Power consumption evaluation of circuit-switched versus packet-switched optical backbone networks

Ward Van Heddeghem, B. Lannoo, D. Colle, M. Pickavet, F. Musumeci, A. Pattavina, F. Idzikowski
{"title":"Power consumption evaluation of circuit-switched versus packet-switched optical backbone networks","authors":"Ward Van Heddeghem, B. Lannoo, D. Colle, M. Pickavet, F. Musumeci, A. Pattavina, F. Idzikowski","doi":"10.1109/OnlineGreenCom.2013.6731029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"While telecommunication networks have historically been dominated by a circuit-switched paradigm, the last decades have seen a clear trend towards packet-switched networks. In this paper we evaluate how both paradigms perform in optical backbone networks from a power consumption point of view, and whether the general agreement of circuit switching being more power-efficient holds. We consider artificially generated topologies of various sizes, mesh degrees and-not yet previously explored in this context-transport linerates. We cross-validate our findings with a number of realistic topologies. Our results show that, as a generalization, packet switching can become preferable when the traffic demands are lower than half the transport linerate. We find that an increase in the network node count does not consistently increase the energy savings of circuit switching over packet switching, but is heavily influenced by the mesh degree and (to a minor extent) by the average link length.","PeriodicalId":152857,"journal":{"name":"2013 IEEE Online Conference on Green Communications (OnlineGreenComm)","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"15","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2013 IEEE Online Conference on Green Communications (OnlineGreenComm)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/OnlineGreenCom.2013.6731029","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

Abstract

While telecommunication networks have historically been dominated by a circuit-switched paradigm, the last decades have seen a clear trend towards packet-switched networks. In this paper we evaluate how both paradigms perform in optical backbone networks from a power consumption point of view, and whether the general agreement of circuit switching being more power-efficient holds. We consider artificially generated topologies of various sizes, mesh degrees and-not yet previously explored in this context-transport linerates. We cross-validate our findings with a number of realistic topologies. Our results show that, as a generalization, packet switching can become preferable when the traffic demands are lower than half the transport linerate. We find that an increase in the network node count does not consistently increase the energy savings of circuit switching over packet switching, but is heavily influenced by the mesh degree and (to a minor extent) by the average link length.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
电路交换与分组交换光骨干网络的功耗评估
虽然电信网络在历史上一直由电路交换范例主导,但过去几十年已经看到了分组交换网络的明显趋势。在本文中,我们从功耗的角度评估了这两种范式在光骨干网络中的表现,以及电路交换更节能的一般协议是否成立。我们考虑人工生成的各种大小、网格度的拓扑,以及尚未在此上下文中探索的传输线。我们用一些实际的拓扑交叉验证了我们的发现。我们的结果表明,一般来说,当流量需求低于传输带宽的一半时,分组交换更可取。我们发现,网络节点数的增加并不总是增加电路交换比分组交换的节能,而是受到网格度和(在较小程度上)平均链路长度的严重影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A weighted fair queuing algorithm for charging electric vehicles on a smart grid Methods to evaluate the performance of multiple uncooperative users for green cognitive radio networks The EDISON project: Enhanced energy saving solution for lighting using DC power supply Joint delay and power control in single-server queueing systems A power scheduling game for reducing the peak demand of residential users
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1