Assessment of negative factors affecting the intestinal microbiota in people with excessive body mass compared to people with normal body mass

K. Osowiecka, N. Pokorna, D. Skrypnik
{"title":"Assessment of negative factors affecting the intestinal microbiota in people with excessive body mass compared to people with normal body mass","authors":"K. Osowiecka, N. Pokorna, D. Skrypnik","doi":"10.3390/iecn2020-07010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": Rationale: Intestinal microbiota plays a significant role in the human body. A range of negative factors may lead to dysbiosis, which results in many diseases (e.g., cancer) and metabolic disorders. It was shown that people with a body mass index (BMI) of ≥ 25 kg/m 2 present diminished microbial diversity. Additional negative factors such as stress, the use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID) and proton pomp inhibitors (PPI) may result in greater dysbiosis compared to people with normal body mass. The aim of the study was to compare the incidence of negative factors affecting the intestinal microbiota in people with excessive body mass vs. people with normal body mass. Methods: The study involved volunteers aged 18–65 years: 582 people with normal BMI (18.5–24.99 kg/m 2 ) and 538 people with BMI ≥ 25 kg/m 2 . The study was conducted using the author’s survey by the Computer-Assisted Web Interviewing method. The survey included the questions on sociodemographic features, level of physical activity, frequency of smoking, and stress. Frequency of NSAID and PPI use was also investigated. BMI was used to assess nutritional status. For statistics the Fisher test was implemented. p -Value < 0.05 was considered significant. Results: Women predominated in the study ( p < 0.0001). People with normal BMI had a significantly higher level of physical activity ( p < 0.0001) and smoked less ( p = 0.0356). People with excessive body mass were less likely to report illness ( p = 0.0004), but more often they took PPI ( p = 0.0337). Conclusions: People with BMI ≥ 25 kg/m 2 present more factors which may result in dysbiosis and lead to dysbiosis-related health problems in future compared to people with normal BMI.","PeriodicalId":320592,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of The 1st International Electronic Conference on Nutrients - Nutritional and Microbiota Effects on Chronic Disease","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of The 1st International Electronic Conference on Nutrients - Nutritional and Microbiota Effects on Chronic Disease","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/iecn2020-07010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

: Rationale: Intestinal microbiota plays a significant role in the human body. A range of negative factors may lead to dysbiosis, which results in many diseases (e.g., cancer) and metabolic disorders. It was shown that people with a body mass index (BMI) of ≥ 25 kg/m 2 present diminished microbial diversity. Additional negative factors such as stress, the use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID) and proton pomp inhibitors (PPI) may result in greater dysbiosis compared to people with normal body mass. The aim of the study was to compare the incidence of negative factors affecting the intestinal microbiota in people with excessive body mass vs. people with normal body mass. Methods: The study involved volunteers aged 18–65 years: 582 people with normal BMI (18.5–24.99 kg/m 2 ) and 538 people with BMI ≥ 25 kg/m 2 . The study was conducted using the author’s survey by the Computer-Assisted Web Interviewing method. The survey included the questions on sociodemographic features, level of physical activity, frequency of smoking, and stress. Frequency of NSAID and PPI use was also investigated. BMI was used to assess nutritional status. For statistics the Fisher test was implemented. p -Value < 0.05 was considered significant. Results: Women predominated in the study ( p < 0.0001). People with normal BMI had a significantly higher level of physical activity ( p < 0.0001) and smoked less ( p = 0.0356). People with excessive body mass were less likely to report illness ( p = 0.0004), but more often they took PPI ( p = 0.0337). Conclusions: People with BMI ≥ 25 kg/m 2 present more factors which may result in dysbiosis and lead to dysbiosis-related health problems in future compared to people with normal BMI.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
超重人群与正常人群肠道菌群的负面影响因素评估
理由:肠道菌群在人体中起着重要的作用。一系列负面因素可能导致生态失调,从而导致许多疾病(如癌症)和代谢紊乱。结果表明,体重指数(BMI)≥25 kg/ m2的人群微生物多样性减少。其他负面因素,如压力、非甾体抗炎药(NSAID)和质子泵抑制剂(PPI)的使用,与正常体重的人相比,可能导致更严重的生态失调。该研究的目的是比较体重超标人群与正常体重人群中影响肠道微生物群的负面因素的发生率。方法:研究对象为年龄在18-65岁之间的志愿者,其中582人BMI正常(18.5-24.99 kg/ m2), 538人BMI≥25 kg/ m2。本研究采用计算机辅助网络访谈法进行作者的调查。该调查包括社会人口特征、体育活动水平、吸烟频率和压力等问题。非甾体抗炎药和PPI的使用频率也进行了调查。BMI用于评估营养状况。统计学上采用Fisher检验。p -Value < 0.05为显著性。结果:女性在研究中占主导地位(p < 0.0001)。BMI正常的人身体活动水平明显较高(p < 0.0001),吸烟较少(p = 0.0356)。体重超标的人报告患病的可能性较小(p = 0.0004),但服用PPI的频率更高(p = 0.0337)。结论:与BMI正常者相比,BMI≥25 kg/ m2的人群存在更多可能导致生态失调的因素,并可能导致未来与生态失调相关的健康问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
EVALUATION AND DETERMINATIONS OF SECONDARY METABOLITES AND ITS ANTIOXIDANT ACTIVITIES OF VARIOUS FRACTIONS OF ALBIZIA MYRIOPHYLLA BARK Vitamin D supplementation is association with disease activity in systemic lupus erythematosus patients Cocoa and cocoa fibre intake modulate reactive oxygen species and immunoglobulin production in rats submitted to acute running exercise Dynamic Multi-Stage Gastrointestinal Digestion Model Assessment of Microbial Fermentation Products of Collagen Hydrolysates Elacteriospermum tapos ameliorates maternal obesity effect on serum leptin changes in male offspring
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1