mohammed, A. Soler","doi":"10.1302/1358-992x.2024.14.006","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1302/1358-992x.2024.14.006","url":null,"abstract":"Trauma, across the United Kingdom, is managed using several software, paper based lists on Microsoft Word/Excel or Teams. There is usually poor handover or no handover in a standard format- during the on call, in the trauma meetings or in the wards. The software in the market for trauma management are not cost friendly or adaptable to local demands. The alternatives like Microsoft WORD based lists are fraught with their own problems. We endeavoured to make our trauma management effective.A Quality Improvement Project was done. The goals to achieve at end of a year were:Daily Trauma Handover in standardised format >90%Ward Handover in standardised format >90%Availability of outcomes of patients in clinic >80%Reduction of paper usage >90% at the end of six monthsAvailability of updated “outliers” information >90% at the weekend ward roundDocumentation from the Trauma Meeting > 90%On-Call documentation in standardised format >90%Doctor Satisfaction >75% in terms of: ease of us;, searchability of patient; ward round experience; morning trauma meeting experience; handover experience; inter-specialty communication; reliability; daily time saving; on-call time saving; patient care/safety; overall satisfaction.We used Microsoft Sharepoint List to manage our trauma workload and have named the tool as “The List”. The List has achieved all objectives as above in one year's time, except Outlier information which was at 67% in a recent PDSA (Plan-Do-Study-Act) cycle. The survey showed excellent doctor satisfaction and 90% respondents felt that The List saved an hour or more during the on-call and also during the ward rounds.We conclude that The List is a very powerful tool making trauma meetings efficient and handover effective. It is indigenous, adaptable, safe, sustainable, cost neutral and easy to use.","PeriodicalId":193434,"journal":{"name":"Orthopaedic Proceedings","volume":"54 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141810456","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-07-23DOI: 10.1302/1358-992x.2024.14.004
R. H. R. Roberts, N. Shams, S. Ingram-Walpole, D. Barlow, A. Syed, Y. Joshi, I. Malek
Periprosthetic joint infections (PJIs) and osteosynthesis-associated infections (OSIs) present significant challenges in trauma and orthopaedic surgery, substantially impacting patient morbidity, mortality, and economic burden. This concern is heightened in patients with pre-existing comorbidities, such as diabetes mellitus, which are not always modifiable at presentation. A novel intraoperative strategy to prevent these infections is the use of Defensive Antibacterial Coating (DAC), a bio-absorbable antibiotic-containing hydrogel applied to implant surfaces at implantation, acting as a physical barrier to prevent infection.The purpose of this study is to assess the use of a commercially available hydrogel (DAC), highlighting its characteristics that make it suitable for managing PJIs and OSIs in orthopaedics and traumatology. Twenty-five patients who underwent complex orthopaedic procedures with intraoperative application of DAC between March 2022 and April 2023 at a single hospital site were included. Post-operative assessment encompassed clinical, laboratory, and radiographic examinations.In this study, 25 patients were included, with a mean age of 70 ± 14.77 years and an average ASA grade of 2.46 ± 0.78. The cohort presented an average Charleston Comorbidity score of 5.45 ± 2.24. The procedures included 8 periprosthetic fractures, 8 foot and ankle surgeries, 5 upper limb surgeries, and 4 elective hip and knee surgeries. Follow-up assessments at 6 weeks and 6 months revealed no evidence of PJI or OSI in any patients, nor were any treatments for PJI or OSI required during the interim period.DAC demonstrated efficacy in preventing infections in high-risk patients undergoing complex orthopaedic procedures. Our findings warrant further investigation into the use of DAC in complex hosts with randomized control trials.
