Unfolding Borders: For a Semiotics of Essayistic Border Images

Laura Rascaroli
{"title":"Unfolding Borders: For a Semiotics of Essayistic Border Images","authors":"Laura Rascaroli","doi":"10.31009/cc.2022.v10.i18.03","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Problematic ideological strategies of in/visibility are played out today around borders by exploiting advanced image-making technologies and hegemonic media discourses that produce “thin” border images lacking in semiotic complexity. This article responds to calls to move beyond the “line in the sand” metaphor by investigating essay films that experiment with a performative relationship with the border. Their “borderwork” is self-reflexive to the point of becoming a form of theory. To elucidate this theorization of the border, I invoke Derrida’s limitrophic method of “thickening” the limit, mediated via Deleuze’s notion of the fold. By comparing three case studies—Armin Linke’s Alpi (2011), Philip Scheffner’s Havarie (2016), and Tadhg O’Sullivan’s The Great Wall (2015)—I interrogate the strategies that essay films employ to operationalize borders. The article is a first attempt at a semiotic classification of film-essayistic border images, and a contribution to the understanding of essay film as limitrophic audiovisual thinking.","PeriodicalId":414949,"journal":{"name":"Comparative Cinema","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Comparative Cinema","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31009/cc.2022.v10.i18.03","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Problematic ideological strategies of in/visibility are played out today around borders by exploiting advanced image-making technologies and hegemonic media discourses that produce “thin” border images lacking in semiotic complexity. This article responds to calls to move beyond the “line in the sand” metaphor by investigating essay films that experiment with a performative relationship with the border. Their “borderwork” is self-reflexive to the point of becoming a form of theory. To elucidate this theorization of the border, I invoke Derrida’s limitrophic method of “thickening” the limit, mediated via Deleuze’s notion of the fold. By comparing three case studies—Armin Linke’s Alpi (2011), Philip Scheffner’s Havarie (2016), and Tadhg O’Sullivan’s The Great Wall (2015)—I interrogate the strategies that essay films employ to operationalize borders. The article is a first attempt at a semiotic classification of film-essayistic border images, and a contribution to the understanding of essay film as limitrophic audiovisual thinking.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
展开边界:对散文体边界意象的符号学研究
今天,利用先进的图像制作技术和霸权媒体话语,在边界周围发挥了有问题的意识形态策略,这些策略产生了缺乏符号学复杂性的“薄”边界图像。本文通过调查实验与边界的表演关系的散文电影,回应了超越“沙地上的线”隐喻的呼吁。他们的“边界工作”是自反的,以至于成为一种理论形式。为了阐明这种边界的理论化,我引用德里达的“增厚”极限的有限性方法,通过德勒兹的褶皱概念进行调解。通过比较三个案例研究——阿明·林克的《阿尔皮》(2011年)、菲利普·舍夫纳的《哈维尔》(2016年)和塔格·奥沙利文的《长城》(2015年)——我探讨了散文电影在运作边界方面所采用的策略。本文首次尝试对电影-散文式的边界影像进行符号学分类,有助于将散文式电影理解为一种有限的视听思维。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Nature of Ostension Un cine geológico. Tiempos y estética fósiles en el documental Río Turbio (2020) de Tatiana Mazú González Cine-Ecologies and the Temporality of a Radical Cinematic Production Rethinking Extractivism and Masculinity: Aesthetics of the Environment in There Will Be Blood (2007) and First Cow (2019) Unsettling Assemblages: Anxiety and Materiality in La Ciénaga (Martel, 2001) and Distancia de rescate (Llosa, 2021)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1