AI on the Edge: Architectural Alternatives

Meenu Mary John, H. H. Olsson, J. Bosch
{"title":"AI on the Edge: Architectural Alternatives","authors":"Meenu Mary John, H. H. Olsson, J. Bosch","doi":"10.1109/SEAA51224.2020.00015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Since the advent of mobile computing and IoT, a large amount of data is distributed around the world. Companies are increasingly experimenting with innovative ways of implementing edge/cloud (re)training of AI systems to exploit large quantities of data to optimize their business value. Despite the obvious benefits, companies face challenges as the decision on how to implement edge/cloud (re)training depends on factors such as the task intent, the amount of data needed for (re)training, edge-to-cloud data transfer, the available computing and memory resources. Based on action research in a software-intensive embedded systems company where we study multiple use cases as well as insights from our previous collaborations with industry, we develop a generic framework consisting of five architectural alternatives to deploy AI on the edge utilizing transfer learning. We validate the framework in four additional case companies and present the challenges they face in selecting the optimal architecture. The contribution of the paper is threefold. First, we develop a generic framework consisting of five architectural alternatives ranging from a centralized architecture where cloud (re)training is given priority to a decentralized architecture where edge (re)training is instead given priority. Second, we validate the framework in a qualitative interview study with four additional case companies. As an outcome of validation study, we present two variants to the architectural alternatives identified as part of the framework. Finally, we identify the key challenges that experts face in selecting an ideal architectural alternative.","PeriodicalId":287157,"journal":{"name":"2020 46th Euromicro Conference on Software Engineering and Advanced Applications (SEAA)","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2020 46th Euromicro Conference on Software Engineering and Advanced Applications (SEAA)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SEAA51224.2020.00015","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Since the advent of mobile computing and IoT, a large amount of data is distributed around the world. Companies are increasingly experimenting with innovative ways of implementing edge/cloud (re)training of AI systems to exploit large quantities of data to optimize their business value. Despite the obvious benefits, companies face challenges as the decision on how to implement edge/cloud (re)training depends on factors such as the task intent, the amount of data needed for (re)training, edge-to-cloud data transfer, the available computing and memory resources. Based on action research in a software-intensive embedded systems company where we study multiple use cases as well as insights from our previous collaborations with industry, we develop a generic framework consisting of five architectural alternatives to deploy AI on the edge utilizing transfer learning. We validate the framework in four additional case companies and present the challenges they face in selecting the optimal architecture. The contribution of the paper is threefold. First, we develop a generic framework consisting of five architectural alternatives ranging from a centralized architecture where cloud (re)training is given priority to a decentralized architecture where edge (re)training is instead given priority. Second, we validate the framework in a qualitative interview study with four additional case companies. As an outcome of validation study, we present two variants to the architectural alternatives identified as part of the framework. Finally, we identify the key challenges that experts face in selecting an ideal architectural alternative.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
边缘的AI:架构选择
自从移动计算和物联网出现以来,大量的数据分布在世界各地。越来越多的公司正在尝试采用创新的方式来实施边缘/云(再)训练人工智能系统,以利用大量数据来优化其业务价值。尽管有明显的好处,但公司面临着挑战,因为如何实施边缘/云(再)培训的决策取决于任务意图、(再)培训所需的数据量、边缘到云数据传输、可用的计算和内存资源等因素。基于在一家软件密集型嵌入式系统公司的行动研究,我们研究了多个用例以及我们以前与行业合作的见解,我们开发了一个通用框架,由五个架构替代方案组成,利用迁移学习在边缘部署人工智能。我们在另外四个案例公司中验证了该框架,并展示了他们在选择最佳架构时面临的挑战。这篇论文有三方面的贡献。首先,我们开发了一个通用框架,由五种架构替代方案组成,从集中式架构(云(再)训练优先考虑)到分散式架构(边缘(再)训练优先考虑)。其次,我们在另外四个案例公司的定性访谈研究中验证了该框架。作为验证研究的结果,我们提出了作为框架一部分的体系结构备选方案的两种变体。最后,我们确定了专家在选择理想的体系结构替代方案时面临的关键挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Deriving Microservice Code from Underspecified Domain Models Using DevOps-Enabled Modeling Languages and Model Transformations The Effects of Database Complexity on SQL Query Formulation (journal-first) Common Causes and Effects of Technical Debt in Serbian IT: InsighTD Survey Replication Improving Data Quality for Regression Test Selection by Reducing Annotation Noise Architectures of Cloud-enabled Cyber Physical Systems — a Systematic Mapping Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1