{"title":"INTRAOPERATIVE USE OF DEFENSIVE ANTIBACTERIAL COATING (DAC) FOR COMPLEX SURGERIES IN COMPLEX HOSTS","authors":"R. H. R. Roberts, N. Shams, S. Ingram-Walpole, D. Barlow, A. Syed, Y. Joshi, I. Malek","doi":"10.1302/1358-992x.2024.14.004","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1302/1358-992x.2024.14.004","url":null,"abstract":"Periprosthetic joint infections (PJIs) and osteosynthesis-associated infections (OSIs) present significant challenges in trauma and orthopaedic surgery, substantially impacting patient morbidity, mortality, and economic burden. This concern is heightened in patients with pre-existing comorbidities, such as diabetes mellitus, which are not always modifiable at presentation. A novel intraoperative strategy to prevent these infections is the use of Defensive Antibacterial Coating (DAC), a bio-absorbable antibiotic-containing hydrogel applied to implant surfaces at implantation, acting as a physical barrier to prevent infection.The purpose of this study is to assess the use of a commercially available hydrogel (DAC), highlighting its characteristics that make it suitable for managing PJIs and OSIs in orthopaedics and traumatology. Twenty-five patients who underwent complex orthopaedic procedures with intraoperative application of DAC between March 2022 and April 2023 at a single hospital site were included. Post-operative assessment encompassed clinical, laboratory, and radiographic examinations.In this study, 25 patients were included, with a mean age of 70 ± 14.77 years and an average ASA grade of 2.46 ± 0.78. The cohort presented an average Charleston Comorbidity score of 5.45 ± 2.24. The procedures included 8 periprosthetic fractures, 8 foot and ankle surgeries, 5 upper limb surgeries, and 4 elective hip and knee surgeries. Follow-up assessments at 6 weeks and 6 months revealed no evidence of PJI or OSI in any patients, nor were any treatments for PJI or OSI required during the interim period.DAC demonstrated efficacy in preventing infections in high-risk patients undergoing complex orthopaedic procedures. Our findings warrant further investigation into the use of DAC in complex hosts with randomized control trials.","PeriodicalId":193434,"journal":{"name":"Orthopaedic Proceedings","volume":"123 32","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141811979","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-07-23DOI: 10.1302/1358-992x.2024.14.005
F. Mohammed, S. Jones, Z. Mansoor, S. Mehta, S. Rathore, A. Azam
Paget's disease of bone (PDB) is characterised by increased bone resorption and development of an erratic bone structure that is highly fragile and susceptible to fracture. In addition, altered joint biomechanics lead to arthritis, more often in the hip and pelvis, resulting in disability and a Total hip Arthroplasty (THA) may be required. THA in PDB is associated with more complications compared to normal population. There is no consensus on the type of arthroplasty that performs better in people with PDB. To our knowledge, there is no meta-analysis in literature on this rare problem.We undertook a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the effectiveness of cemented versus cementless THA in patients with PDB. PRISMA guidelines were followed. Search strings were generated based on Boolean operators for identification of the reference articles.31 studies were included overall. Revision rate was lower in the cementless group compared to the cemented group (chi square=4.36, p=0.04), aseptic loosening was lesser in the cementless group compared to the cemented group (chi square=4.13, p=0.04). The type of the arthroplasty did not affect the infection rate (chi square=2.51, p=0.11), pre and post op Harris Hip Score showed statistically significant difference, but there was no difference between types of arthroplastyWe conclude that THA with uncemented components is better and provided lower revision and aseptic loosening when compared to cemented groups in patients with PDB.
{"title":"TOTAL HIP ARTHROPLASTY IN PAGET'S DISEASE: COMPARISON OF OUTCOMES AFTER CEMENTED VERSUS UNCEMENTED ARTHROPLASTY. A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS","authors":"F. Mohammed, S. Jones, Z. Mansoor, S. Mehta, S. Rathore, A. Azam","doi":"10.1302/1358-992x.2024.14.005","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1302/1358-992x.2024.14.005","url":null,"abstract":"Paget's disease of bone (PDB) is characterised by increased bone resorption and development of an erratic bone structure that is highly fragile and susceptible to fracture. In addition, altered joint biomechanics lead to arthritis, more often in the hip and pelvis, resulting in disability and a Total hip Arthroplasty (THA) may be required. THA in PDB is associated with more complications compared to normal population. There is no consensus on the type of arthroplasty that performs better in people with PDB. To our knowledge, there is no meta-analysis in literature on this rare problem.We undertook a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the effectiveness of cemented versus cementless THA in patients with PDB. PRISMA guidelines were followed. Search strings were generated based on Boolean operators for identification of the reference articles.31 studies were included overall. Revision rate was lower in the cementless group compared to the cemented group (chi square=4.36, p=0.04), aseptic loosening was lesser in the cementless group compared to the cemented group (chi square=4.13, p=0.04). The type of the arthroplasty did not affect the infection rate (chi square=2.51, p=0.11), pre and post op Harris Hip Score showed statistically significant difference, but there was no difference between types of arthroplastyWe conclude that THA with uncemented components is better and provided lower revision and aseptic loosening when compared to cemented groups in patients with PDB.","PeriodicalId":193434,"journal":{"name":"Orthopaedic Proceedings","volume":"111 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141811813","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：