2nd international workshop on living with inconsistency

S. Easterbrook, M. Chechik
{"title":"2nd international workshop on living with inconsistency","authors":"S. Easterbrook, M. Chechik","doi":"10.1145/505532.505552","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In software engineering, there has long been a recognition that inconsistency is a fact of life. Evolving descriptions of software artefacts are frequently inconsistent, and tolerating this inconsistency is important if flexible collaborative working is to be supported. This workshop will focus on reasoning in the presence of inconsistency, for a wide range of software engineering activities, such as building and exploring requirements models, validating specifications, verifying correctness of implementations, monitoring runtime behaviour, and analyzing development processes. A particular interest is on how existing automated approaches such as model checking, theorem proving, logic programming, and model-based reasoning can still be applied in the presence of inconsistency.","PeriodicalId":374824,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Software Engineering. ICSE 2001","volume":"50 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2001-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"17","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Software Engineering. ICSE 2001","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/505532.505552","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 17

Abstract

In software engineering, there has long been a recognition that inconsistency is a fact of life. Evolving descriptions of software artefacts are frequently inconsistent, and tolerating this inconsistency is important if flexible collaborative working is to be supported. This workshop will focus on reasoning in the presence of inconsistency, for a wide range of software engineering activities, such as building and exploring requirements models, validating specifications, verifying correctness of implementations, monitoring runtime behaviour, and analyzing development processes. A particular interest is on how existing automated approaches such as model checking, theorem proving, logic programming, and model-based reasoning can still be applied in the presence of inconsistency.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
第二届不一致生活国际研讨会
在软件工程中,人们早就认识到不一致性是生活中的一个事实。软件工件的描述经常是不一致的,如果要支持灵活的协作工作,容忍这种不一致是很重要的。这个研讨会将集中于在不一致的情况下进行推理,用于广泛的软件工程活动,例如构建和探索需求模型,验证规范,验证实现的正确性,监视运行时行为,以及分析开发过程。特别感兴趣的是如何在存在不一致的情况下仍然应用现有的自动化方法,如模型检查、定理证明、逻辑编程和基于模型的推理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Maintenance support tools for Java programs: CCFinder and JAAT (W18) 1st workshop on open source software engineering Consistent group membership in ad hoc networks A scalable formal method for design and automatic checking of user interfaces An empirical study of global software development: distance and speed
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1