Large decompressive craniectomy combined with vascular reconstruction in patients with severe craniocerebral injury

Xipeng Wang, Feng Ruan, Ping Liu
{"title":"Large decompressive craniectomy combined with vascular reconstruction in patients with severe craniocerebral injury","authors":"Xipeng Wang, Feng Ruan, Ping Liu","doi":"10.4103/2468-5585.221877","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: This study aims to compare the effect of large decompressive craniectomy combined with vascular reconstruction and traditional decompressive craniectomy in the treatment of severe craniocerebral injury. Methods: Forty-eight cases of severe craniocerebral injury were collected from March 2012 to March 2015 in Liyuan Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology. Patients undergoing large decompressive craniectomy combined with vascular reconstruction or traditional decompressive craniectomy were randomly divided into two groups: the experimental group and the control group. The hemodynamic changes were observed by computed tomography perfusion, and the postoperative Glasgow Outcome Score (GOS) was analyzed. Results: The cerebral blood flow (CBF) and cerebral blood volume (CBV) scores in experimental group were higher than that in the control group at 1 week and 1 month after the operation (P < 0.05). The mean transit time (MTT) and time to peak (TTP) scores in experimental group were lower than that in the control group at 1 week and 1 month after the operation (P < 0.05). The relative CBF and relative CBV values of the control group in 1 week were higher than that in 1 month, while the relative MTT and relative TTP values in 1 week were lower than that in 1 month. The rate of good recovery (including good and residual cases) in experimental group was higher than that in the control group whereas the rate of poor recovery (including severe disability, vegetative state, and death) in experimental group was lower than that in the control group (P < 0.05). Conclusion: The large decompressive craniectomy combined with vascular reconstruction can not only decrease intracranial pressure but also recover the blood supply of the brain. It deserves the clinical promotion.","PeriodicalId":102077,"journal":{"name":"Translational Surgery","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Translational Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/2468-5585.221877","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Aim: This study aims to compare the effect of large decompressive craniectomy combined with vascular reconstruction and traditional decompressive craniectomy in the treatment of severe craniocerebral injury. Methods: Forty-eight cases of severe craniocerebral injury were collected from March 2012 to March 2015 in Liyuan Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology. Patients undergoing large decompressive craniectomy combined with vascular reconstruction or traditional decompressive craniectomy were randomly divided into two groups: the experimental group and the control group. The hemodynamic changes were observed by computed tomography perfusion, and the postoperative Glasgow Outcome Score (GOS) was analyzed. Results: The cerebral blood flow (CBF) and cerebral blood volume (CBV) scores in experimental group were higher than that in the control group at 1 week and 1 month after the operation (P < 0.05). The mean transit time (MTT) and time to peak (TTP) scores in experimental group were lower than that in the control group at 1 week and 1 month after the operation (P < 0.05). The relative CBF and relative CBV values of the control group in 1 week were higher than that in 1 month, while the relative MTT and relative TTP values in 1 week were lower than that in 1 month. The rate of good recovery (including good and residual cases) in experimental group was higher than that in the control group whereas the rate of poor recovery (including severe disability, vegetative state, and death) in experimental group was lower than that in the control group (P < 0.05). Conclusion: The large decompressive craniectomy combined with vascular reconstruction can not only decrease intracranial pressure but also recover the blood supply of the brain. It deserves the clinical promotion.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
重型颅脑损伤大椎体减压术联合血管重建的疗效观察
目的:比较大骨瓣减压联合血管重建与传统骨瓣减压治疗重型颅脑损伤的疗效。方法:收集2012年3月至2015年3月华中科技大学同济医学院附属梨园医院收治的重型颅脑损伤患者48例。将行大骨瓣减压手术联合血管重建或传统骨瓣减压手术的患者随机分为实验组和对照组。通过计算机断层扫描灌注观察血流动力学变化,并分析术后格拉斯哥预后评分(GOS)。结果:实验组患者术后1周、1个月脑血流量(CBF)、脑血容量(CBV)评分均高于对照组(P < 0.05)。实验组术后1周和1个月的平均转运时间(MTT)和到达高峰时间(TTP)评分均低于对照组(P < 0.05)。对照组患者1周的相对CBF、相对CBV值均高于1个月,1周的相对MTT、相对TTP值均低于1个月。试验组患者良好恢复率(包括良好病例和残废病例)高于对照组,不良恢复率(包括重度残疾、植物人状态和死亡)低于对照组(P < 0.05)。结论:大椎体减压术联合血管重建术既能降低颅内压,又能恢复脑血供。值得临床推广。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Principles and clinical applications of computational fluid dynamics in aneurysms of the abdominal aorta Animal models in experimental abdominal aortic aneurysm Current application of endovascular interventions in surgical management of carotid body tumor Renovascular hypertension after laparoscopic adrenalectomy in a young patient Checklists for left subclavian artery reconstruction in thoracic endovascular aortic repair
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1