Unlocking the gender diversity–group performance link: the moderating role of relative cultural distance

G. Andrieu, Francesco Montani, I. Setti, V. Sommovigo
{"title":"Unlocking the gender diversity–group performance link: the moderating role of relative cultural distance","authors":"G. Andrieu, Francesco Montani, I. Setti, V. Sommovigo","doi":"10.1108/ccsm-09-2022-0153","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThis study aims to shed light on the relationship between gender diversity and group performance by considering the moderating role of relative cultural distance. Drawing from the categorization–elaboration model (CEM), the authors hypothesize that gender-diverse collaborative learning groups perform better when a low level of relative cultural distance in country-level individualism–collectivism or power distance exists among group members.Design/methodology/approachTo test this hypothesis, the authors conducted a study on 539 undergraduate students organized into 94 groups. The assessment of group performance was based on scores given by external raters.FindingsThe authors found that relative cultural distance significantly moderated the gender diversity–group performance relationship such that gender diversity was positively related to group performance when the collaborative learning group included members who similarly valued individualism–collectivism or power distance (i.e. relative cultural distance was low) and was negatively related to group performance when the collaborative learning group comprised members who differently valued individualism–collectivism or power distance (i.e. relative cultural distance was high).Originality/valueThis study contributes to understanding when gender diversity is positively associated with group performance by expanding the range of previously examined diversity dimensions to include relative cultural distance in country-level individualism–collectivism and power distance.","PeriodicalId":373772,"journal":{"name":"Cross Cultural & Strategic Management","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cross Cultural & Strategic Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ccsm-09-2022-0153","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PurposeThis study aims to shed light on the relationship between gender diversity and group performance by considering the moderating role of relative cultural distance. Drawing from the categorization–elaboration model (CEM), the authors hypothesize that gender-diverse collaborative learning groups perform better when a low level of relative cultural distance in country-level individualism–collectivism or power distance exists among group members.Design/methodology/approachTo test this hypothesis, the authors conducted a study on 539 undergraduate students organized into 94 groups. The assessment of group performance was based on scores given by external raters.FindingsThe authors found that relative cultural distance significantly moderated the gender diversity–group performance relationship such that gender diversity was positively related to group performance when the collaborative learning group included members who similarly valued individualism–collectivism or power distance (i.e. relative cultural distance was low) and was negatively related to group performance when the collaborative learning group comprised members who differently valued individualism–collectivism or power distance (i.e. relative cultural distance was high).Originality/valueThis study contributes to understanding when gender diversity is positively associated with group performance by expanding the range of previously examined diversity dimensions to include relative cultural distance in country-level individualism–collectivism and power distance.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
解锁性别多样性与群体绩效的联系:相对文化距离的调节作用
目的本研究旨在通过考虑相对文化距离的调节作用来揭示性别多样性与群体绩效之间的关系。根据分类-细化模型(CEM),作者假设当小组成员之间存在较低的国家层面的个人主义-集体主义或权力距离的相对文化距离时,性别多样化的协作学习小组表现更好。设计/方法/方法为了验证这一假设,作者对被分成94组的539名本科生进行了研究。小组表现的评估是基于外部评分者给出的分数。研究发现,相对文化距离显著调节了性别多样性与群体绩效的关系,当协作学习群体中包含具有相似个人主义-集体主义价值观或权力距离(即相对文化距离较低)的成员时,性别多样性与群体绩效呈正相关;当协作学习群体中包含具有不同价值观的成员时,性别多样性与群体绩效呈负相关个人主义-集体主义或权力距离(即相对文化距离高)。原创性/价值本研究通过扩大先前研究的多样性维度的范围,包括国家层面的个人主义-集体主义和权力距离的相对文化距离,有助于理解性别多样性何时与群体绩效呈正相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Artificial intelligence has become your co-worker! Exploring changes related to corporate culture and innovation capability Complementary perspectives on knowledge-and market-seeking outward FDI of EMNEs: a review and agenda for future research Does the presence of invitees in the audit committee impact firm value? Evidence from India Like minds think alike: impacts of cultural and trust congruences on joint innovation Technological diversification and innovation performance: the moderating effects of organizational slack and ownership in Chinese listed firms
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1