Integrated Sand Control Method Design Based on Dsa, Lpsa and Geologic Aspects

G. Peña, Humberto Chaparro, I. Rodriguez, E. Azuaje
{"title":"Integrated Sand Control Method Design Based on Dsa, Lpsa and Geologic Aspects","authors":"G. Peña, Humberto Chaparro, I. Rodriguez, E. Azuaje","doi":"10.2118/191227-MS","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Design a completion system for sand control based on top technology as an alternative to the slotted-liner completions systems currently installed in extra heavy oil producing wells in unconsolidated formations.\n The methodology and design are based on the resulting interpretations of Dry Sieve Analysis (DSA), Laser Particle Sieve Analysis (LPSA), and geological considerations. Based on the results of these analyses, uniformity coefficients were calculated and grain size sorting results were used to validate the completion criteria, the system type, and the open area to be used. Once these criterions were selected, the Sand Retention Test (SRT) was utilized in the laboratory to verify the performance of the design using different liner sections and core plugs specific to the area; which allowed the selection of the appropriate system. Quantifying the total recovered barrels with the new completion system was done using a nodal analysis in order to evaluate the cost benefit in a typical well.\n As result of the interpretations of the tests, it was determined that the open area size of the completion system should be 200 μm, being estimated by the D10 obtained by the DSA realized to the core \"A\" of the Lower Morichal Formation. With the LPSA realized to the core \"B\", the quantity of thin grain movables less than 45 μm was estimated for the Lower Morichal Formation. All of these criteria were unified to select the completion method best suited for sand control. The results shows that the best option is metal mesh screen, which offer 150% more flow area in comparison with the slotted liner which translates to a recovery of 10% in production according to nodal analysis simulations.\n While current design practices sometimes take into consideration grain size distribution and sorting, this paper highlights the added benefit of combining this approach with the laboratory results of the DSA and LPSA testing methods to ensure that production recovery is truly maximized.","PeriodicalId":415543,"journal":{"name":"Day 2 Tue, June 26, 2018","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 2 Tue, June 26, 2018","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/191227-MS","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Design a completion system for sand control based on top technology as an alternative to the slotted-liner completions systems currently installed in extra heavy oil producing wells in unconsolidated formations. The methodology and design are based on the resulting interpretations of Dry Sieve Analysis (DSA), Laser Particle Sieve Analysis (LPSA), and geological considerations. Based on the results of these analyses, uniformity coefficients were calculated and grain size sorting results were used to validate the completion criteria, the system type, and the open area to be used. Once these criterions were selected, the Sand Retention Test (SRT) was utilized in the laboratory to verify the performance of the design using different liner sections and core plugs specific to the area; which allowed the selection of the appropriate system. Quantifying the total recovered barrels with the new completion system was done using a nodal analysis in order to evaluate the cost benefit in a typical well. As result of the interpretations of the tests, it was determined that the open area size of the completion system should be 200 μm, being estimated by the D10 obtained by the DSA realized to the core "A" of the Lower Morichal Formation. With the LPSA realized to the core "B", the quantity of thin grain movables less than 45 μm was estimated for the Lower Morichal Formation. All of these criteria were unified to select the completion method best suited for sand control. The results shows that the best option is metal mesh screen, which offer 150% more flow area in comparison with the slotted liner which translates to a recovery of 10% in production according to nodal analysis simulations. While current design practices sometimes take into consideration grain size distribution and sorting, this paper highlights the added benefit of combining this approach with the laboratory results of the DSA and LPSA testing methods to ensure that production recovery is truly maximized.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于Dsa、Lpsa和地质的综合防砂方法设计
设计一种基于顶部技术的防砂完井系统,作为目前在松散地层中超稠油井中安装的缝管完井系统的替代方案。方法和设计是基于干燥筛分析(DSA),激光颗粒筛分析(LPSA)和地质考虑的结果解释。在此基础上,计算均匀度系数,并利用粒度分选结果验证完井标准、系统类型和开放面积。一旦选择了这些标准,就会在实验室中使用不同的尾管段和特定区域的岩心桥塞进行留砂测试(SRT),以验证设计的性能;这样就可以选择合适的系统。为了评估典型井的成本效益,使用节点分析对新完井系统的总采收率进行了量化。根据对下Morichal组“A”岩心的DSA计算得到的D10,通过对测试结果的解释,确定完井系统的开放面积应为200 μm。通过对岩心“B”的LPSA实现,估计了下莫里组小于45 μm的细粒可动物的数量。所有这些标准都是统一的,以选择最适合防砂的完井方法。结果表明,最佳选择是金属网筛管,与开槽尾管相比,金属网筛管的通流面积增加了150%,根据节点分析模拟,金属网筛管的采收率提高了10%。虽然目前的设计实践有时会考虑粒度分布和分选,但本文强调了将这种方法与DSA和LPSA测试方法的实验室结果相结合的额外好处,以确保真正最大化生产回收率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Optimization under Uncertainty for Reliable Unconventional Play Evaluation. A Case Study in Vaca Muerta Shale Gas Blocks, Argentina Stability Improvement of CO2 Foam for Enhanced Oil Recovery Applications Using Nanoparticles and Viscoelastic Surfactants Effect of Temperature, Phase Change, and Chemical Additive on Wettability Alteration During Steam Applications in Sands and Carbonates Application of the Capacitance Model in Primary Production Period before IOR Implementation Transient and Boundary Dominated Flow Temperature Analysis under Variable Rate Conditions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1