Evaluation of Convergence Angles in Posterior Crown Preparations by Dental Students at Zawia University

Fatma Esmeda
{"title":"Evaluation of Convergence Angles in Posterior Crown Preparations by Dental Students at Zawia University","authors":"Fatma Esmeda","doi":"10.47705/248202","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background and objectives: Achieving optimal axial taper and occlusal convergence in crown preparations is a crucial concern among dental students. Proper preparation design is essential for the long-term success of full-coverage restorations. This study aimed to evaluate the convergence angles and axial taper achieved by dental students in their crown preparations. Methods. A total of 80 posterior tooth preparations (40 mandibular first molars and 40 mandibular second molars) created by second-year dental students on a dental simulator were analyzed. The total occlusal convergence (TOC), bucco-lingual (BL) and mesio-distal (MD) convergence angles, as well as the degree of taper on the axial walls, were measured using the B&B dental software (Guide system, B&B, Italy). Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS version 27. Results. The overall mean of the total convergence angle was 21.88°, with a BL convergence angle mean value of 23.11° (standard deviation of 13.3°) and an MD convergence angle mean value of 20.66° (standard deviation of 11.0°). The results showed a statistically significant difference between the mesial axial taper and the distal axial taper (p-value < 0.001). However, no significant differences were observed between the buccal axial taper and lingual axial taper (p-value > 0.05), or between the BL convergence angle and MD convergence angle (p-value > 0.05). Conclusion. The study revealed variations in the convergence angles of full metal crown preparations created by dental students. The recommended convergence angle was difficult for these students to achieve.","PeriodicalId":436335,"journal":{"name":"Khalij-Libya Journal of Dental and Medical Research","volume":"11 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Khalij-Libya Journal of Dental and Medical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47705/248202","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objectives: Achieving optimal axial taper and occlusal convergence in crown preparations is a crucial concern among dental students. Proper preparation design is essential for the long-term success of full-coverage restorations. This study aimed to evaluate the convergence angles and axial taper achieved by dental students in their crown preparations. Methods. A total of 80 posterior tooth preparations (40 mandibular first molars and 40 mandibular second molars) created by second-year dental students on a dental simulator were analyzed. The total occlusal convergence (TOC), bucco-lingual (BL) and mesio-distal (MD) convergence angles, as well as the degree of taper on the axial walls, were measured using the B&B dental software (Guide system, B&B, Italy). Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS version 27. Results. The overall mean of the total convergence angle was 21.88°, with a BL convergence angle mean value of 23.11° (standard deviation of 13.3°) and an MD convergence angle mean value of 20.66° (standard deviation of 11.0°). The results showed a statistically significant difference between the mesial axial taper and the distal axial taper (p-value < 0.001). However, no significant differences were observed between the buccal axial taper and lingual axial taper (p-value > 0.05), or between the BL convergence angle and MD convergence angle (p-value > 0.05). Conclusion. The study revealed variations in the convergence angles of full metal crown preparations created by dental students. The recommended convergence angle was difficult for these students to achieve.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
扎维亚大学牙科学生对后牙冠制备中聚合角度的评估
背景和目的:在牙冠预备中获得最佳的轴向锥度和咬合会聚是牙科学生关注的一个重要问题。正确的预备设计对于全覆盖修复体的长期成功至关重要。本研究旨在评估牙科学生在牙冠预备过程中达到的会聚角和轴向锥度。研究方法分析了牙科二年级学生在牙科模拟器上制作的 80 个后牙预备(40 个下颌第一磨牙和 40 个下颌第二磨牙)。使用 B&B 牙科软件(Guide system,B&B,意大利)测量了总咬合拢角(TOC)、颊舌拢角(BL)和中远拢角(MD)以及轴壁的锥度。使用 SPSS 27 版本进行统计分析。结果总辐辏角的总平均值为 21.88°,BL辐辏角的平均值为 23.11°(标准差为 13.3°),MD辐辏角的平均值为 20.66°(标准差为 11.0°)。结果显示,中轴锥度和远轴锥度之间存在显著的统计学差异(P 值 < 0.001)。但是,颊侧轴向锥度和舌侧轴向锥度之间(P 值 > 0.05),以及 BL 聚合角和 MD 聚合角之间(P 值 > 0.05)均无明显差异。结论该研究揭示了牙科学生制作的全金属冠预备体的聚合角度存在差异。这些学生很难达到推荐的聚合角度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Surgical management of Mandibular Central Giant Cell Granuloma: A case report Challenges Faced by Libyan Dental Practitioners in Endodontic Treatment Evaluating the Correlation of Fasting Blood Sugar, Glycated Hemoglobin with the Hearing Loss Evaluation of Convergence Angles in Posterior Crown Preparations by Dental Students at Zawia University Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practice of Biomimetic Dentistry among General Dentists and Specialists in Tripoli, Libya
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1