ANALYSIS OF RETRACTED PUBLICATIONS FROM KAZAKHSTAN

B. Koçyiğit, Ahmet Akyol
{"title":"ANALYSIS OF RETRACTED PUBLICATIONS FROM KAZAKHSTAN","authors":"B. Koçyiğit, Ahmet Akyol","doi":"10.47316/cajmhe.2022.3.2.04","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Retraction is a mechanism to prevent the dissemination of erroneous, misleading, or biased data and information. Various factors can cause retraction. In this article, we focused on Kazakhstan data and aimed to present an analysis of retracted publications from Kazakhstan. \nMethods: Data for this descriptive cross-sectional article were obtained from the 'Retraction Watch’ database without time restriction. Among the country selections, 'Kazakhstan,' 'Tajikistan,' 'Uzbekistan,' 'Kyrgyzstan,' and 'Turkmenistan' were chosen, and the number of retracted articles was recorded. For detailed analysis, Kazakhstan data were focused on and further analyses were performed on Kazakhstan data. Article title, authors, time interval (in days) from publication to retraction, date of retraction, source of publication, subject area of publication, publication type, and retraction reason were recorded in an Excel file. \nResults: The number of retracted publications was detected as 64 from Kazakhstan, 49 from Tajikistan, 17 from Uzbekistan, 12 from Kyrgyzstan, and 1 from Turkmenistan. Kazakhstan data were as follows: The median time interval between publication date and retraction date was 475 (46 - 2074) days. Retraction reasons were listed as: Plagiarism (n = 22), peer review issues (n = 21), duplication (n = 11), author disagreements and conflict (n = 5), error (n = 5), fraud (n = 2), ethical issues ( n = 1), publication issues (n = 1), and unknown (n = 1). The three areas with the most retracted articles were engineering (n = 22), education (n = 21), and technology (n = 12). \nConclusion: Kazakhstan was first among the five Central Asian countries in terms of the number of retracted publications. Plagiarism, peer review issues, and duplication were at the forefront of the retraction reasons. There is a need for approaches to increase the knowledge of researchers in Kazakhstan about the retraction reasons and ethical research conditions.","PeriodicalId":388483,"journal":{"name":"Central Asian Journal of Medical Hypotheses and Ethics","volume":"175 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Central Asian Journal of Medical Hypotheses and Ethics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47316/cajmhe.2022.3.2.04","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Introduction: Retraction is a mechanism to prevent the dissemination of erroneous, misleading, or biased data and information. Various factors can cause retraction. In this article, we focused on Kazakhstan data and aimed to present an analysis of retracted publications from Kazakhstan. Methods: Data for this descriptive cross-sectional article were obtained from the 'Retraction Watch’ database without time restriction. Among the country selections, 'Kazakhstan,' 'Tajikistan,' 'Uzbekistan,' 'Kyrgyzstan,' and 'Turkmenistan' were chosen, and the number of retracted articles was recorded. For detailed analysis, Kazakhstan data were focused on and further analyses were performed on Kazakhstan data. Article title, authors, time interval (in days) from publication to retraction, date of retraction, source of publication, subject area of publication, publication type, and retraction reason were recorded in an Excel file. Results: The number of retracted publications was detected as 64 from Kazakhstan, 49 from Tajikistan, 17 from Uzbekistan, 12 from Kyrgyzstan, and 1 from Turkmenistan. Kazakhstan data were as follows: The median time interval between publication date and retraction date was 475 (46 - 2074) days. Retraction reasons were listed as: Plagiarism (n = 22), peer review issues (n = 21), duplication (n = 11), author disagreements and conflict (n = 5), error (n = 5), fraud (n = 2), ethical issues ( n = 1), publication issues (n = 1), and unknown (n = 1). The three areas with the most retracted articles were engineering (n = 22), education (n = 21), and technology (n = 12). Conclusion: Kazakhstan was first among the five Central Asian countries in terms of the number of retracted publications. Plagiarism, peer review issues, and duplication were at the forefront of the retraction reasons. There is a need for approaches to increase the knowledge of researchers in Kazakhstan about the retraction reasons and ethical research conditions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对哈萨克斯坦撤回出版物的分析
引言:撤稿是一种防止错误、误导或有偏见的数据和信息传播的机制。各种各样的因素都可能导致收缩。在本文中,我们将重点放在哈萨克斯坦的数据上,并旨在对哈萨克斯坦撤回的出版物进行分析。方法:这篇描述性横断面文章的数据来自“撤稿观察”数据库,没有时间限制。在选定的国家中,选择了“哈萨克斯坦”、“塔吉克斯坦”、“乌兹别克斯坦”、“吉尔吉斯斯坦”、“土库曼斯坦”,并记录了撤回文章的数量。为了进行详细分析,重点关注了哈萨克斯坦的数据,并对哈萨克斯坦的数据进行了进一步分析。在Excel文件中记录文章标题、作者、从发表到撤稿的时间间隔(天)、撤稿日期、发表来源、发表主题领域、发表类型、撤稿原因。结果:哈萨克斯坦64篇,塔吉克斯坦49篇,乌兹别克斯坦17篇,吉尔吉斯斯坦12篇,土库曼斯坦1篇。哈萨克斯坦的数据如下:发表日期和撤稿日期之间的中位时间间隔为475(46 - 2074)天。撤稿原因包括:抄袭(n = 22)、同行评审问题(n = 21)、重复(n = 11)、作者分歧和冲突(n = 5)、错误(n = 5)、欺诈(n = 2)、伦理问题(n = 1)、出版问题(n = 1)和未知(n = 1)。撤稿最多的三个领域分别是工程(n = 22)、教育(n = 21)和技术(n = 12)。结论:在撤回出版物的数量方面,哈萨克斯坦在中亚五国中排名第一。抄袭、同行评议问题和重复是撤稿的主要原因。需要找到方法来增加哈萨克斯坦研究人员对撤稿原因和伦理研究条件的了解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
JANUS KINASE INHIBITORS FOR RELAPSING POLYCHONDRITIS TREATMENT: A HYPOTHESIS HYPERTROPHIC OSTEOARTHROPATHY IN A PATIENT WITH HETEROZYGOUS MUTATION IN THE SLCO2A1 GENE: A CASE REPORT MANUSCRIPTS WITH FAKE CHATGPT-CREATED REFERENCES: A CASE STUDY PREDATORY PUBLISHING AND WASTE OF RESOURCE MY LIFE AS AN EDITOR AND CONSULTANT OF MEDICAL JOURNALS
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1