Truth and meaning in the maze of irony: A glance at Muriel Spark’s fiction

A. Walczuk
{"title":"Truth and meaning in the maze of irony: A glance at Muriel Spark’s fiction","authors":"A. Walczuk","doi":"10.26881/BP.2018.4.06","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article addresses the issue of truth and its treatment in the fiction of Muriel Spark (1918–2006), who with her first novel, The Com-forters, made her name as a distinctly post-modern novelist. The publication of The Comforters coincided with her conversion to Roman Catholicism, and Spark was explicit about the vital influence which her newly-embraced religion had upon her becoming a writer of fiction. The major point in the following argument is Spark’s overt declaration that her writing of novels, which she defines in terms of lies, represents her quest for absolute truth. This apparently para-doxical admission is reflected in Spark’s creative output, which combines most unlikely features: postmodernist leanings, commitment to religious belief and a deep-seated conviction on the part of the author about the irrefutable validity of absolute truth. The article focuses mainly on two of Spark’s novels: The Only Problem and Symposium, which demonstrate the postmodernist perspective with its in-sistence on the relativity of truth or its outright negation in the form of the concept of “post-truth”. The presented analysis shows how Spark’s narratives pursue truth across the multiplicity of continually undermined meanings jointly generated by the text and the reader as its recipient. The discussion emphasises the irony which Muriel Spark proposes as the most effective strategy for getting an inkling of absolute truth, which remains for Spark a solid though evasive value, hidden under the multiplicity of meanings.","PeriodicalId":345953,"journal":{"name":"Beyond Philology An International Journal of Linguistics, Literary Studies and English Language Teaching","volume":"46 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Beyond Philology An International Journal of Linguistics, Literary Studies and English Language Teaching","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26881/BP.2018.4.06","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article addresses the issue of truth and its treatment in the fiction of Muriel Spark (1918–2006), who with her first novel, The Com-forters, made her name as a distinctly post-modern novelist. The publication of The Comforters coincided with her conversion to Roman Catholicism, and Spark was explicit about the vital influence which her newly-embraced religion had upon her becoming a writer of fiction. The major point in the following argument is Spark’s overt declaration that her writing of novels, which she defines in terms of lies, represents her quest for absolute truth. This apparently para-doxical admission is reflected in Spark’s creative output, which combines most unlikely features: postmodernist leanings, commitment to religious belief and a deep-seated conviction on the part of the author about the irrefutable validity of absolute truth. The article focuses mainly on two of Spark’s novels: The Only Problem and Symposium, which demonstrate the postmodernist perspective with its in-sistence on the relativity of truth or its outright negation in the form of the concept of “post-truth”. The presented analysis shows how Spark’s narratives pursue truth across the multiplicity of continually undermined meanings jointly generated by the text and the reader as its recipient. The discussion emphasises the irony which Muriel Spark proposes as the most effective strategy for getting an inkling of absolute truth, which remains for Spark a solid though evasive value, hidden under the multiplicity of meanings.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
讽刺迷宫中的真理与意义:穆丽尔·斯帕克小说概览
这篇文章探讨了穆里尔·斯帕克(1918-2006)小说中的真相问题及其处理方式,她的第一部小说《comforters》使她成为一位独特的后现代小说家。《安慰者》的出版恰逢她皈依罗马天主教,斯帕克明确表示,她刚刚接受的宗教对她成为一名小说作家产生了至关重要的影响。以下论点的重点是斯帕克公开宣称她的小说写作,她用谎言来定义,代表了她对绝对真理的追求。这种明显的自相矛盾的承认反映在Spark的创作输出中,它结合了最不可能的特征:后现代主义倾向,对宗教信仰的承诺,以及作者对绝对真理无可辩驳的有效性的根深蒂固的信念。本文主要考察斯巴克的两部小说《唯一的问题》和《会饮篇》,这两部小说要么坚持真理的相对性,要么以“后真理”概念的形式对真理进行彻底的否定,体现了后现代主义的观点。本文的分析表明,斯帕克的叙事是如何在文本和作为接受者的读者共同产生的不断破坏的多重意义中追求真理的。讨论强调了Muriel Spark提出的反讽作为获得绝对真理线索的最有效策略,这对Spark来说仍然是一个坚实的,但回避的价值,隐藏在多重意义之下。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Taboo zoonyms: What do 'bear', 'lynx' and 'wolf' have in common? Taboo zoonyms: What do 'bear', 'lynx' and 'wolf' have in common? Circumlocutions with the noun guy in Hawai’i Creole English Fostering an autonomous approach as a key to successful remote learning during the covid pandemic Cross-linguistic phonological interaction: Word-stress usage in the English of Polish advanced EFL speakers
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1