THEORY OF KNOWLEDGE IN THE TRETISE OF AL-GAZALI “AL-KISTASU-LMUSTAKIM” (RIGHT SCALES)

D. Kodirov
{"title":"THEORY OF KNOWLEDGE IN THE TRETISE OF AL-GAZALI “AL-KISTASU-LMUSTAKIM” (RIGHT SCALES)","authors":"D. Kodirov","doi":"10.47980/iiau/2021/3/2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Today, one of the urgent tasks of the social\nsciences is the construction of the Third Renaissance in\nour country, the transfer of the heritage of our ancestors\nto the younger generation, and their education in the spirit\nof moral and spiritual ideas based on Islamic philosophy.\nTherefore, it is important to study and research the sources\nthat underlie the religious and philosophical views that have\nbeen formed and consolidated in our country for centuries.\nOne of these philosophical writings is Al-Qistasu-l-Mustakim\n(Right scales) by Abu Hamid Muhammad ibn Muhammad alGhazali, a thinker, lawyer, philosopher, and mystic who lived\nand worked during the early Renaissance, in the 11th century.\nAl-Qistasu-l-Mustakim by Abu Hamid al-Ghazali was\nwritten after his work Ihya ‘ulum ad-din and based on the\nphilosophical views of the philosopher his logical arguments\nagainst the teachings of the Ismailis. This article analyzes\nhis criteria for measuring views of Ismailis, what he means\nby Right Scales, and his religious and philosophical views.\nThe article analyzes how the value of things is determined\nby the primary necessary sciences, whether knowledge\narises from feelings, experience, or natural reasoning of the\nmind. The definition of mind (garyzatu-l-’akl) is the instinct\nof reason, which is embedded in a person as a quality or\nform of thinking. In particular, attention is paid to how the\nthinker compares experience with the instinct of reason, the\ncorrespondence of basic knowledge (al-’ulumu-l-awwaliyya)\nto the axioms of Aristotle, and the use of syllogisms of logic\nagainst the doctrine of Batynites.\nThe article reveals what al-Ghazali understands when\nhe talks about philosophical knowledge, on what basis we\ncan find out the truth, what methods of opinion and analogies\nare, and how to make decisions in controversial situations.\nAt the end of the article, there is a translation of the\nfirst chapter of Abu Hamid al-Ghazali’s book Al-Qistasu-lMustakim, devoted to the criteria of cognition.","PeriodicalId":180207,"journal":{"name":"The Light of Islam","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Light of Islam","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47980/iiau/2021/3/2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Today, one of the urgent tasks of the social sciences is the construction of the Third Renaissance in our country, the transfer of the heritage of our ancestors to the younger generation, and their education in the spirit of moral and spiritual ideas based on Islamic philosophy. Therefore, it is important to study and research the sources that underlie the religious and philosophical views that have been formed and consolidated in our country for centuries. One of these philosophical writings is Al-Qistasu-l-Mustakim (Right scales) by Abu Hamid Muhammad ibn Muhammad alGhazali, a thinker, lawyer, philosopher, and mystic who lived and worked during the early Renaissance, in the 11th century. Al-Qistasu-l-Mustakim by Abu Hamid al-Ghazali was written after his work Ihya ‘ulum ad-din and based on the philosophical views of the philosopher his logical arguments against the teachings of the Ismailis. This article analyzes his criteria for measuring views of Ismailis, what he means by Right Scales, and his religious and philosophical views. The article analyzes how the value of things is determined by the primary necessary sciences, whether knowledge arises from feelings, experience, or natural reasoning of the mind. The definition of mind (garyzatu-l-’akl) is the instinct of reason, which is embedded in a person as a quality or form of thinking. In particular, attention is paid to how the thinker compares experience with the instinct of reason, the correspondence of basic knowledge (al-’ulumu-l-awwaliyya) to the axioms of Aristotle, and the use of syllogisms of logic against the doctrine of Batynites. The article reveals what al-Ghazali understands when he talks about philosophical knowledge, on what basis we can find out the truth, what methods of opinion and analogies are, and how to make decisions in controversial situations. At the end of the article, there is a translation of the first chapter of Abu Hamid al-Ghazali’s book Al-Qistasu-lMustakim, devoted to the criteria of cognition.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
gazali《al-kistasu-lmustakim》论著中的认识论(右音阶)
今天,社会科学的紧迫任务之一是在我国建设第三次文艺复兴,将我们祖先的遗产传递给年轻一代,并以伊斯兰哲学为基础对他们进行道德和精神观念的教育。因此,研究几个世纪以来在我国形成和巩固的宗教和哲学观点的来源是很重要的。这些哲学著作之一是阿布·哈米德·穆罕默德·伊本·穆罕默德·阿尔哈扎利的《Al-Qistasu-l-Mustakim》(右刻度),他是一位思想家、律师、哲学家和神秘主义者,生活和工作于11世纪早期的文艺复兴时期。Abu Hamid al-Ghazali的Al-Qistasu-l-Mustakim是在他的作品Ihya ' ulum ad-din之后写的,基于哲学家的哲学观点,他的逻辑论点反对伊斯玛仪派的教义。本文分析了他衡量伊斯玛仪派观点的标准,他所说的正确尺度,以及他的宗教和哲学观。文章分析了事物的价值是如何由基本的必要科学决定的,无论知识是来自感觉、经验还是心灵的自然推理。心灵的定义(garyzatu-l- akl)是一种理性的本能,它作为一种思考的质量形式嵌入在一个人身上。特别要注意的是,思想家如何比较经验与理性本能,基本知识(al- ' ulumu-l- awaliyya)与亚里士多德公理的对应关系,以及使用逻辑三段论来反对Batynites的学说。本文揭示了al-Ghazali在谈论哲学知识时所理解的内容,我们可以在什么基础上发现真理,什么是意见和类比的方法,以及如何在有争议的情况下做出决定。在文章的最后,有Abu Hamid al-Ghazali的书Al-Qistasu-lMustakim的第一章的翻译,专门讨论认知的标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
CONTRIBUTION OF STRUCTURAL DIVISIONS AND MOSQUES TO THE SOCIAL LIFE OF THE REPUBLIC OF TATARSTAN TURKIC DYNASTIES IN EGYPT MODERN METHODS OF MISSIONARIES ON LEXICAL WAY OF POLITNIESS CATEGORY IN THE TURKISH LANGUAGE THE CONTRIBUTION OF THE PEOPLES OF MAWARANNAHR TO THE ISLAMIC SCIENCES AND CULTURE
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1