Lexikala analyser av muntlig, tangentbordsskriven och dikterad text producerad av barn med stavningssvårigheter

Sanna Kraft, Fredrik Thurfjell, John Rack, Åsa Wengelin
{"title":"Lexikala analyser av muntlig, tangentbordsskriven och dikterad text producerad av barn med stavningssvårigheter","authors":"Sanna Kraft, Fredrik Thurfjell, John Rack, Åsa Wengelin","doi":"10.23865/njlr.v5.1511","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"For barn med stavningssvarigheter ar skriftsprakande en stor utmaning och behovet att hitta nya redskap for att understodja deras skriftspraksutveckling ar darfor stort. Att skriva med taligenkanning, diktering, skulle kunna underlatta skrivprocessen eftersom dikteringsverktyget reducerar kraven pa skribenten att stava sjalv, och detta skulle darmed kunna frigora kognitiva resurser till annan textbearbetning. Att diktera text innebar emellertid inte med nodvandighet en enklare textproduktion; dels behover texten folja skriftspraksnormer trots att den produceras muntligt, dels behover skribenten hitta strategier for att hantera tillfallen nar verktyget inte uppfattar talet korrekt. I foreliggande studie undersoks text producerad av barn med stavningssvarigheter. Lexikala egenskaper, textlangd och stavfel studeras i muntlig, skriven och dikterad text. Analyserna visar att de dikterade texterna innehaller farre stavfel an de skrivna samt att bade skriven och dikterad text har hogre lexikal densitet och hogre andel langa ord jamfort med muntlig text. Detta antyder att deltagarna klarar att diktera texter med skriftsprakliga egenskaper. Daremot skiljde sig dikterad text varken fran muntlig eller skriven text gallande textlangd eller lexikal diversitet. Var slutsats ar att dikteringsverktyg kan anvandas for att underlatta skrivprocessen for barn med stavningssvarigheter, men det behovs vidare forskning som studerar hur olika undergrupper producerar text med dikteringsverktyg. \nAbstract \nLexical analyses of oral, typed and dictated text produced by children with spelling difficulties \nFor children with reading and writing difficulties, writing, in general, and spelling, in particular, is a significant challenge. Writing with speech recognition (dictation) can facilitate the writing process since the dictation tool removes the need to spell, freeing resources for other processes. Dictating, however, may not always provide a solution, since written text should follow the conventions of written language, even when produced orally. In addition, writers need strategies if the tool does not recognize the spoken words.In the present study, children with spelling difficulties produced keyboard-written and dictated texts, and an oral account. The analyses showed that dictated texts, as expected, contained fewer spelling errors than keyboard-written texts, and that both of these had a higher lexical density than the oral accounts. This suggests that students are able to dictate using written language conventions. However, the dictated texts did not differ from the oral and keyboard-written texts in terms of length of text and proportion of long words. Our conclusion is that the dictation tool can be used to facilitate the children’s writing process, but further research is needed to see if training in the use of the tool would bring more substantial benefits.","PeriodicalId":315285,"journal":{"name":"Nordic Journal of Literacy Research","volume":"63 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nordic Journal of Literacy Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23865/njlr.v5.1511","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

For barn med stavningssvarigheter ar skriftsprakande en stor utmaning och behovet att hitta nya redskap for att understodja deras skriftspraksutveckling ar darfor stort. Att skriva med taligenkanning, diktering, skulle kunna underlatta skrivprocessen eftersom dikteringsverktyget reducerar kraven pa skribenten att stava sjalv, och detta skulle darmed kunna frigora kognitiva resurser till annan textbearbetning. Att diktera text innebar emellertid inte med nodvandighet en enklare textproduktion; dels behover texten folja skriftspraksnormer trots att den produceras muntligt, dels behover skribenten hitta strategier for att hantera tillfallen nar verktyget inte uppfattar talet korrekt. I foreliggande studie undersoks text producerad av barn med stavningssvarigheter. Lexikala egenskaper, textlangd och stavfel studeras i muntlig, skriven och dikterad text. Analyserna visar att de dikterade texterna innehaller farre stavfel an de skrivna samt att bade skriven och dikterad text har hogre lexikal densitet och hogre andel langa ord jamfort med muntlig text. Detta antyder att deltagarna klarar att diktera texter med skriftsprakliga egenskaper. Daremot skiljde sig dikterad text varken fran muntlig eller skriven text gallande textlangd eller lexikal diversitet. Var slutsats ar att dikteringsverktyg kan anvandas for att underlatta skrivprocessen for barn med stavningssvarigheter, men det behovs vidare forskning som studerar hur olika undergrupper producerar text med dikteringsverktyg. Abstract Lexical analyses of oral, typed and dictated text produced by children with spelling difficulties For children with reading and writing difficulties, writing, in general, and spelling, in particular, is a significant challenge. Writing with speech recognition (dictation) can facilitate the writing process since the dictation tool removes the need to spell, freeing resources for other processes. Dictating, however, may not always provide a solution, since written text should follow the conventions of written language, even when produced orally. In addition, writers need strategies if the tool does not recognize the spoken words.In the present study, children with spelling difficulties produced keyboard-written and dictated texts, and an oral account. The analyses showed that dictated texts, as expected, contained fewer spelling errors than keyboard-written texts, and that both of these had a higher lexical density than the oral accounts. This suggests that students are able to dictate using written language conventions. However, the dictated texts did not differ from the oral and keyboard-written texts in terms of length of text and proportion of long words. Our conclusion is that the dictation tool can be used to facilitate the children’s writing process, but further research is needed to see if training in the use of the tool would bring more substantial benefits.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Dialoguing on a Graphic Novel in the Language Learning Classroom with Upper Secondary School Students Att introducera och tillgängliggöra ämnesbegrepp i samhällskunskapsundervisning Læreres oppfatninger om å skrive seg til lesing med digital lydstøtte (STL+) Sambandet mellan läsförståelseresultat i PISA och nationella prov: En fråga om motivation i prov där konsekvenserna är små respektive stora Fagsamtalen under muntlig eksamen og hvilke krav den stiller til elevenes muntlige kompetanse
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1