Bacterial Contamination of Neonatal Intensive Care Unit

Abir Ben Ashur
{"title":"Bacterial Contamination of Neonatal Intensive Care Unit","authors":"Abir Ben Ashur","doi":"10.47705/kjdmr.2262009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background and objectives. The environmental impact assessment plays an important role in ensuring environmental media. This study aimed to assess the environmental pollution of the neonatal intensive care unit in Al-Jala hospital of obstetrics and gynecology, Tripoli, Libya through environmental monitoring of bacteria on different surfaces. Methods. A cross-sectional, descriptive study was carried out in the neonatal intensive care unit from December- to February 2022 at Al-Jala hospital, Tripoli. A total of 61 samples were collected with a sterile swab from high-contact environmental surfaces. Isolation, identification, and antibiotic resistance of bacterial isolated were performed by standard technique. Blood culture isolates from neonatal intensive care unit patients were compared with the environmental isolates during the study period. Results. Out of 61 samples, bacterial growth was observed in 58 samples, out of which 40 (68.9%) were gram-positive and 18 (31.03%) were gram-negative. The observed gram-positive bacterial isolate was Staphylococcus aureus 13(32.5%), and most of gram-positive isolates were recovered from an incubator, suction tip, stethoscope, ambu bag, and staff hand. The potential gram-negative bacterial isolates were E. coli 10 (55.5%), and the majority of gram-negative isolates were recovered from the door handle, suction tip, neonate breathing tube, and staff hand. The isolated bacteria were resistant to amoxicillin (41.3%), clindamycin (39.6%), imipenem, and tetracycline (27.5%). Common potential pathogens isolated from the blood culture of NICU patients were staphylococcus aureus. Conclusion. Bacterial contamination of objects and instruments in neonatal intensive care units was high (95%). This study emphasizes the need for rigorous decontamination protocols and hand hygiene. Clindamycin and tetracycline may be used for empirical therapy in clinically suspected cases of isolates.","PeriodicalId":436335,"journal":{"name":"Khalij-Libya Journal of Dental and Medical Research","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Khalij-Libya Journal of Dental and Medical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47705/kjdmr.2262009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objectives. The environmental impact assessment plays an important role in ensuring environmental media. This study aimed to assess the environmental pollution of the neonatal intensive care unit in Al-Jala hospital of obstetrics and gynecology, Tripoli, Libya through environmental monitoring of bacteria on different surfaces. Methods. A cross-sectional, descriptive study was carried out in the neonatal intensive care unit from December- to February 2022 at Al-Jala hospital, Tripoli. A total of 61 samples were collected with a sterile swab from high-contact environmental surfaces. Isolation, identification, and antibiotic resistance of bacterial isolated were performed by standard technique. Blood culture isolates from neonatal intensive care unit patients were compared with the environmental isolates during the study period. Results. Out of 61 samples, bacterial growth was observed in 58 samples, out of which 40 (68.9%) were gram-positive and 18 (31.03%) were gram-negative. The observed gram-positive bacterial isolate was Staphylococcus aureus 13(32.5%), and most of gram-positive isolates were recovered from an incubator, suction tip, stethoscope, ambu bag, and staff hand. The potential gram-negative bacterial isolates were E. coli 10 (55.5%), and the majority of gram-negative isolates were recovered from the door handle, suction tip, neonate breathing tube, and staff hand. The isolated bacteria were resistant to amoxicillin (41.3%), clindamycin (39.6%), imipenem, and tetracycline (27.5%). Common potential pathogens isolated from the blood culture of NICU patients were staphylococcus aureus. Conclusion. Bacterial contamination of objects and instruments in neonatal intensive care units was high (95%). This study emphasizes the need for rigorous decontamination protocols and hand hygiene. Clindamycin and tetracycline may be used for empirical therapy in clinically suspected cases of isolates.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
新生儿重症监护病房的细菌污染
背景和目标。环境影响评价在保障环境介质方面起着重要作用。本研究旨在通过对利比亚的黎波里Al-Jala妇产医院新生儿重症监护病房不同表面细菌的环境监测,评估新生儿重症监护病房的环境污染情况。方法。从2022年12月至2月,在的黎波里Al-Jala医院的新生儿重症监护室进行了一项横断面描述性研究。用无菌拭子从高接触环境表面采集了61份样本。采用标准技术对分离的细菌进行分离、鉴定和耐药性测定。将新生儿重症监护病房患者血培养分离株与环境分离株进行比较。结果。61份样品中,58份样品检出细菌生长,其中革兰氏阳性40份(68.9%),革兰氏阴性18份(31.03%)。革兰氏阳性分离菌为金黄色葡萄球菌13(32.5%),革兰氏阳性分离菌大部分来自培养箱、吸头、听诊器、急救袋和工作人员的手。潜在革兰氏阴性菌为大肠杆菌10(55.5%),革兰氏阴性菌主要来自门把手、吸头、新生儿呼吸管和工作人员的手。对阿莫西林(41.3%)、克林霉素(39.6%)、亚胺培南和四环素(27.5%)耐药。从新生儿重症监护病房患者血培养中分离到的常见潜在病原菌为金黄色葡萄球菌。结论。新生儿重症监护病房中物品和器械的细菌污染较高(95%)。这项研究强调需要严格的去污方案和手卫生。克林霉素和四环素可用于临床疑似分离病例的经验性治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Surgical management of Mandibular Central Giant Cell Granuloma: A case report Challenges Faced by Libyan Dental Practitioners in Endodontic Treatment Evaluating the Correlation of Fasting Blood Sugar, Glycated Hemoglobin with the Hearing Loss Evaluation of Convergence Angles in Posterior Crown Preparations by Dental Students at Zawia University Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practice of Biomimetic Dentistry among General Dentists and Specialists in Tripoli, Libya
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1