Documentary and its doubles

D. MacDougall
{"title":"Documentary and its doubles","authors":"D. MacDougall","doi":"10.7228/manchester/9781526134097.003.0013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter provides a critical overview of the history of documentary cinema, arguing that it gradually lost sight of its early inspiration in the cinema of the Lumière brothers, adopting many of the features of fiction film production and modelling itself increasingly on didactic texts and journalism. In the sound era, British documentary films made under the aegis of John Grierson, despite his celebration of the ‘actual’, turned towards mass education and an idealised vision of collective humanity, and away from recording actual events in human lives. Italian Neorealist fiction films and changes to camera technology in the post-war period inspired a return to these objectives, but this found little space in television, which remained firmly fixed on journalism, entertainment, and public issues. Reactions took many forms, including experimental documentaries, social advocacy, biography and autobiography, and films exploring the relationship of film to reality, as in the work of Jean Rouch and Errol Morris. The rise of observational films gave promise of a return to the more modest aim of giving audiences shared access to what the filmmaker had witnessed, despite the challenges of manipulative ‘reality’ television and designer-packaged documentaries. The essay refers to a host of influences and commentaries, including those of Edward Said, Bill Nichols, Dai Vaughan, Robert Flaherty, Jean Rouch, Colin Young, and Grierson himself.","PeriodicalId":127424,"journal":{"name":"The looking machine","volume":"91 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The looking machine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7228/manchester/9781526134097.003.0013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This chapter provides a critical overview of the history of documentary cinema, arguing that it gradually lost sight of its early inspiration in the cinema of the Lumière brothers, adopting many of the features of fiction film production and modelling itself increasingly on didactic texts and journalism. In the sound era, British documentary films made under the aegis of John Grierson, despite his celebration of the ‘actual’, turned towards mass education and an idealised vision of collective humanity, and away from recording actual events in human lives. Italian Neorealist fiction films and changes to camera technology in the post-war period inspired a return to these objectives, but this found little space in television, which remained firmly fixed on journalism, entertainment, and public issues. Reactions took many forms, including experimental documentaries, social advocacy, biography and autobiography, and films exploring the relationship of film to reality, as in the work of Jean Rouch and Errol Morris. The rise of observational films gave promise of a return to the more modest aim of giving audiences shared access to what the filmmaker had witnessed, despite the challenges of manipulative ‘reality’ television and designer-packaged documentaries. The essay refers to a host of influences and commentaries, including those of Edward Said, Bill Nichols, Dai Vaughan, Robert Flaherty, Jean Rouch, Colin Young, and Grierson himself.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
纪录片及其翻版
本章对纪录片电影的历史进行了批判性的概述,认为它逐渐失去了lumi兄弟电影的早期灵感,采用了小说电影制作的许多特征,并越来越多地以说教文本和新闻为基础。在有声时代,在约翰·格里尔森的支持下制作的英国纪录片,尽管他歌颂“真实”,但转向大众教育和集体人性的理想化愿景,远离记录人类生活中的真实事件。意大利新现实主义小说电影和战后摄像技术的变化激发了对这些目标的回归,但这在电视中发现的空间很少,电视仍然牢牢地固定在新闻、娱乐和公共问题上。反应有多种形式,包括实验纪录片、社会宣传、传记和自传,以及探索电影与现实关系的电影,如让·鲁什和埃罗尔·莫里斯的作品。观察性电影的兴起给观众带来了回归更谦逊的目标的希望,即让观众分享电影制作人所见证的东西,尽管有操纵的“现实”电视和设计师包装的纪录片的挑战。这篇文章引用了大量的影响和评论,包括爱德华·赛义德、比尔·尼科尔斯、戴·沃恩、罗伯特·弗莱厄蒂、让·鲁什、科林·杨和格里尔森本人的影响和评论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Sensational cinema Notes on cinematic space Camera, mind and eye Observation in the cinema Documentary and its doubles
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1