BUNIN AND GOGOL: UKRAINIAN FACTOR, OR BETWEEN ORYOL REGION AND PROVENCE

Y. Barabash
{"title":"BUNIN AND GOGOL: UKRAINIAN FACTOR, OR BETWEEN ORYOL REGION AND PROVENCE","authors":"Y. Barabash","doi":"10.33608/0236-1477.2021.04.3-22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The gap as long as several decades between I. Bunin’s different opinions of Gogol’s personality and writings — from youthful admiration and feeling of emotional and spiritual proximity to the confession of ‘hatred’ in a diary note of emigrant times — has been considered both as historical-literary fact and psychological mysterious phenomenon. The key problem determining the angle of an analytical approach to the topic is the role and significance of the ‘Ukrainian factor’ in Bunin’s biography and literary art, his interest and affection towards Ukraine, its people, nature, history, traditions, and culture, which was testified by the writer’s confessions and became the subject of research in the Ukrainian scholarly discourse and journalism (E. Malaniuk). In that light, the stories by Bunin based on his traveling around Ukraine, the parts of the novel “Аrseniev’s life”, memoir and epistolary materials have been analyzed in the paper. Special attention has been paid to Bunin’s tender attitude towards T. Shevchenko, his creative works and his personality. It was Shevchenko’s poetry as well as “A Terrible Revenge” and “The Old-World Landowners” by Gogol that revealed Ukraine to young Bunin, entering his conscience and creative imagination. As to the later Bunin’s negative attitude towards Gogol, the decisive factors were dissimilarity of both writers’ personal and psychological features and difference of their creative methods and poetics, connected with the change of historical and literary paradigm. In particular, Gogol was the forerunner to modernism from which Bunin stayed away.","PeriodicalId":370928,"journal":{"name":"Слово і Час","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Слово і Час","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33608/0236-1477.2021.04.3-22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The gap as long as several decades between I. Bunin’s different opinions of Gogol’s personality and writings — from youthful admiration and feeling of emotional and spiritual proximity to the confession of ‘hatred’ in a diary note of emigrant times — has been considered both as historical-literary fact and psychological mysterious phenomenon. The key problem determining the angle of an analytical approach to the topic is the role and significance of the ‘Ukrainian factor’ in Bunin’s biography and literary art, his interest and affection towards Ukraine, its people, nature, history, traditions, and culture, which was testified by the writer’s confessions and became the subject of research in the Ukrainian scholarly discourse and journalism (E. Malaniuk). In that light, the stories by Bunin based on his traveling around Ukraine, the parts of the novel “Аrseniev’s life”, memoir and epistolary materials have been analyzed in the paper. Special attention has been paid to Bunin’s tender attitude towards T. Shevchenko, his creative works and his personality. It was Shevchenko’s poetry as well as “A Terrible Revenge” and “The Old-World Landowners” by Gogol that revealed Ukraine to young Bunin, entering his conscience and creative imagination. As to the later Bunin’s negative attitude towards Gogol, the decisive factors were dissimilarity of both writers’ personal and psychological features and difference of their creative methods and poetics, connected with the change of historical and literary paradigm. In particular, Gogol was the forerunner to modernism from which Bunin stayed away.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
布宁和果戈里:乌克兰因素,或介于奥廖尔地区和普罗旺斯之间
布宁对果戈理性格和作品的不同看法之间长达几十年的差距——从年轻时的钦佩和情感和精神上的接近,到移民时期日记中对“仇恨”的忏悔——既被认为是历史文学事实,也被认为是心理上的神秘现象。决定分析方法角度的关键问题是“乌克兰因素”在布宁传记和文学艺术中的作用和意义,他对乌克兰的兴趣和感情,乌克兰的人民,自然,历史,传统和文化,这在作者的自白中得到证实,并成为乌克兰学术话语和新闻学的研究主题(E. Malaniuk)。在此基础上,本文对布宁的乌克兰旅行故事、小说《Аrseniev’s life》的部分内容、回忆录和书信体材料进行了分析。特别值得注意的是布宁对舍甫琴科的温柔态度,他的创造性作品和他的个性。舍甫琴科的诗歌以及果戈理的《可怕的复仇》和《旧世界的地主》向年轻的布宁展示了乌克兰,进入了他的良知和创造性的想象。至于后期布宁对果戈理的否定态度,其决定性因素是作家个人特征和心理特征的不同,创作方法和诗学的不同,以及历史和文学范式的变化。果戈理是现代主义的先驱,而布宁却远离他。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
OLD UKRAINIAN MYTHOLOGY IN OLEH OLZHYCH’S LYRICS DUBIA TEXTS IN THE ACADEMIC EDITION OF TARAS SHEVCHENKO’S WORKS: THE PROBLEM OF AUTHORSHIP ROMA AS A MATRIX OF THE ‘OTHER’IN THE PROJECTION OF ORIENTALISM, RACE, AND NATION IN THE WORKS BY OLHA KOBYLIANSKA THE MYTHOLOGICAL SPACE OF GOOD AND EVIL IN “THE YELLOW PRINCE” BY VASYL BARKA JENS PETER JAKOBSEN'S NOVELLA “MOGENS” TRANSLATED BY OLHA KOBYLIANSKA: TEXT AND CONTEXTS
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1