Interplay of group dynamics and science talk in a design based classroom

A. Bopardikar, Dana Gnesdilow, S. Puntambekar
{"title":"Interplay of group dynamics and science talk in a design based classroom","authors":"A. Bopardikar, Dana Gnesdilow, S. Puntambekar","doi":"10.3115/1599503.1599526","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This exploratory study investigated the interplay between science discourse and group dynamics of two groups of 6th graders over time as they learned in a technology-rich, inquiry-based science environment. Analysis showed that the group with problematic dynamics engaged in less science talk and failed to improve over time. Despite dynamics and dialogue differences between groups, both groups primarily focused on procedural aspects instead of science. Future studies of group collaboration over time are discussed.","PeriodicalId":120843,"journal":{"name":"International Conference on Computer Supported Collaborative Learning","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-06-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Conference on Computer Supported Collaborative Learning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3115/1599503.1599526","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This exploratory study investigated the interplay between science discourse and group dynamics of two groups of 6th graders over time as they learned in a technology-rich, inquiry-based science environment. Analysis showed that the group with problematic dynamics engaged in less science talk and failed to improve over time. Despite dynamics and dialogue differences between groups, both groups primarily focused on procedural aspects instead of science. Future studies of group collaboration over time are discussed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于设计的课堂中群体动力学与科学讨论的相互作用
本探索性研究调查了两组六年级学生在技术丰富、探究性的科学环境中学习的科学话语与群体动力学之间的相互作用。分析表明,动力有问题的那一组较少参与科学谈话,而且随着时间的推移也没有改善。尽管两组之间的动态和对话存在差异,但两组都主要关注程序方面,而不是科学。讨论了小组合作的未来研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Understanding Teachers' Collaboration for Designing Technology-Enhanced Learning Predicting Success in Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) Using Cohesion Network Analysis Identification of Patterns of Tool Use and Sketching Practices in a Learning By Design Task Phases of Design: Following Idea Development and Patterns of Collaborative Discussion in a Learning By Design Project Discovering Dependencies: A Case Study of Collaborative Dynamic Mathematics
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1