Increasing perceived predation risk through playbacks reduces Red-winged Blackbird abundance in agriculture late in the breeding season

Janice K. Enos, Emma B. Smith, Martin P. Ward, J. Swaddle, Mark E. Hauber
{"title":"Increasing perceived predation risk through playbacks reduces Red-winged Blackbird abundance in agriculture late in the breeding season","authors":"Janice K. Enos, Emma B. Smith, Martin P. Ward, J. Swaddle, Mark E. Hauber","doi":"10.1093/ornithapp/duad034","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Perceived predation and brood parasitism risks strongly influence nesting habitat selection for several bird species. Here we report on a playback experiment evaluating whether perceived predation or brood parasitism risk can reduce Red-winged Blackbird (Agelaius phoeniceus) abundances in agricultural nesting habitat. We broadcast Cooper’s Hawk vocalizations (Accipiter cooperii, a predator of adult blackbirds and nests), Brown-headed Cowbird vocalizations (Molothrus ater, a brood parasite of many passerine species, including blackbirds), and the “Sonic Net” as treatments, the latter of which is broadcast of frequencies that overlap with blackbird vocalizations and prevent blackbirds from accessing intraspecific communication systems informing predator and brood parasite risks. Neither the hawk, cowbird, nor Sonic Net treatments reduced blackbird abundances at sites early in the breeding season (April to May), when blackbirds were selecting nesting habitat. In contrast, late in the breeding season (July to August), hawk vocalizations and the Sonic Net reduced blackbird abundances at sites, but cowbird vocalizations did not. Our late-breeding season results suggest that blackbirds may flexibly change responses to perceived predation risk based on their stage of reproductive investment. Perceived predation risk could potentially be used to manage pest birds that nest in agricultural landscapes, at least for crops that are vulnerable to birds late in the breeding season.","PeriodicalId":125764,"journal":{"name":"Ornithological Applications","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ornithological Applications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ornithapp/duad034","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Perceived predation and brood parasitism risks strongly influence nesting habitat selection for several bird species. Here we report on a playback experiment evaluating whether perceived predation or brood parasitism risk can reduce Red-winged Blackbird (Agelaius phoeniceus) abundances in agricultural nesting habitat. We broadcast Cooper’s Hawk vocalizations (Accipiter cooperii, a predator of adult blackbirds and nests), Brown-headed Cowbird vocalizations (Molothrus ater, a brood parasite of many passerine species, including blackbirds), and the “Sonic Net” as treatments, the latter of which is broadcast of frequencies that overlap with blackbird vocalizations and prevent blackbirds from accessing intraspecific communication systems informing predator and brood parasite risks. Neither the hawk, cowbird, nor Sonic Net treatments reduced blackbird abundances at sites early in the breeding season (April to May), when blackbirds were selecting nesting habitat. In contrast, late in the breeding season (July to August), hawk vocalizations and the Sonic Net reduced blackbird abundances at sites, but cowbird vocalizations did not. Our late-breeding season results suggest that blackbirds may flexibly change responses to perceived predation risk based on their stage of reproductive investment. Perceived predation risk could potentially be used to manage pest birds that nest in agricultural landscapes, at least for crops that are vulnerable to birds late in the breeding season.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过回放增加被捕食的风险,减少了繁殖季节后期农业中的红翼黑鸟数量
感知到的捕食和雏鸟寄生风险强烈影响了几种鸟类的筑巢栖息地选择。在此,我们报告了一项回放实验,评估了感知捕食或幼虫寄生风险是否会降低红翅黑鸟(Agelaius phoeniceus)在农业筑巢栖息地的丰度。我们广播库珀鹰的叫声(库珀鹰,成年黑鸟和巢穴的捕食者),褐头牛鹂的叫声(Molothrus ater,许多雀鸟物种的幼虫寄生虫,包括黑鸟),以及“声波网”作为治疗方法,后者的广播频率与黑鸟的叫声重叠,防止黑鸟进入种内通信系统,告知捕食者和幼虫寄生虫的风险。在繁殖季节早期(4月至5月),当黑鸟选择筑巢栖息地时,鹰、牛鹂和声波网处理都没有减少黑鸟的丰度。相比之下,在繁殖季节后期(7月至8月),鹰的叫声和声波网减少了黑鸟的丰度,但牛鹂的叫声没有。我们的研究结果表明,黑鹂可以根据其生殖投资阶段灵活地改变对感知捕食风险的反应。感知到的捕食风险可以潜在地用于管理在农业景观中筑巢的有害鸟类,至少对于在繁殖季节后期易受鸟类侵害的作物来说是这样。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Cellular network measurements can unravel spatiotemporal properties of bird movement to enhance basic and applied knowledge globally Cellular network measurements can unravel spatiotemporal properties of bird movement to enhance basic and applied knowledge globally The Amazon Basin’s rivers and lakes support Nearctic-breeding shorebirds during southward migration Two listeners detect slightly more birds than a single listener when interpreting acoustic recordings Despite short-lived changes, COVID-19 pandemic had minimal large-scale impact on citizen science participation in India
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1