Comparison of Clustering Algorithms for Learning Analytics with Educational Datasets

Álvaro Martínez Navarro, P. Moreno-Ger
{"title":"Comparison of Clustering Algorithms for Learning Analytics with Educational Datasets","authors":"Álvaro Martínez Navarro, P. Moreno-Ger","doi":"10.9781/ijimai.2018.02.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Learning Analytics is becoming a key tool for the analysis and improvement of digital education processes, and \nits potential benefit grows with the size of the student cohorts generating data. In the context of Open Education, \nthe potentially massive student cohorts and the global audience represent a great opportunity for significant \nanalyses and breakthroughs in the field of learning analytics. However, these potentially huge datasets require \nproper analysis techniques, and different algorithms, tools and approaches may perform better in this specific \ncontext. In this work, we compare different clustering algorithms using an educational dataset. We start by \nidentifying the most relevant algorithms in Learning Analytics and benchmark them to determine, according to \ninternal validation and stability measurements, which algorithms perform better. We analyzed seven algorithms, \nand determined that K-means and PAM were the best performers among partition algorithms, and DIANA was \nthe best performer among hierarchical algorithms","PeriodicalId":143152,"journal":{"name":"Int. J. Interact. Multim. Artif. Intell.","volume":"89 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"32","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Int. J. Interact. Multim. Artif. Intell.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.9781/ijimai.2018.02.003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 32

Abstract

Learning Analytics is becoming a key tool for the analysis and improvement of digital education processes, and its potential benefit grows with the size of the student cohorts generating data. In the context of Open Education, the potentially massive student cohorts and the global audience represent a great opportunity for significant analyses and breakthroughs in the field of learning analytics. However, these potentially huge datasets require proper analysis techniques, and different algorithms, tools and approaches may perform better in this specific context. In this work, we compare different clustering algorithms using an educational dataset. We start by identifying the most relevant algorithms in Learning Analytics and benchmark them to determine, according to internal validation and stability measurements, which algorithms perform better. We analyzed seven algorithms, and determined that K-means and PAM were the best performers among partition algorithms, and DIANA was the best performer among hierarchical algorithms
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
学习分析与教育数据集聚类算法的比较
学习分析正在成为分析和改进数字教育过程的关键工具,它的潜在效益随着生成数据的学生群体的规模而增长。在开放教育的背景下,潜在的庞大的学生群体和全球受众代表了学习分析领域的重大分析和突破的巨大机会。然而,这些潜在的庞大数据集需要适当的分析技术,不同的算法、工具和方法可能在这种特定环境下表现更好。在这项工作中,我们使用一个教育数据集比较了不同的聚类算法。我们首先确定学习分析中最相关的算法,并根据内部验证和稳定性测量来确定哪些算法表现更好。我们分析了7种算法,确定K-means和PAM是分区算法中性能最好的,DIANA是分层算法中性能最好的
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Yield Curve as a Recession Leading Indicator. An Application for Gradient Boosting and Random Forest Variational Learning for the Inverted Beta-Liouville Mixture Model and Its Application to Text Categorization Why the Future Might Actually Need Us: A Theological Critique of the 'Humanity-As-Midwife-For-Artificial-Superintelligence' Proposal Artificial Canaries: Early Warning Signs for Anticipatory and Democratic Governance of AI Music Boundary Detection using Convolutional Neural Networks: A comparative analysis of combined input features
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1