Empirical Refinement of a Semiotic Information Quality Framework

Rosanne J. Price, G. Shanks
{"title":"Empirical Refinement of a Semiotic Information Quality Framework","authors":"Rosanne J. Price, G. Shanks","doi":"10.1109/HICSS.2005.233","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper presents the refinement of a semiotic information quality framework based on the analysis of practitioner and academic focus group feedback. The initial information quality framework was developed to address the question of what criteria should be used to define and assess quality. Semiotic theory, the philosophical theory of signs, provided a theoretical foundation for defining the framework structure (i.e. quality categories and their criteria) and for integrating objective, product-based and subjective, service-based quality perspectives, thus addressing problems observed in other proposed quality schemes with respect to scope and inconsistency. Following on from the initial theoretical work, empirical methods were used to refine the framework, especially the subjective components related to consumer quality perceptions. Specifically, focus group feedback served to (1) further clarify the scope and boundaries of the research and (2) to identify inter-dependencies, ambiguities, and gaps in the initial set of quality criteria.","PeriodicalId":355838,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 38th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences","volume":"41 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"41","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 38th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2005.233","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 41

Abstract

This paper presents the refinement of a semiotic information quality framework based on the analysis of practitioner and academic focus group feedback. The initial information quality framework was developed to address the question of what criteria should be used to define and assess quality. Semiotic theory, the philosophical theory of signs, provided a theoretical foundation for defining the framework structure (i.e. quality categories and their criteria) and for integrating objective, product-based and subjective, service-based quality perspectives, thus addressing problems observed in other proposed quality schemes with respect to scope and inconsistency. Following on from the initial theoretical work, empirical methods were used to refine the framework, especially the subjective components related to consumer quality perceptions. Specifically, focus group feedback served to (1) further clarify the scope and boundaries of the research and (2) to identify inter-dependencies, ambiguities, and gaps in the initial set of quality criteria.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
符号信息质量框架的经验改进
本文在分析实践者和学术界焦点小组反馈的基础上,提出了一个符号学信息质量框架的改进。最初的信息质量框架是为了解决应该使用什么标准来定义和评估质量的问题而制定的。符号学理论,即符号的哲学理论,为定义框架结构(即质量类别及其标准)和整合客观的、基于产品的和主观的、基于服务的质量观点提供了理论基础,从而解决了在其他提出的质量方案中观察到的范围和不一致性问题。在最初的理论工作之后,我们使用实证方法来完善框架,特别是与消费者质量感知相关的主观成分。具体来说,焦点小组反馈有助于(1)进一步澄清研究的范围和边界,(2)确定初始质量标准集中的相互依赖关系、歧义和差距。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Diversity: Is There More Than Meets The Eye? A Longitudinal Study of the Impact of Technology Support on Teams with Differing Diversity A Framework for Evaluating Strategic Location-Based Applications in Businesses A Comparison of Relational and Trust Training Techniques for Virtual Team Communication: How Much Training is Enough? Prototyping the Emergence of Collaborative Knowledge Towards an Approach for Managing the Development Portfolio in Small Product-Oriented Software Companies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1