What literature does to our emotions, and how do we know? Empirical studies will tell

W. Peer, A. Chesnokova
{"title":"What literature does to our emotions, and how do we know? Empirical studies will tell","authors":"W. Peer, A. Chesnokova","doi":"10.28925/2311-259X.2019.1.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The general feeling of malaise, if not crisis, in Literary Studies forces us to urgently look for solutions that will bring the discipline forward. This article is a call for a concentration on fundamental issues in the study of literature, and at the same time for a more rigorous and accountable methodology in studying both the content and the form of literary texts as well as readers’ reactions to them.Some illustrations of work in the area of Empirical Study of Literature are provided, showing how fiction is a powerful regulator of human emotion, especially by formal features of the text. Case 1 reports a study which looks at the influence of narrative perspective (internal focalization in the first place) on judgements of readers. Case 2 delves into the textual ingredients by which readers’ absorption in a narrative world is enhanced. These ingredients are foremost of a kind that goes under the name of “foregrounding” devices in literary studies. The conclusion from the research is that texts that are rich in foregrounding are better able to elicit a more complex response, i.e., a more powerful impact, from readers. In its turn Case 3 looks at how readers react to literary pieces dealing with deep human suffering. The findings indicate that literature is able to evoke strong feelings of empathy through its formal make-up. The results also support the argument that one’s exposure to literature is the main variable to have an impact on prosocial behaviour, irrespective of personality, gender, age or social situation.Thus we claim that literary texts exert a powerful influence on readers’ value sharing, absorption and empathy, and the impact can only be studied empirically. The article shows a way out of the current crisis, not by just opening up a new fashion, in which literary texts are “interpreted” in yet another way, mostly academically, but by taking literary texts seriously in their workings on the minds and hearts of readers — which is ultimately what texts are written for.","PeriodicalId":127913,"journal":{"name":"Synopsis: Text, Context, Media","volume":"90 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Synopsis: Text, Context, Media","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.28925/2311-259X.2019.1.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

The general feeling of malaise, if not crisis, in Literary Studies forces us to urgently look for solutions that will bring the discipline forward. This article is a call for a concentration on fundamental issues in the study of literature, and at the same time for a more rigorous and accountable methodology in studying both the content and the form of literary texts as well as readers’ reactions to them.Some illustrations of work in the area of Empirical Study of Literature are provided, showing how fiction is a powerful regulator of human emotion, especially by formal features of the text. Case 1 reports a study which looks at the influence of narrative perspective (internal focalization in the first place) on judgements of readers. Case 2 delves into the textual ingredients by which readers’ absorption in a narrative world is enhanced. These ingredients are foremost of a kind that goes under the name of “foregrounding” devices in literary studies. The conclusion from the research is that texts that are rich in foregrounding are better able to elicit a more complex response, i.e., a more powerful impact, from readers. In its turn Case 3 looks at how readers react to literary pieces dealing with deep human suffering. The findings indicate that literature is able to evoke strong feelings of empathy through its formal make-up. The results also support the argument that one’s exposure to literature is the main variable to have an impact on prosocial behaviour, irrespective of personality, gender, age or social situation.Thus we claim that literary texts exert a powerful influence on readers’ value sharing, absorption and empathy, and the impact can only be studied empirically. The article shows a way out of the current crisis, not by just opening up a new fashion, in which literary texts are “interpreted” in yet another way, mostly academically, but by taking literary texts seriously in their workings on the minds and hearts of readers — which is ultimately what texts are written for.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
文学对我们的情感有什么影响,我们是怎么知道的?实证研究将告诉我们
文学研究中的普遍不安感,如果不是危机感,迫使我们迫切地寻找解决方案,使这门学科向前发展。本文呼吁关注文学研究的基本问题,同时在研究文学文本的内容和形式以及读者对文学文本的反应时,需要一种更严格、更负责任的方法。提供了一些文学实证研究领域的作品插图,展示了小说是如何强有力地调节人类情感的,特别是通过文本的正式特征。案例1报告了一项研究,该研究着眼于叙事视角(首先是内部聚焦)对读者判断的影响。案例2深入探讨了文本成分,通过这些成分,读者在叙事世界中的注意力得以增强。这些因素是文学研究中最重要的一种“前景”手段。该研究的结论是,前景丰富的文本更能引起读者更复杂的反应,即更强大的影响。案例3则考察读者对描写人类苦难的文学作品的反应。研究结果表明,文学能够通过其正式的化妆唤起强烈的同理心。研究结果还支持了这样一种观点,即一个人接触文学是影响亲社会行为的主要变量,与个性、性别、年龄或社会环境无关。因此,我们认为文学文本对读者的价值分享、吸收和共情具有强大的影响,这种影响只能通过实证来研究。这篇文章展示了一条摆脱当前危机的出路,不是通过开辟一种新的时尚,在这种时尚中,文学文本以另一种方式“解释”,主要是学术上的,而是通过认真对待文学文本在读者的思想和心灵上的作用——这是文本写作的最终目的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The nature culture of popular laughter and the phenomenon of low culture (the baroque period) in Ukraine Genre peculiarities of the Christmas story “Brother Stutterer’s Christmas” by Dzvinka Matiiash Thematic groups of the phraseologisms in the Borys Grinchenko's works What literature does to our emotions, and how do we know? Empirical studies will tell Artistic reception of the «city — steppe» dichotomy in the historical novels of P. Zahrebelnyi, R. Ivanchenko and P. Uhliarenko
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1