Technological diversification and innovation performance: the moderating effects of organizational slack and ownership in Chinese listed firms

Xingxin Zhao, Jiafu Su, Taewoo Roh, J. Lee, Xinrui Zhan
{"title":"Technological diversification and innovation performance: the moderating effects of organizational slack and ownership in Chinese listed firms","authors":"Xingxin Zhao, Jiafu Su, Taewoo Roh, J. Lee, Xinrui Zhan","doi":"10.1108/ccsm-01-2023-0011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThe purpose of this study is to examine the impact of technological diversification (TD) on enterprise innovation performance, meanwhile focusing on the moderating effects of various organizational slack (i.e. absorbed and unabsorbed slack) and ownership types (i.e. state-owned or privately-owned) in the context of Chinese listed firms.Design/methodology/approachThis study formulates five hypotheses based on organization and agency theories. Our empirical analysis employs a fixed-effect regression estimator with a unique panel dataset of Chinese-listed manufacturing firms and 13,566 firm-year observations over 9 years from 2012 to 2020.FindingsOur findings show that an inverted U-shaped relationship exists between TD and innovation performance, varying with different types of organizational slack and ownership. In state-owned enterprises (SOEs), unabsorbed slack negatively moderates the inverted U-shaped relationship; however, in privately-owned enterprises (POEs), this relationship is positively moderated. Although absorbed slack has negative moderating effects in both SOEs and POEs, its impact is only significant for POEs.Practical implicationsOur results imply that organizational slack has a contrasting impact on the relationship between TD and innovation performance when the type of ownership varies. Therefore, the managers that intend to achieve optimal innovation performance through TD should understand how organizational slack can be leveraged.Originality/valueThis study contributes to the existing literature by applying the relationship between TD and innovative performance to the transition economy, as well as examining the double-edged sword impact of state ownership on firm innovation performance.","PeriodicalId":373772,"journal":{"name":"Cross Cultural & Strategic Management","volume":"84 21","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cross Cultural & Strategic Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ccsm-01-2023-0011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PurposeThe purpose of this study is to examine the impact of technological diversification (TD) on enterprise innovation performance, meanwhile focusing on the moderating effects of various organizational slack (i.e. absorbed and unabsorbed slack) and ownership types (i.e. state-owned or privately-owned) in the context of Chinese listed firms.Design/methodology/approachThis study formulates five hypotheses based on organization and agency theories. Our empirical analysis employs a fixed-effect regression estimator with a unique panel dataset of Chinese-listed manufacturing firms and 13,566 firm-year observations over 9 years from 2012 to 2020.FindingsOur findings show that an inverted U-shaped relationship exists between TD and innovation performance, varying with different types of organizational slack and ownership. In state-owned enterprises (SOEs), unabsorbed slack negatively moderates the inverted U-shaped relationship; however, in privately-owned enterprises (POEs), this relationship is positively moderated. Although absorbed slack has negative moderating effects in both SOEs and POEs, its impact is only significant for POEs.Practical implicationsOur results imply that organizational slack has a contrasting impact on the relationship between TD and innovation performance when the type of ownership varies. Therefore, the managers that intend to achieve optimal innovation performance through TD should understand how organizational slack can be leveraged.Originality/valueThis study contributes to the existing literature by applying the relationship between TD and innovative performance to the transition economy, as well as examining the double-edged sword impact of state ownership on firm innovation performance.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
技术多元化与创新绩效:中国上市公司组织松弛与所有权的调节作用
本研究旨在考察技术多元化(TD)对企业创新绩效的影响,同时关注在中国上市公司背景下各种组织松弛(即已吸收松弛和未吸收松弛)和所有权类型(即国有或私有)的调节作用。我们的实证分析采用了固定效应回归估计法,使用了一个独特的中国制造业上市公司面板数据集,以及从 2012 年到 2020 年 9 年间的 13,566 个公司年度观测值。研究结果我们的研究结果表明,技术开发与创新绩效之间存在倒 U 型关系,并随不同类型的组织松弛和所有权而变化。在国有企业(SOEs)中,未吸收的松弛对倒 U 型关系有负面调节作用;但在民营企业(POEs)中,这种关系得到了正面调节。我们的研究结果表明,当所有制类型不同时,组织松弛对技术开发与创新绩效之间的关系有着截然不同的影响。因此,有意通过技术开发实现最佳创新绩效的管理者应了解如何利用组织松弛。原创性/价值本研究将技术开发与创新绩效之间的关系应用于转型经济,并考察了国有制对企业创新绩效的双刃剑影响,从而为现有文献做出了贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Artificial intelligence has become your co-worker! Exploring changes related to corporate culture and innovation capability Complementary perspectives on knowledge-and market-seeking outward FDI of EMNEs: a review and agenda for future research Does the presence of invitees in the audit committee impact firm value? Evidence from India Like minds think alike: impacts of cultural and trust congruences on joint innovation Technological diversification and innovation performance: the moderating effects of organizational slack and ownership in Chinese listed firms
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1