What Things Are Good?

D. Phillips
{"title":"What Things Are Good?","authors":"D. Phillips","doi":"10.1093/OSO/9780190602185.003.0004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter focuses on Ross’s moderate pluralism about the good. Though it is less original than his moderate pluralism about the right, it is argued that there is much to be said for his version: his list of basic intrinsic goods—happiness, virtue, knowledge—is a plausible starting list. And much of what he says about virtue and about the value of knowledge is also plausible. There is, however, another aspect of Ross’s treatment which it is argued is wholly mistaken: a persistent impulse to downgrade happiness relative to virtue. This radical antihedonism takes different forms in The Right and the Good and the Foundations; but both forms are misconceived.","PeriodicalId":267783,"journal":{"name":"Rossian Ethics","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rossian Ethics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/OSO/9780190602185.003.0004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This chapter focuses on Ross’s moderate pluralism about the good. Though it is less original than his moderate pluralism about the right, it is argued that there is much to be said for his version: his list of basic intrinsic goods—happiness, virtue, knowledge—is a plausible starting list. And much of what he says about virtue and about the value of knowledge is also plausible. There is, however, another aspect of Ross’s treatment which it is argued is wholly mistaken: a persistent impulse to downgrade happiness relative to virtue. This radical antihedonism takes different forms in The Right and the Good and the Foundations; but both forms are misconceived.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
什么东西是好的?
本章重点讨论罗斯关于善的适度多元主义。尽管它不如他关于权利的温和多元主义那么具有原创性,但有人认为他的版本有很多可说之处:他的基本内在善的清单——幸福、美德、知识——是一个合理的起始清单。他所说的美德和知识的价值也有很多道理。然而,罗斯的观点的另一个方面被认为是完全错误的:一种将幸福相对于美德贬低的持久冲动。这种激进的反享乐主义在《权利与善》和《基础》中表现为不同的形式;但这两种形式都是错误的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Metaethical and Epistemological Framework What Things Are Good? What Prima Facie Duties Are There? What Are Prima Facie Duties?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1