Coracle: Evaluating Consensus at the Internet Edge

H. Howard, J. Crowcroft
{"title":"Coracle: Evaluating Consensus at the Internet Edge","authors":"H. Howard, J. Crowcroft","doi":"10.1145/2785956.2790010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Distributed consensus is fundamental in distributed systems for achieving fault-tolerance. The Paxos algorithm has long dominated this domain, although it has been recently challenged by algorithms such as Raft and Viewstamped Replication Revisited. These algorithms rely on Paxos's original assumptions, unfortunately these assumptions are now at odds with the reality of the modern internet. Our insight is that current consensus algorithms have significant availability issues when deployed outside the well defined context of the datacenter. To illustrate this problem, we developed Coracle, a tool for evaluating distributed consensus algorithms in settings that more accurately represent realistic deployments. We have used Coracle to test two examples of network configurations that contradict the liveness claims of the Raft algorithm. Through the process of exercising these algorithms under more realistic assumptions, we demonstrate wider availability issues faced by consensus algorithms when deployed on real world networks.","PeriodicalId":268472,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 2015 ACM Conference on Special Interest Group on Data Communication","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-08-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 2015 ACM Conference on Special Interest Group on Data Communication","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2785956.2790010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

Distributed consensus is fundamental in distributed systems for achieving fault-tolerance. The Paxos algorithm has long dominated this domain, although it has been recently challenged by algorithms such as Raft and Viewstamped Replication Revisited. These algorithms rely on Paxos's original assumptions, unfortunately these assumptions are now at odds with the reality of the modern internet. Our insight is that current consensus algorithms have significant availability issues when deployed outside the well defined context of the datacenter. To illustrate this problem, we developed Coracle, a tool for evaluating distributed consensus algorithms in settings that more accurately represent realistic deployments. We have used Coracle to test two examples of network configurations that contradict the liveness claims of the Raft algorithm. Through the process of exercising these algorithms under more realistic assumptions, we demonstrate wider availability issues faced by consensus algorithms when deployed on real world networks.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Coracle:互联网边缘的共识评估
分布式共识是分布式系统实现容错的基础。Paxos算法长期以来一直主导着这个领域,尽管它最近受到了Raft和Viewstamped Replication Revisited等算法的挑战。这些算法依赖于Paxos最初的假设,不幸的是,这些假设现在与现代互联网的现实不符。我们的见解是,当前的共识算法在部署在定义良好的数据中心上下文之外时存在严重的可用性问题。为了说明这个问题,我们开发了Coracle,这是一个在更准确地代表现实部署的设置中评估分布式共识算法的工具。我们使用Coracle测试了两个与Raft算法的活动性声明相矛盾的网络配置示例。通过在更现实的假设下行使这些算法的过程,我们展示了共识算法在部署到现实世界网络时面临的更广泛的可用性问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Alternative Trust Sources: Reducing DNSSEC Signature Verification Operations with TLS RPKI MIRO: Monitoring and Inspection of RPKI Objects Hopper: Decentralized Speculation-aware Cluster Scheduling at Scale Extreme Data-rate Scheduling for the Data Center Multi-Context TLS (mcTLS): Enabling Secure In-Network Functionality in TLS
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1