Retrospective and perspective analysis of the development of understanding and ensuring the rights of indigenous peoples of Ukraine

A. Opanasenko
{"title":"Retrospective and perspective analysis of the development of understanding and ensuring the rights of indigenous peoples of Ukraine","authors":"A. Opanasenko","doi":"10.33731/12022.258195","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Keywords: Indigenous peoples, indigenous peoples of Ukraine, Crimean Tatars, Karaites, Krymchaks, Gagauz people, Crimean Platform, Crimean Khanate, Crimean People's Republic, Autonomous Republic of Crimea, city of Sevastopol, Crimea, Sevastopol, Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People, Qurultay of the Crimean Tatar people, selfdetermination, occupation, deoccupation, genocide, deportation, deportation of the Crimean Tatars, Surgun \nThe article analyzes in detail the process of formation and development of the rights of indigenous peoples in independent Ukraine. Particular attention is paid to the provisions of the Constitution of Ukraine in this context and their interpretation. The legislative process and legislative initiatives that preceded the adoption of the Law of Ukraine “On the Legal Status of Indigenous Peoples of Ukraine” on July 21, 2021 are described.The peculiarities of the legal acts of Ukraine, which regulate the rights of indigenous peoples, their connection and further impact on the overall development of the studied issues, are clarified. A retrospective analysis of the legislation of the last 30 years, highlighting the main stages and elements, provides an opportunity to formulate a perspective on the further development of the indigenous peoples’ rights’ issue in Ukraine in the field of normative consolidation of their legal status and implementation of rights guaranteed by the Constitution and laws of Ukraine. The rights of indigenous peoples are depicted through the prism of modern legal and political processes, in particular, the Crimean Platform, as the most effective mechanism for de-occupation of the Autonomous Republic of Crimea and the city of Sevastopol, ensuring the rights of Ukrainian citizens violated by the temporary Russian occupation of the peninsula. Particular attention is paid to the place of the indigenous peoples of Crimea and the issue of restoringtheir rights under this mechanism. The restoration of such rights seems particularly important, given the particular persecution of indigenous peoples and their individual representatives by the occupying power today, as well as the perpetration of genocideagainst these peoples in the past.","PeriodicalId":356184,"journal":{"name":"Theory and Practice of Intellectual Property","volume":"68 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Theory and Practice of Intellectual Property","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33731/12022.258195","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Keywords: Indigenous peoples, indigenous peoples of Ukraine, Crimean Tatars, Karaites, Krymchaks, Gagauz people, Crimean Platform, Crimean Khanate, Crimean People's Republic, Autonomous Republic of Crimea, city of Sevastopol, Crimea, Sevastopol, Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People, Qurultay of the Crimean Tatar people, selfdetermination, occupation, deoccupation, genocide, deportation, deportation of the Crimean Tatars, Surgun The article analyzes in detail the process of formation and development of the rights of indigenous peoples in independent Ukraine. Particular attention is paid to the provisions of the Constitution of Ukraine in this context and their interpretation. The legislative process and legislative initiatives that preceded the adoption of the Law of Ukraine “On the Legal Status of Indigenous Peoples of Ukraine” on July 21, 2021 are described.The peculiarities of the legal acts of Ukraine, which regulate the rights of indigenous peoples, their connection and further impact on the overall development of the studied issues, are clarified. A retrospective analysis of the legislation of the last 30 years, highlighting the main stages and elements, provides an opportunity to formulate a perspective on the further development of the indigenous peoples’ rights’ issue in Ukraine in the field of normative consolidation of their legal status and implementation of rights guaranteed by the Constitution and laws of Ukraine. The rights of indigenous peoples are depicted through the prism of modern legal and political processes, in particular, the Crimean Platform, as the most effective mechanism for de-occupation of the Autonomous Republic of Crimea and the city of Sevastopol, ensuring the rights of Ukrainian citizens violated by the temporary Russian occupation of the peninsula. Particular attention is paid to the place of the indigenous peoples of Crimea and the issue of restoringtheir rights under this mechanism. The restoration of such rights seems particularly important, given the particular persecution of indigenous peoples and their individual representatives by the occupying power today, as well as the perpetration of genocideagainst these peoples in the past.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对了解和确保乌克兰土著人民权利的发展进行回顾和透视分析
关键词:土著人民、乌克兰土著人民、克里米亚鞑靼人、卡拉特人、克里姆察克人、加高兹人、克里米亚平台、克里米亚汗国、克里米亚人民共和国、克里米亚自治共和国、塞瓦斯托波尔市、克里米亚、塞瓦斯托波尔、克里米亚鞑靼人议会、克里米亚鞑靼人古尔塔伊、自决、占领、非占领、种族灭绝、驱逐、驱逐克里米亚鞑靼人、本文详细分析了乌克兰独立后原住民族权利的形成和发展过程。在这方面特别注意乌克兰宪法的规定及其解释。介绍了在2021年7月21日通过乌克兰“关于乌克兰土著人民法律地位”的法律之前的立法进程和立法倡议。澄清了规定土著人民权利的乌克兰法律行为的特点、它们之间的联系以及对所研究问题的全面发展的进一步影响。对过去30年立法的回顾性分析,突出了主要阶段和要素,提供了一个机会,可以对乌克兰土著人民权利问题在规范巩固其法律地位和执行乌克兰宪法和法律所保障的权利方面的进一步发展提出展望。土著人民的权利通过现代法律和政治进程,特别是《克里米亚纲要》,作为解除对克里米亚自治共和国和塞瓦斯托波尔市占领的最有效机制,得到了体现,确保了因俄罗斯暂时占领该半岛而受到侵犯的乌克兰公民的权利。委员会特别注意克里米亚土著人民的地位和在这一机制下恢复他们权利的问题。鉴于今天占领国对土著人民及其个别代表的特别迫害,以及过去对这些人民的种族灭绝,恢复这些权利似乎特别重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Accelerated examination of patent applications for «green» technologies: foreign experience for Ukraine Draft Regulation of the European Union about artificial intelligence and related initiatives Intellectual property rights in the context of biology, medicine and pharmacy: a look into the future The sui generis right to non-original objects generated by a computer program: novelties of legal regulation ABUSE OF PATENTABILITY CRITERIA WHEN PATENTING INVENTIONS RELATED TO MEDICINES
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1